Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605410C070209
Original file (9605410C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that he be given the Regular Army (RA) Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) educational enlistment incentive, and that his $1,200.00 contribution to the Montgomery G.I. Bill (MGIB) be refunded to him.  (The SLRP changed to the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) in or around 1990.)

3.  The applicant states that he had enlisted in the South Dakota Army National Guard (SDARNG) for the SLRP and only consented to enlist in the RA when he was assured that his SLRP would remain in effect.  However, his enlistment contract had “N/A” (not applicable) entered in the LRP option, making him ineligible for that incentive.  He believes that he should have been given a choice on whether he wanted that option.  Also, the contract provides yes or no spaces for the enlistee to initial when he or she elects an education incentive.  Without initials entered in all those spaces, the contract cannot be considered valid.  After his enlistment in the RA, he enrolled in the MGIB only when he was told that he had no alternative; that he could then only elect the MGIB since he did not select the SLRP when he enlisted.  He details his numerous unsuccessful efforts to change his MGIB to SLRP, he accuses his recruiter of misleading him in this and other areas, and he contends that the regulations governing the SLRP are vague in who is considered prior service for the purpose of SLRP eligibility, which is the reason the recruiter determined that he was ineligible for that option.

4. The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the SDARNG on 25 May 1990 with no prior service.  At that time he completed a DA Form 5261-4-R, SLRP Addendum, to receive SLRP educational benefits.  Section VII of that form, Termination, item 3, specifies that entitlement under the SLRP will be terminated should he be separated from the Selected Reserve as an enlisted person for any reason except for a period of non-availability.

5.  He completed 2 months and 4 days of initial active duty for training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of tuba player.  He was promoted to pay grade E-5.

6.  On 13 January 1993 he enlisted in the RA for 4 years in pay grade E-4.  In conjunction with his enlistment he completed a DA Form 3286-67, Statement of Understanding, Army Policy, in which is stated in item 5 “I have enlisted for the following Educational Incentive Programs (initial under the appropriate column for each program).”  That form provided yes and no spaces for the enlistee to initial if the MGIB, the Army College Fund (ACF), or the LRP was chosen in conjunction with the enlistment.  The applicant initialed affirmatively in the block for the MGIB; however, “N/A” was written across the ACF and the LRP blocks.  The applicant had a master’s degree at the time of his enlistment.

7.  The MGIB, as outlined in title 38, United States Code, chapter 30, section l411(b), provides for soldiers who entered the service after 30 June l985, to be automatically enrolled into the MGIB and to contribute $l,200.00 during their first l2 months service, which is non-refundable.  After completion of their service obligation, he or she is entitled to receive up to $300.00 per month educational benefits for 36 months.  The program is administered by the VA.

8.  The LRP is an educational enlistment incentive which provides for payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500.00 of the unpaid principal of eligible student loans for each year of active duty a soldier completes.  When a soldier enlists for this option, he must disenroll from the MGIB.

9.  Army Regulation 601-202, paragraph 3-2, and United States Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) Regulation 621-1, paragraph 3-2, limits the LRP option to non-prior service enlistees.  Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 3-2, defines a prior service enlistee as anyone who has served 180 or more days on active duty as a member of an armed force.
10.  In the processing of this case the staff of the Board found it necessary to contract the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel (DCSPER) for additional information.  The DCSPER stated that a guardsman on his or her initial enlistment is considered non-prior service if he or she has served less than 180 days on active duty.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant was eligible for the LRP, it appears that he was not offered that option.

2.  It is inconceivable that the applicant, who had existing student loans incurred in conjunction with his master’s degree and who had already derived benefits from the SDARNG SLRP, would opt for the MGIB in lieu of the LRP.

3.  The fact that the applicant’s RA enlistment contract had “N/A” entered in the spaces provided for the LRP and the ACF is evidence that the applicant was misinformed of his eligibility for the LRP by his recruiter.  As stated by the applicant, a declination of those incentives would have required him to enter his initials in the “No” space provided in the contract.

4.  If relief is granted in the form of showing that the applicant enlisted in the RA for the LRP, by necessity he would have to be disenrolled from the MGIB when he enlisted.  As such, it would be appropriate to refund to him the $1,200.00 he contributed to the MGIB.

