Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605025C070209
Original file (9605025C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  Correction of his military records to show that he was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant.

APPLICANT STATES:  In effect, that prior to his discharge there was a provision that allowed personnel serving in the top three enlisted grades to be promoted to the rank of second lieutenant upon application.  He goes on to state that he applied for the promotion but never received a response to his application.  In support of his application he submits copies of his separation documents, copies of letters indicating his attempts to obtain citizenship, and copies of recommendations for his enlisted promotions.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records were destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973.  Information contained herein was obtained from the separation documents provided by the applicant:

The applicant enlisted as a non U.S. citizen in Kunming, China on 19 February 1945 for the duration of the war plus 6 months.  He attained the grade of staff sergeant and performed the duties of an administrative NCO.  He was honorably discharged at the Presidio of San Francisco, California on 27 February 1948.  He reenlisted the next day (28 February 1948) for a period of 1 year.  He was again honorably discharged on 29 February 1949 after having served a total of 4 years and 9 days of total active service.  He was discharged in the rank of sergeant.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  Inasmuch as there are no records available to substantiate the applicant’s claim that he applied for a commission or that the request was ever acted upon, there is no basis upon which to approve his request.

2.  Likewise, there is no evidence to show that the applicant would have been selected had he applied and it would not be appropriate for the Board to make such a determination given the passage of time that has occurred (over 40 years) and the unavailability of records.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis to approve the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702074

    Original file (9702074.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 January 1968, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the applicant's request for reappointment in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of captain and for assignment to the Retired Reserve. After review of the records, DAO found no error or injustice in the application of procedures in effect at the time of applicant's appointment. - Letters from applicant, dated 30 Dec 97 and Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member Mr. Michael P. Higgins, Member Panel Chair The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017664

    Original file (20130017664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Soldier's Qualification Record) shows he held the grade of Sgt upon enlistment in and discharge from the USAR. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in an active duty status from 23 September 1946 to 4 August 1948. However, a few days before his discharge, the Army changed the rank structure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100281C070208

    Original file (2004100281C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Although the applicant was promoted to the rank of colonel in the USAR, he did not serve on active duty in that rank and thus is not entitled to either be retired in that rank or to have his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101613C070208

    Original file (04101613C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the records of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he retired in the grade of major. His request was approved and he was discharged on 31 October 1970 in the grade of captain. Although the certificates that the applicant submits with her request show that her late husband's grade was major, there is no evidence to show that he was ever promoted to that grade.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001710

    Original file (20090001710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant also states that the FSM retired on 31 January 1948, after 34 years of active service. The applicant provides the following documents in support of the application: Self-Authored Letter; Standard Form 192 (Report of the Death of an American Citizen); Certificate of Naturalization; Certificate Birth; WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge ),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071122C070402

    Original file (2002071122C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In March 1952, he submitted a request to appear before an ORC board to be considered for appointment as a commissioned officer. He indicated that the request was not favorably considered because the FSM was eligible for consideration for an appointment in the ORC under current regulations and that the authority to do so had been delegated to Army commanders in the area in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016317

    Original file (20100016317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 February 2008, the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant, pay grade O1E, MSC, in specialty 70B (Health Service Administration). The opinion stated that the applicant's appointment was based on his bachelor's degree in health services administration. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was appointed as a second lieutenant, MSC based on his bachelor's degree, and awarded specialty 70B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001676C070206

    Original file (20050001676C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his commission as a first lieutenant (1LT) in the New York Army National Guard (ARNG) be reinstated and he be promoted to captain. By letter dated 4 May 1999, the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM informed the applicant he had been considered but not selected for promotion. The Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM letter dated 4 May 1999 failed to inform the applicant he had been considered but not selected for promotion for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001676C070206

    Original file (20050001676C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). The applicant requests that his commission as a first lieutenant (1LT) in the New York Army National Guard (ARNG) be reinstated and he be promoted to captain. Army Regulation 135-175 (Separation of Officers) states, in pertinent part, officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to be selected for promotion after the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081334C070215

    Original file (2002081334C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By memorandum dated 19 July 2001, the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, U. S. Total Army Personnel Command, informed the applicant that he had been promoted as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army in Active Guard/Reserve Status under the provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, chapter 1405 (Promotions). That office recommended the applicant's request be denied. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the...