Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605281bC070209
Original file (9605281bC070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be promoted to captain based on his World War II service.

3.  He states, in effect, that he was eligible for promotion to captain at the time of his release from active duty on 10 March 1946.  

4.  The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973.  Information herein was obtained from WD AGO Form 66-1 (Officer’s and Warrant Officer’s Qualification Card) provided by the applicant.

5.  His military record shows that he was appointed to the grade of 2nd lieutenant upon completion of officer candidate school on 1 July 1943.  He served in the European-African Middle-Eastern Theater of Operations from 17 October 1944 until 11 July 1945.  He was promoted to 1st lieutenant effective 1 January 1945 and released from active duty on 10 March 1946 in that grade.

6.  His efficiency ratings in 11 duty assignments of record following his appointment as a 2nd lieutenant include six superior ratings, one excellent rating, two very satisfactory ratings and one satisfactory rating, two assignments were not rated because of insufficient time.  His overall efficiency index based on his efficiency ratings was between excellent and superior (43.3 computed in accordance with then existing guidance).

7.  On 31 October 1945 the War Department announced a new promotion policy for officers being released from active duty as the result of the demobilization after WWII.  This guidance was subsequently modified and published as War Department Circular 311, dated 18 October 1946.  These documents, in pertinent part, provided for the separation from active duty promotions of certain officers to the next higher rank (from first lieutenant through colonel).  Officers were required to have held their prior rank a specified period of time.  In the case of promotions from first lieutenant to captain, the period was 18 months.  However, the circular also provided that officers would be given 50 percent credit for all time spent in the lower rank overseas.  The officer's narrative efficiency ratings would be converted to a numerical rating as follows:

      NARRATIVE RATING               POINTS

      Superior                       50
      Excellent                      40
      Very Satisfactory              30
      Satisfactory                   20
      Unsatisfactory                 10

Numerical ratings would be converted to a narrative rating, then an efficiency index score (points).

8.  To be promoted, the officer's combined efficiency index was required to be 40 points or higher for all rated periods while on active duty.  For officers already released from active duty, their cases would be referred to the War Department for resolution.  Promotions would be effective the date the officer departed active duty.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant served for 9 months overseas as an officer.  He was promoted to the grade of 1st lieutenant on 1 January 1945 and separated from the service on 10 March 1946, 14 months later.  With the 50 percent credit for overseas service to be applied to the time in grade requirement for promotion, he had more than 18 months in the grade of 1st lieutenant at the time he was separated from active duty.

2.  Efficiency ratings shown on his WD AGO Form 66-1 when computed in accordance with instructions for determining an officer’s efficiency index reveal his efficiency index is 43.1, which exceeds the 40 or higher required for promotion.

3.  Since he departed active duty on 10 March 1946, that date should be the effective date of his promotion to the grade of captain under the promotion of officers on release from active duty program.
4.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned received a promotion to the grade of captain on 10 March 1946 under the provisions of War Department Circular 311, dated 18 October 1946.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071014C070402

    Original file (2002071014C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military record be corrected to show his grade as captain. Promotions would be effective the date the officer departed active duty on terminal leave. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was promoted to the grade of captain effective on the date he entered terminal leave status – 7 September 1946.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007445

    Original file (20080007445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is insufficient evidence in the available records to show that the FSM was promoted to the rank of 1st Lieutenant prior to his separation from active duty. The FSM's records are unavailable for review, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to show that the FSM was considered or recommended for promotion to 1st Lieutenant prior to his separation from active duty. The FSM's narrative efficiency rating is not available and all available records show he was separated from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066166C070421

    Original file (2001066166C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was promoted to the grade of captain effective on the date he entered terminal leave status - 29 March 1946. Moreover, he is also entitled to a third bronze battle star to his Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal as having been a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004746

    Original file (20090004746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show his rank as a CPT. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was appointed as a Signal 2LT in the Army of the United States on 2 March 1945 and was promoted and/or appointed to 1LT on 31 January 1946. He did not complete the required 18 months of active duty in the grade of 1LT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059620C070421

    Original file (2001059620C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In two separate applications, that his records be corrected to show that he was promoted to the rank of corporal on 1 January 1942 and to the rank of sergeant on 5 January 1945. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant was ever promoted beyond the rank of private first class while he was in the Army. However, there is no evidence of record nor has he submitted any evidence to show that all personnel recovered during the liberation of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067232C070402

    Original file (2002067232C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous application in which he asks that his military record be corrected to show that he was promoted to the grade of captain. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records to show that he was promoted to the grade of captain effective on the date he was placed on terminal leave, 3 April 1946. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074646C070403

    Original file (2002074646C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be granted a terminal leave promotion from captain (CPT) to major (MAJ). War Department Circular 140, in effect at the time, provided the Army’s policy for the promotion of officers upon relief from active duty (REFRAD). As permitted by the Army policy in effect at the time, absent the rating or evaluation forms necessary to establish the applicant’s efficiency index, the Board elects to accept his application to the Board as the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609077aC070209

    Original file (9609077aC070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, that he just recently learned that officers released at the conclusion of World War II were eligible for a terminal leave promotion. Documents provided by the applicant together with the pertinent instructions from War Department Circular 140 indicates that he had a an efficiency index and the requisite time in grade that made him eligible for a relief from active duty promotion to the next higher grade upon his separation from active duty on 25 December 1945. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012714

    Original file (20080012714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He further states that he requests that his military records be corrected to reflect his promotion to CPT. This case is being considered using reconstructed records that include the following documents: Officer and Warrant Officer Qualification Card (WD AGO Form 66); WD AGO Form 100; Military Record and Report of Separation Certificate of Service (WD AGO Form 53-98); Report of Entry on Active Duty;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707462A

    Original file (9707462A.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that she be granted a terminal leave promotion from First Lieutenant to Captain and her report of separation be corrected accordingly. On 29 April 1946, the applicant was notified that she apparently had been eligible for promotion upon separation from the Service in accordance with War Department Circular 10, dated 11 January 1946 but since she had not been promoted coincident with her relief from active duty, she could be promoted by The Adjutant General...