Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511067C070209
Original file (9511067C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, a medical retirement.

APPLICANT STATES:  He states, in effect that his discharge should be changed from an honorable discharge (HD) to permanent disability.  He also states, that he should have been medically evaluated prior to separation.   

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 8 July 1957.  He completed 12 years of formal education.  On 29 April 1977, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years.  He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36L10 (Switching Central Repairer).  His service was continuous through reenlistments and extensions.  The highest grade he achieved was pay grade E-5.

In June 1978, the applicant was diagnosed as having Trigeminal Neuralgia, (a disorder of the sensory nucleus of the trigeminal nerve).  There is no medical evidence in his medical records which indicates that during the applicant’s 15 years of military service that he was preferred to a medical evaluation board.

The applicant signed a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) requesting that he be discharged from the service in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8, under the FY92 Enlisted Voluntary Early Release Program (VSI).  The applicant’s request was approved, upon the soldier having at least 5 years of continuous active service.  The applicant was advised of his rights.

On 3 September 1992, a separation physical examination, performed by a competent medical doctor determined that the applicant was then medically fit for retention.

On 25 September 1992, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-5, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-8 (Early Release Program - Voluntary Separation Incentive), with an honorable discharge.  He received separation pay in the amount of $41,664.96.  The applicant had completed 15 years, 4 months and 27 days of active military service.  He was awarded the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct Medal (5th award), the National Defense Service Medal, the Army Service Ribbon and the Overseas Service Ribbon (3rd award).  He was given a reentry code of RE-3 and was transferred to an Army Reserve unit.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth, policy and prescribes procedures for separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 16-8, prescribes the procedures for the reduction of enlisted strength in the Army.  These programs are prescribed periodically by the Secretary of the Army to meet budgetary end-strengths as required by the Congress of the United States.  Personnel so separated may be eligible to reenlist at a later date based on the needs of the Army. Former soldiers should work with their local recruiting office to determined their reenlistment eligibility.

The VSI/SSB program was authorized by Congress as a force management tool with which to effect the drawdown of military forces.  The program is not an entitlement; accordingly, it is not offered to all soldiers. Rather, it is offered to select soldiers in excess grades/skills who are otherwise fully eligible for continued service.  These are soldiers who, but for the drawdown, would be eligible to qualify for normal 20 year retirement.  The bonus is offered as an incentive to leave military service prior to the 
20 year mark.  Soldiers so separated are required to serve a minimum of 3 years in the Army Reserve. 

On 25 June 1993, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated the applicant at 30 percent for cranial nerve paralysis and face and speech problems, 20 percent for organic mental disorder (claimed as loss of memory) and 
10 percent for lumbar spine/mild osteoarthritic.

The award of VA compensation does not mandate disability retirement or separation from the Army.  The VA, operating under its own policies and regulations, may make a determination that a medical condition warrants compensation.  The VA is not required to determine fitness for duty at the time of separation.  The Army must find a member physically unfit before he can be medically retired or separated.

Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for disabilities which were incurred in or aggravated by active military service.

A medical consultant for the Board, in a comment (COPY ATTACHED) to this Board, opined that the applicant was medically cleared for separation. 

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  The fact that the VA, in its discretion, has awarded the applicant a disability rating is a prerogative exercised within the policies of that agency.  It does not, in itself, establish physical unfitness for Department of the Army purposes.

3. A separation physical, performed by a competent medical doctor determined that the applicant did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing.  Therefore, there was no basis for physical disability retirement or separation. 

4.  Therefore the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefor were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION



						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707458C070209

    Original file (9707458C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay. That without the additional military medical information requested, nor further medical advisory was warranted. An award of a VA rating does not establish entitlement to medical retirement or separation from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707458

    Original file (9707458.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. That without the additional military medical information requested, nor further medical advisory was warranted. Further, his enlistment in the Army Reserve on 30 September 1992, one day after his separation, directly contradicts his contention that he believes that he was physically unfit for further military service at the time of separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012048

    Original file (20080012048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The TERA was available only to Soldiers serving in an excess specialty and the applicant's MOS was not one of the specialties designated at the time of the applicant’s discharge; accordingly, he was not entitled to consideration under that program. The applicant's contention that he was not informed of the provisions of the VSI have also been noted; however, he was not entitled to consideration under that program because his grade and specialty was not announced as one of the specialties...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011646C070208

    Original file (20040011646C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He notes the rating was effective on 28 March 1995 and the medical conditions which served as the basis for his VA disability rating were related to his military service. According to the applicant's VA rating documents, in March 1995 he was granted a combined disability rating of 30 percent. The evidence of record indicates he did not have any medically unfitting disability which required physical disability processing.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03096973C070212

    Original file (03096973C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ultimately, the applicant notes that he was released from the United States Army Reserve for unfitness, but could not be retired because the disease occurred while he was on active duty. Neither the applicant’s service medical record nor his Official Military Personnel File was available to the Board. He has presented no evidence that his request for reclassification or his request for separation under the VSI program was “forced” on him because of his medical conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496

    Original file (20140011496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004802

    Original file (20110004802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's medical records contain no evidence to show he was medically unfit, disabled, or unable to perform his military duties. There is no evidence in the applicant's medical record, and the applicant has not provided any evidence, to show he should have been sent through a medical evaluation board prior to discharge. Further, the applicant's records show that after enlisting in the USAR he received a physical showing he had no physical limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064450C070421

    Original file (2001064450C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to reflect that he elected separation from active Army under the Variable Separation Incentive (VSI) Program instead of the Special Separation Benefit (SSB) Program. Initially, only a non-monetary, voluntary separation program was announced providing retirement opportunities for some soldiers who had less than 20 but more than 15 years of active military service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057759C070420

    Original file (2001057759C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That he should have received a complete physical examination before being discharged from the Army Reserves. The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 6 years on 16 May 1977. The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 3 years on 22 August 1992.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608678C070209

    Original file (9608678C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In support of his application, he submits copies of his military medical records, and Social Security and VA medical evaluations. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties before he or she can be medically retired or separated.