Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511841C070209
Original file (9511841C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, the applicant requests that his retirement rank be changed from staff sergeant, pay grade E-6, to warrant officer. 

APPLICANT STATES:  That he completed the warrant officer entry course in December 1987, completed warrant officer technician training for the hawk missile system in 
December 1988, and received verification of military experience and training in March 1995.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

The applicant enlisted in the Army on 21 January 1976.

On 23 May 1985 the applicant received a letter of reprimand for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquors.

The applicant completed the warrant officer entry course at Fort Rucker, Alabama on 20 October 1987.  He completed a 10 month hawk missile system technician course at Fort Bliss, Texas on 16 December 1988.  His academic evaluation report for that course shows that he was charged with driving while intoxicated during his assignment at Fort Bliss.

On 18 January 1989 the applicant received a letter of reprimand for misconduct - causing a traffic accident resulting in injuries, while under the influence of alcohol.

In December 1989 the Army Central Personnel Security Facility at Fort Meade, Maryland notified the applicant of the intent to revoke his security clearance.  That letter of intent indicated that the applicant received a written reprimand for assault and battery upon his wife in 1982, was charged with driving while intoxicated in September 1984, was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicating liquors and speeding in May 1985, was charged with wrongful appropriation of private property in January 1986, had his check cashing privileges suspended indefinitely in 1986, and was charged with driving while intoxicated in 1988.  In 
May 1990, after consideration of the applicant’s response to the letter of intent, the applicant’s security clearance was revoked. 
On 4 April 1994 the applicant received a memorandum of reprimand for driving while impaired.

On 8 September 1995 the applicant was notified that he was barred from reenlistment under the qualitative management program (QMP).  The notification memorandum indicated that the applicant had received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, on one occasion, had received three letters of reprimand, and had his security clearance revoked.

The applicant completed numerous functional and technical courses during his military career.  His NCO evaluation reports have been no less than outstanding, and he has received numerous certificates of achievement and awards, including the meritorious service medal for 20 years of faithful service from 21 January 1976 to 31 January 1976.

There is no evidence of record that the applicant was appointed a warrant officer.

The applicant’s DD Form 214 showing his separation from active duty is not available.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  Although the applicant’s DD Form 214 is not available, it can be safely assumed, based upon the applicant’s request, that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve with the rank of Staff Sergeant.

2.  The applicant was not appointed a warrant officer.  The applicant’s completion of a warrant officer entry course and a hawk missile technician course does not equate to an appointment as a warrant officer, nor retirement with that rank.  He cannot be retired in a rank that he never held.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025124

    Original file (20110025124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 6 April 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-37, under the EDP and his service was characterized as under honorable conditions (general). The applicant had requested the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) upgrade his discharge to an honorable discharge. (3) Item 25 of the applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that he did not have a valid personnel security investigation status at the time of his separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077764C070215

    Original file (2002077764C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 190-5 (Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision) provides that soldiers will be issued an administrative letter of reprimand for alcohol related driving incidents in the following circumstances: When there is a conviction for driving while intoxicated or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs; a refusal to take a properly requested blood, urine or breath test; when the individual was driving or in physical control of a vehicle on post with a BAC of .10 or off post with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067352C070402

    Original file (2002067352C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. After a comprehensive review of his records, he was not selected for promotion and he was identified for a Department of the Army (DA) bar to reenlistment under the qualitative management program. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009860

    Original file (20060009860.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel contends that, in October 2001, the Defense Security Service issued the applicant a Letter of Intent to revoke his security clearance, citing allegations of foreign influence, foreign preference, and personal conduct. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has failed to provide sufficient independent evidence showing that at the time of the revocation of his security clearance, he either surrendered his Iranian passport or requested permission to retain the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017710

    Original file (AR20080017710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2006, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, wrongfully having a breath alcohol content greater than .05 grams of alcohol per...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011015C080213

    Original file (20070011015C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 October 2004, the Commandant, USASMA recommended the GOMOR be placed in the applicant’s local personnel file. The applicant contended that the State of Texas pursued a license suspension against him and the judge, after hearing all the evidence, determined that the State had not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that sufficient facts existed to suspend his license based on the blood test. However, it is also noted that in his 27 October letter for consideration the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013466C070206

    Original file (20050013466C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and orders; his AGONM Form 600-1 (Request for Discharge, NMARNG); his NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) and orders; and his ARNG personnel records, in support of his request. The applicant was notified that as stated in Chapter 6-4 of the National Guard Regulation 600-5, Soldiers would be separated without board action and he did not have the right to an appeal or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004838

    Original file (20140004838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, on 4 September 2012, [Applicant] received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, which was filed in his OMPF, based on his arrest at FT. [sic] Bragg on 14 June 2012 for failing to maintain his lane and refusal to submit to a breathalyzer resulting in a charge of driving while intoxicated. On 21 September 2012, in a memorandum for his senior rater, the applicant stated: In response to the Officer Evaluation Report Referral, I respectfully submit the following: On 15 June 2012 I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9207280

    Original file (9207280.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s commander submitted a recommendation for the applicant’s separation under chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200. The applicant’s commander testified that an Army Regulation 15-6 was done because of rumors of the applicant’s involvement with another woman, but there was no proof of misconduct; that the applicant was command directed to “D&A (drug and alcohol)” on 29 May 1987; that the applicant told him on 8 May 1987 that he had already been scheduled for an appointment; that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004833

    Original file (20120004833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains a military police report, dated 23 December 1986, which states he was arrested for public intoxication off post at 0600 hours, in El Paso, TX. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, and issued a general discharge. The evidence of record shows he was arrested several times for driving while intoxicated and public intoxication.