Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 199608068C070209
Original file (199608068C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  Consideration for award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM).

APPLICANT STATES:  The fact that proper disposition of the award recommendation was not handled according to Army Regulation or Inspector General interpretation.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

On 18 February 1964, he enlisted in the Regular Army.  On 25 November 1966, he was transferred to the Army Reserve for 4 years and discharged on 
17 February 1970.

On 23 May 1979, he enlisted in the Army Reserve and on 25 October 1981, he was discharged with 2 years, 5 months and 2 days credited reserve time.

On 26 October 1981, applicant was commissioned a First Lieutenant in the USAR.  He was ordered to active duty on 15 March 1982 for two years with a release date of 14 March 1984.

Between 18 November 1983 and 3 January 1986, applicantÂ’s active duty commitment was amended five times with a final release date of 21 April 1986 and 4 years, 1 month and 7 days of creditable service.

On 19 May 1986, he was recalled to active duty for 3 years and promoted to 
the grade of Captain with a DOR of 25 October 1985.

Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, indicates in pertinent part, it is the responsibility of any individual having personal knowledge of an act, achievement or service believed to warrant the award of a decoration to submit a formal recommendation into military command channels for consideration within 2 years of the act, achievement or service to be honored and the award must be made within 3 years.  There are regulatory provisions for lost recommendations but not for late recommendations, reconsideration or for
upgrading to a more prestigious award.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  There is no evidence that a recommendation was made or that orders were published for award of the MSM.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009142

    Original file (20120009142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 June 1999 to add the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (5th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (5th Award) * Army Superior Unit Award (ASUA) (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) (2nd Award) * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019254

    Original file (20080019254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and that the date on the MSM certificate be corrected. The MSM certificate on file in the OMPF shows it was awarded the applicant for 20 years of exceptionally meritorious service during the period 2 September 1996 to 1 September 2006 and that it was announced in Headquarters, 95th Division (IT), Permanent Orders 154-006, dated 2 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001679

    Original file (20120001679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows: a. permanent orders awarded the applicant the MSM (3rd Award) for the period 12 October 1999 to 30 November 2000; b. the applicant qualified for award of the VSM and he served in six campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the AGCM (3rd Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal and correct his 30 November 2000 DD Form 214 to show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012091

    Original file (20110012091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) awarded him in January 1999 should be added to item 13 of his DD Form 214; b. the following entries should be added to item 14 of his DD Form 214: * Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Training (December 1997) * Advanced Techniques in Evidence and Property Management (April 1997) * Interview and Interrogations (August 1997) * Military Police Advanced Noncommissioned Officer's Course (ANCOC) (June 1996) * Managing Criminal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020354

    Original file (20090020354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the lack of evidence in the applicant's OMPF to include no permanent orders awarding him the MSM, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019382

    Original file (20120019382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 October 1981 to show the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) (3rd Award), Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), and National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). Service medals and awards are not issued by the ABCMR. This pamphlet shows the 23rd Administration Company was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for the period 1 January 1968 through 31 August 1969,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019071

    Original file (20110019071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 6 October 2006 to show the following awards: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (6th Award) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (4th Award) * Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) 2. Her record contains two orders and she provided two additional orders showing she was awarded a total of four ARCOMs. Her record also contains...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005313

    Original file (20080005313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 September 2002, a subordinate officer (second lieutenant) submitted a Recommendation for Award (DA Form 638) recommending the applicant for award of the BSM for meritorious service during the period of 1 July to 1 October 2002. The company and battalion commanders recommended approval of the MSM; however, the group commander (colonel) downgraded the award to award of the ARCOM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states it is the responsibility of any individual having personal knowledge of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007117

    Original file (20130007117.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all of his authorized awards and issuance of those awards. The applicant states, in effect, he did not receive all of his awards due to apathy on the part of his chain of command at the time and he believes he is entitled to award of the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM), Army Service Ribbon (ASR), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), OSR Commemorative...