Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605053C070209
Original file (9605053C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his summary court-martial conviction be expunged and that he be advanced to the rank of sergeant major (E-9) on the retired list.  He contends that he was suffering from anxiety and stress prior to his court-martial, but this was never taken into consideration. He also contends that, in February 1971, he was evaluated for promotion to staff sergeant and placed on the promotion list with 558.1 promotion points, but was never reevaluated in 1972 and 1973.

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 22 July 1949 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 January 1967.  Following completion of the required military training, he was assigned to a unit in Germany, with duty as an armor crewman.  The applicant served on continuous active duty until his retirement on 31 May 1987. Upon retirement in the rank of sergeant first class (E-7), he had 20 years, 4 months, and 10 days of creditable service.

The applicant’s available records indicate appointments and reductions as follows:

			RANK/GRADE		DATE OF RANK

			 PVT/E-1			   670112
			 PVT/E-2			   670512
			 PFC/E-3			   670727
			 SP4/E-4			   680702
			 SP5/E-5			   690815
			 SP4/E-4			   730622
			 SGT/E-5			   760809
			 SSG/E-6			   770809
			 SFC/E-7			   830630

His only reduction occurred as a result of a summary court-martial conviction on 20 June 1976.  During the period 17-26 April 1973, he was absent without leave from his unit.  Tried by a summary court-martial, he was convicted and sentenced to reduction to SP4 and 30 days restriction.

Army Regulation 600-200, then in effect, placed the requirement for promotion reevaluation on the individual soldier.  It required the soldier to submit his request in writing and advised him that reevaluation could lead to a loss of recommended promotion list status:  when the soldier was not recommended for promotion by a majority of the board, or; when the total administrative points fell below 550 for promotion to staff sergeant.  There is nothing in the applicant’s record to show that he ever applied for promotion reconsideration.

Because the applicant was tried by a summary court-martial, no record of that trial exists for review by this Board.  It cannot be stated whether the applicant’s mental state was taken into consideration during his court-martial.  Further, the Military Justice Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-209), provides, in pertinent part, that military correction boards may not disturb the finality of a conviction by court-martial.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 31 May 1987, the date discharge.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 31 May 1990.

The application is dated 29 August 1995 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021888

    Original file (20090021888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She adds she was assigned to work for a lieutenant who was a racist. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant contends that her bad conduct discharge should be upgraded because she was entrapped, which led to the charges for her trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014335

    Original file (20140014335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Someone saw him on the truck and told the colonel he broke restriction. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 9 months, and 9 days. c. There is no evidence in his records and he provides none to show he was advanced above the rank/grade of PVT/E-1 between the date of his last reduction and the date of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024503

    Original file (20110024503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records by setting aside the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) imposed under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), and restoration of his rank/pay grade. The evidence in this case suggests that both NJP's were properly imposed against the applicant in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time with no indications of any procedural errors that may have jeopardized his rights. In this case,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105049C070208

    Original file (2004105049C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states in effect that a lieutenant colonel, pay grade O- 5, did not have the authority to reduce him. Department of the Army had that authority. These letters, and his record of satisfactory service, both before and after his court-martial, as evidenced by his evaluation reports, are insufficient to grant him the relief requested.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019284

    Original file (20100019284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, restoration of his rank to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and correction of DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this rank. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade in which an enlisted Soldier was serving at the time of separation with an indication whether it was a permanent or a temporary grade. The evidence of record shows he was reduced to the permanent grade of RCT/E1 on 20 November 1959 by an SPCM conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008301

    Original file (20080008301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Items 5a (Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of the applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows the entries SP4 and E-4, respectively. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant did not provide any evidence, that shows he had an out-of-State job transfer while serving in the Army National Guard. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit any evidence that shows he was promoted again to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010954

    Original file (20120010954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no available evidence in the applicant's military service records that show he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge. The applicant’s request to correct his military service records to add the NDSM, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge, and to change his rank to PFC was carefully considered and it was determined there is insufficient evidence to support his request. Therefore, his record shows the correct rank of PVT/E-1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014982

    Original file (20070014982.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 15 June 1987, to show "specialist four (SP4)" instead of "private first class (PFC)" in Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and "E-4" instead of "E-3" in Item 4b (Pay Grade). DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 1 February 1987, shows that the applicant was promoted to PFC/E-3 in accordance with Army regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), effective 1 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021501

    Original file (20140021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as master sergeant (MSG), his pay grade as E-8, and his date of rank (DOR) as 11 March 1985. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3961, provides the legal authority for the retired grade of Army personnel on the Retired List. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he retired from active duty in the grade of E-8 because he was...