Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605074C070209
Original file (9605074C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he changed his SBP (Survivor Benefit Plan) election from “spouse, based on full retired pay” to “spouse only, base amount $392.00” be approved.

3.  The applicant's military records show that he retired from active duty on 1 March 1995 with the rank of chief warrant officer four with more than 20 years of creditable active service.  The applicant elected SBP participation for spouse only coverage with a reduced base amount of $392.00, which required spousal concurrence by law (spouse concurred with the applicant’s desired election copy attached).  However, during the processing of his application an administrative error was committed by personnel at the Retirement Service Office, at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.  Apparently two DD Forms 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) were submitted to DFAS-CL, one of which did not provide the desired reduced based amount.  DFAS-CL therefore, established the election as “full spouse” and withheld premiums accordingly.  Technically, the election should have been input as “auto full spouse”.  On 19 July 1995, the applicant submitted an appeal to this Board.

4.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity
after death to surviving dependents.  However, in those cases where the member elected not to participate in the SBP, to participate at less than the maximum coverage, or to exclude the spouse by designating children only as beneficiaries, it was required that the spouse was to be made aware of the member's decision and of the implications of that decision as it affected the spouse's future welfare.

5.  The cost of the survivor annuity for a spouse and the amount of the annuity are computed from the base amount selected.  The base amount may be any amount from a minimum of $300.00 (or the full monthly retired pay if less than $300.00) up to full retired pay.  The cost of the annuity is two and one-half percent of the base amount up to $300.00, plus 10 percent of the balance of the base amount over $300.00.  The annuity payable is 55 percent of the base amount selected.

7.  In the processing of this case, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the SBP Board which recommended that the applicant’s request to change his survivor benefit plan election from “spouse, based on full retired pay” to spouse only, base amount $392” be approved, retroactive to date of retirement and that the record should also reflect that the applicant declined coverage for eligible children on date of retirement. 

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant retired on 1 March 1995, and elected spouse only SBP coverage with a reduced based amount of $392 in which his spouse concurred with the applicant’s decision.

2.  However, the RSO, at Fort Bragg North Carolina committed an administrative error.  Apparently, two DD Forms 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), somehow was submitted to DFAS-CL.  DFAS-CL therefore, established the election as “full spouse” and with held premiums accordingly.  Technically the election should have been input as “auto full spouse”.

3.  There appears to be no evidence of negligence on the part of the applicant.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing, findings, conclusions and the advisory opinion, it would be appropriate to correct the records as recommended below. 

RECOMMENDATION:  

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned elected SBP for “spouse only base amount $392 retroactive to date of retirement with retroactive cost refund of overcollected premiums from date of retirement.
BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008007

    Original file (20100008007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His pay records also show he paid SBP premiums throughout the years based on his SBP election of the reduced amount. His 10 September 2009 retiree account statement shows spouse SBP coverage based on the full amount. His pay records show he paid SBP premiums from 1985 to 2006 based on this reduced amount.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011835

    Original file (20090011835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the applicant that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The evidence of record shows that upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate, on 26 September 1979, electing immediate coverage under Option C for "spouse and children" at a reduced amount. The evidence of record further shows that as he neared age 60, the applicant executed another form, in this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009467

    Original file (20080009467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request: Self-Authored Statement; DD Form 2656, dated 27 July 2007; Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage (DD Form 2656-1); Defense Finance and Accounting (DFAS) Summary of Retired Pay Account; Retiree Account Statements, dated 14 December 2007, and 16/17 January 2008; and Divorce Military Qualifying Court Order, filed 24 May 2000. This document shows the applicant elected RCSBP on 27 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016008

    Original file (20080016008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request) dated 1 August 2005 be accepted as the correct and official date he requested to terminate coverage and that all SBP and Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) costs and overcharges as listed on his November 2005 and September 2007 Retiree Account Statements be refunded. Therefore, the applicant's 1 August 2005 DD Form 2656-2 is accepted as sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016000

    Original file (20080016000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Retiree Account Statement, as of 2 September 2008, that shows the applicant’s retiree pay account has been corrected to implement SBP former spouse coverage and an annuity base amount of $5,431.55, an SBP monthly premium of $353.05, and an annuity payable at 55 percent of the applicant’s base amount, which would be $2,987.35. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008440

    Original file (20080008440.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant further submits a notarized statement, dated 24 April 2008, wherein his current spouse concurred with the correction of his records to provide SBP benefits to his former spouse. On 10 July 1991, the applicant elected to provide an SBP annuity to his former spouse, who was at the time, his current spouse. In 2006, the applicant elected SBP coverage participation for his "Spouse Only" for coverage for his current spouse; however, this election was of no effect because he had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011348

    Original file (20110011348 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant elected spouse and children SBP coverage at a reduced base amount at the time of his retirement from military service. SBP premiums are deducted from a member’s retired pay. Therefore, based on the lack of SBP counseling received at the time of retirement, the applicant's record should be corrected in the interest of equity and justice, to show he declined participation, with his wife's concurrence, in the SBP which would also result in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00140

    Original file (BC-2012-00140.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00140 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he elected his former spouse as beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) based upon full retirement pay. The court ordered the applicant to provide SBP coverage on the former spouse’s behalf, but did not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016959

    Original file (20110016959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * marriage certificate * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 3 January 1995 * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 4 October 2007 * Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)-Cleveland (CL) Form 7220/148 (Retiree Account Statement), dated 2 December 2010 * letter to DFAS, dated 21 January 2011 * letter from DFAS, dated 22 March 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 4 October 2007, he completed a DD Form 2656 electing spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006558

    Original file (20110006558.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election from spouse to former spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows the FSM maintained SBP spouse coverage following his divorce from the applicant, with his former spouse's DOB listed as that of his designated beneficiary for SBP benefits. Therefore, the FSM's records should be corrected to show...