5.  In view of the foregoing, it is in the interest of justice to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

	a.  by showing that the individual concerned elected the LRP option when he enlisted in the RA on 13 January 1993; 

	b.  by showing that he disenrolled from the MGIB when he enlisted in the RA; and

	c.  by refunding to him the $1,200.00 he contributed to the MGIB.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605968C070209

    Original file (9605968C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In conjunction with his enlistment he completed a DA Form 3286-67, Statement of Understanding, Army Policy, in which it is stated in item 5, “I have enlisted for the following Educational Incentive Programs (initial under the appropriate column for each program).” That form provides yes and no spaces for the enlistee to initial if the MGIB, the Army College Fund (ACF), or the LRP was chosen in conjunction with the enlistment. The reception battalion responded to that request stating that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607234C070209

    Original file (9607234C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At that time he completed a DA Form 3286-67, Statement of Understanding (Army Policy), in which item 5 states “I have enlisted for the following Educational Incentive Programs (initial under the appropriate column for each program).” That form then has yes and no areas for the enlistee to initial if the MGIB, the Army College Fund (ACF), or the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) are chosen in conjunction with the enlistment. The applicant’s enlistment contract shows that he had a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082642C070215

    Original file (2002082642C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board has carefully considered the PERSCOM’s advisory opinion in this case, and fully concurs with the PERSCOM’s assessment that no error was made in the applicant’s case and that there are no provisions to establish LRP eligibility after a soldier enlists. The circumstances in this case lead the Board to conclude that, since it is apparent that the applicant mistakenly thought that the LRP wouldn’t pay for loans to pay for graduate school and he was eligible for the LRP when he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607678C070209

    Original file (9607678C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When a soldier enlists for this option, a DA Form 3286-66 must be completed indicating that he has been promised the LRP, and the soldier must disenroll from the MGIB. The PERSCOM stated that no loans have been paid for the applicant under the LRP, but a note in his file shows that he had informed that office that he has loans which would qualify under the Higher Education Act of 1965, but has not as yet submitted those notes for payment. In the applicant’s case, that form is not present,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011494

    Original file (20080011494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also acknowledged he understood only certain loans qualify for the LRP program and that the government will repay a designated portion of any loan he incurred that was made, insured or guaranteed under Part B of the Higher Education Act (Guaranteed Student Loan) or any loan under Part E of such act (National Direct Student Loan) after 1 October 1975 and before he enlisted in the Army. The applicant enlisted with the LRP as a part of his Regular Army contract and disenrolled from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607808C070209

    Original file (9607808C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ACF is an incentive program which is available to certain Regular Army enlistees who participate in the MGIB. To be eligible for the ACF, the soldier must be a high school graduate, have an AFQT score of 50 or above, remain enrolled in the MGIB, and enlist for certain military occupational specialties, as determined by the Department of the Army. The PERSCOM stated that the MOS the applicant enlisted for was not qualifying for the ACF in conjunction with his 4-year term of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091315C070212

    Original file (2003091315C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that the student loans which were determined not to be payable under the terms of the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) be paid. The LRP is an educational enlistment incentive which provides for payment of 33 1/3 percent or $1,500.00, whichever is more, of the unpaid principal of eligible student loans for each year of active duty a soldier completes.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607631C070209

    Original file (9607631C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the loans his parents cosigned for his college education be paid in accordance with the provisions of the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) enlistment educational incentive and that he be refunded the $1,200.00 that was collected from his pay for the Montgomery G.I. The applicant obviously enlisted for the LRP and declined the MGIB. That error caused the applicant to be considered to have declined the LRP since no soldier may be enrolled in both educational incentives.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006583

    Original file (20120006583.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records maintained in the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) contain a DA Form 3286 (Statement for Enlistment) Annex B that shows the applicant acknowledged he was enlisting for the following program options on 20 October 2009: a. U.S. Army Station/Unit/Area/Command Enlistment Program; b. U.S. Army Incentive Enlistment Program (U.S. Army High Grad Bonus (Bachelor), U.S. Army Civilian Acquired Skills Bonus, U.S. Army College Fund ($70,956), 4 year; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024292

    Original file (20100024292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DA Form 3286 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Program – U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program), dated 15 February 2007, he completed shows he would receive the LRP, amongst other incentives. The MGIB is not available to Soldiers who enlist for the LRP. Since the applicant elected the MGIB, he could not receive the LRP.