Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605541C070209
Original file (9605541C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that a record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) he received on 1 March 1991 be removed from all Army records and that the removal be reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) so that the record of NJP can be removed from their files.

APPLICANT STATES:  That the record of NJP contained in his official military records and FBI records is hindering his advancement in his current career of law enforcement.  He goes on to state that the NJP was the only infraction on his records and he desires to have it removed.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 14 June 1982 and remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 18 August 1989.

On 1 March 1991, while serving as a drill sergeant at Fort Gordon, Georgia, NJP was imposed against the applicant for conspiracy and wrongful possession of a false military identification card.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-5 (suspended for 6 months) and a forfeiture of $500.00 for 2 months.  He did not appeal his punishment.

The applicant was also relieved for cause from his position as a drill sergeant and subsequently transferred to Korea.

On 15 January 1992 the applicant was notified that the calendar year 1991 Sergeant First Class Promotion Selection Board had determined that based on the aforementioned relief for cause noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER) and the record of NJP, he was barred from reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program (QMP).  There is no indication that the applicant appealed the bar to reenlistment.

On 28 April 1992 he was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 and the QMP.  He had served 9 years, 10 months, and 15 days of total active service and received $8,906.64 in separation pay.

In the processing of this case, a staff member contacted the FBI to ascertain what information is contained in the FBI files.  Officials at the FBI indicated that he had been titled by the Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) in March 1991 for conspiracy, possession of a false ID card, false swearing, and making false official statements.  He received NJP and was reduced to the rank of sergeant (suspended) and fined $1,000.00.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  It appears that the applicant's acceptance of NJP was properly reported in accordance with the DOD policy and applicable regulations.

3.  It appears that the applicant believes his offense was a minor infraction and based on his having not done it again, it should be removed from official records because it impedes his employment opportunities in law enforcement.  The Board notes that the record of NJP is present in the official records not because of what the Army did but because of the applicant’s own misconduct.

4.  Furthermore, the applicant should be aware, based on his stated career field of law enforcement, of the importance of maintaining such records.  Likewise, the evidence he submitted to this Board does not warrant removing the record of proceedings of NJP from the record.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




	Karl F. Schneider
	Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610415C070209

    Original file (9610415C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also notes that the applicant’s relief for cause evaluation was “not preceded by written performance counseling and sufficient time elapsed to allow...[him]...to demonstrate improved performance” as required by his organization’s written policy. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment. It is unreasonable to believe that the applicant, as counsel maintains, was “totally unaware of the existence of the relief for cause NCOER until he received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001697

    Original file (20130001697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He humbly requests that the Army Board of Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) request that the CRC remove the record of NJP from the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) data base. In his most humble opinion, he believes that the great burden on his own future legal career would be greatly reduced if he did not have to explain to civilian employers how he was never arrested or criminally charged with any crime; but yet, how a criminal record for possession of marijuana shows up on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017713

    Original file (20080017713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also in accordance with the 697th IMA Det’s activation, the orders specified: a. unit members were to administratively train as Army Reservists 1 weekend per month to fulfill requirements to support SOCSOUTH with administrative support personnel; b. unit members would train for retirement points, not military pay; c. the unit would not be authorized a property book or permitted to acquire property; d. the unit would not be authorized weapons; and e. the unit would not be authorized to issue...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084612C070212

    Original file (2003084612C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the record of his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, and his letter of removal from the Drill Sergeant Development Program (DSDP) be removed from his OMPF (Official Military Personnel File) or be transferred to the restricted portion of his record. On 3 January 2003 the applicant submitted a request to the Army Suitability Board to have the derogatory information removed or transferred from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079546C070215

    Original file (2002079546C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the records of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), imposed against him on DA Forms 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 15 February 1990 and 9 April 1990, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF); that his records be corrected by reinstating his security clearance, dated 9 September 1992; and that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from RE-4 to RE-1. There is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059183C070421

    Original file (2001059183C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Inasmuch as the Army has a need to maintain such records and since it is clear that the applicant was the subject of an investigation, the Board finds no error or injustice in titling the applicant as a subject...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711784

    Original file (9711784.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted an appeal of the bar to reenlistment with the support of his chain of command to the Department of the Army Standby Advisory Board at the Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center (EREC). The DASEB denied his request. The applicant received a reprimand from his company commander and a letter of concern from his battalion commander and was counseled on several occasions by his commanders regarding his conduct in these matters.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03094977C070212

    Original file (03094977C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a 23 December 1997 memorandum to the Army Enlisted Records and Evaluation Center, an Army captain, a legal assistance attorney at Fort Bragg, stated that after a careful review of the applicant's NCOER, the QMP appeal packet, and the investigatory letter drafted by the applicant's brigade commander, that it was clear that the NCOER was unjustly tainted by the unproven accusation of the applicant's accuser, and was not based on the applicant's performance during the period. The ESRB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006839

    Original file (20110006839.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dodson appealed the EER to the Appeal Board. While Dodson’s EER Appeal was pending, on 29 March 1983 the PSB barred Dodson from reenlisting (QMP). It was not until after he received the QMP decision that he appealed the EERs and appealed the QMP decision to the STAB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073694C070403

    Original file (2002073694C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 October 2000, while stationed at Fort Drum, New York, the applicant was notified by his battalion commander that after a review of his OMPF, the Calendar Year 2000 Sergeant First Class Promotion Board had determined that he should be barred from reenlistment under the QMP based on the presence of the documents removing him from the Drill Sergeant Program. On 16 January 2001, the applicant signed another option statement in which he elected not to appeal the QMP action. The applicant’s...