Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511235C070209
Original file (9511235C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

APPLICANT STATES:  That he served in combat and was awarded the CIB during a ceremony but it was omitted from his original DD Form 214.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He was inducted on 4 September 1969 and served overseas tours in both Germany and Vietnam.  He was honorably discharged on 6 September 1971 in pay grade E-4.  His DD Form 214 reflects that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal the Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Sharpshooter Badge with rifle bar.

While the record indicates that he served in a combat unit while in Vietnam, there is no evidence that he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to Army infantry or special forces officers in the grade of colonel or below, or to Army enlisted soldiers or warrant officers with an infantry or special forces military occupational specialty who, subsequent to 6 December 1941, satisfactorily performed duty while assigned or attached as a member of an infantry, ranger or special forces unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size during any period such unit was engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient.  The unit must have been in active ground combat with the enemy during the period.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  The available records contain no evidence that he was awarded a CIB, nor is there any documentation indicating that his unit of assignment was in combat with the enemy, which is a necessary prerequisite for award of the CIB.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		David R. Kinneer
		Executive Secretary

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002802

    Original file (20110002802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show these awards. There is no evidence in the available record which shows the applicant was either recommended for or awarded the CIB. There is no evidence showing he was ever awarded or recommended for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103645C070208

    Original file (2004103645C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and other, related awards. The War Department received requests to award the CIB to non-infantry individuals and units employed as infantry during tactical emergencies. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct his DD Form 214 to add the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and to show he is authorized to wear three...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005804C070208

    Original file (040005804C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows that the applicant was assigned to United States military units, e.g. 525th Military Intelligence Group and MACV Advisor Team 51, first as an intelligence analyst and later as an order of battle specialist in a G-2 Section of the 21st ARVN Infantry Division. The evidence shows that the applicant’s record contains administrative error that does not require action by the Board. The Case Management Support Division in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012590

    Original file (20110012590.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show award of the CIB. There is no evidence in the available record which shows the applicant was either recommended for or awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties while assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010129

    Original file (20080010129.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the CIB and correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010054

    Original file (20080010054.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his rifle qualification badges. There are no orders in the applicant's record to show he was recommended for or awarded the CIB. Paragraph 8-6 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016888

    Original file (20140016888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; he must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat; and he must actively participate in such ground combat. Records show he participated in two campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014814

    Original file (20090014814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must be evidence confirming the applicant held and served in an infantry MOS in a qualifying infantry unit, and there must be evidence that he was present and participated with that unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held and served in MOS 11B while assigned to a qualifying infantry unit for award of the CIB. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006782

    Original file (20080006782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the case, the Board found no evidence of record that showed the applicant served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size, and as a result, concluded there was insufficient evidence to support award of the CIB. Further, the evidence provided by the applicant places him with his qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces in the RVN. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008670

    Original file (20110008670.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110008670 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The War Department received requests to award the Combat Infantryman Badge to non-infantry individuals and units employed as infantry during tactical emergencies. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that the evidence provided (orders awarding the CIB to other officers in the unit and a statement from his former commander) supported...