Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510728C070209
Original file (9510728C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that he be granted an honorable discharge.

APPLICANT STATES:  In effect, that he has two discharges for the same period of service--one honorable and the other, dishonorable.  He provides a copy of a partially burned DD Form 214, Report of Separation or Transfer from the Armed Forces of the United States, which he purports to be an honorable discharge.  He also provides a NA Form 13038, Certificate of Military Service, provided him by the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri, in 1995 which characterizes his service as dishonorable.

COUNSEL CONTENDS:  NA

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973.  Information herein was obtained from the record of his trial by court-martial and from reconstructed personnel records.

He was born on 12 October 1930 and enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 31 August 1949.  Following completion of the required military training, he was assigned to a unit in Korea.

On 24 December 1950, the applicant and two fellow soldiers left their compound to go hunting.  The applicant and another soldier were armed with carbines and the third soldier was armed with an M1 rifle.  As the roamed the nearby hills, the trio came upon a 10 year old Korean boy approximately 350 yards away in the valley below them.  The applicant suggested that they shoot at the boy to frighten him.  He and the other soldier armed with a carbine began firing at the child, who began to run.  After running 25-30 yards, the child fell face down and was motionless.  Shortly thereafter, the trio of soldiers was confronted by a distraught Korean father covered in blood and carrying his son’s shoes.  The soldiers did not understand him and simply walked away.  The Korean father brought his child to an Army Aid Station where a doctor pronounced the boy dead.  He had been shot once through the back of the head with a high velocity rifle and there was a large exit wound in the upper right side of his skull.  The matter was reported to the military authorities.

The applicant and his two friends were apprehended and he and the other soldier who fired at the boy were charged with premeditated murder and absence without leave (AWOL) from 5-16 January 1951.  The applicant and his co-defendant were tried separately by general courts-martial.  Although he pleaded not guilty, the applicant was convicted of unpremeditated murder and AWOL.  He was sentenced to a DD, 10 years’ confinement in a Federal penitentiary, and total forfeiture of all pay and allowances.

The Military Justice Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-209), provides, in pertinent part, that military correction boards may not disturb the finality of a conviction by court-martial 

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  The applicant is confused.  The partially burned DD Form 214 which he believes to be an honorable discharge is, in fact, a dishonorable discharge.  The information presented on the NA Form 13038, Certificate of Military Service, accurately reflects that DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant was convicted by a general court-martial for his part in killing a 10 year old boy.  Trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged.  Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the heinous misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.


BOARD VOTE:

                              GRANT          

                              GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                              DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006627C070208

    Original file (20040006627C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence that shows the FSM's superiors made it hard on him because he was black or documentation that shows white Soldiers refused to take orders from him. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000349C070208

    Original file (20040000349C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    One daughter was an alcoholic who abandoned her children, three of whom were being raised by the applicant. At age 11, the applicant states he was placed in school in Warm Springs, Oregon. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019864

    Original file (20080019864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 21 June 1954 to show that he held the rank of staff sergeant and primary military occupational specialty (MOS) of Supply Sergeant (1821) at the time of his discharge. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 for the period of 15 July 1951 through 21 June 1954 should be corrected to show: a. that he held the rank of staff sergeant and MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015082

    Original file (20110015082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 1 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015082 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his record to show he received a general discharge (GD). The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078283C070215

    Original file (2002078283C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The prosecution presented evidence showing that the two Vietnamese youths were in a tent talking with two American soldiers, Private First Class (PFC) P____ and PFC J____ when the applicant came in to get his gear. • A family friend writes that she has known the applicant for 25 years. The applicant is always available to help anyone who needs help.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004147

    Original file (20120004147.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120004147 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's complete military record is not available to the Board for review. In view of the available evidence, there is an insufficient basis to support granting further clemency in this case.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002409

    Original file (0002409.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neither the policeman who performed CPR nor the responding doctor found any sign that the child was choking on her bottle or that she had vomited, as claimed by the applicant. The cause of death, in the opinion of the doctor, was injuries to the child’s brain. A review of the medical records convinced the doctor that the cause of applicant’s daughter’s injuries was a severe and violent shaking.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004112

    Original file (20120004112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Other then the applicant's own recollection, there is no available evidence showing he was injured by an explosion in the ROK during the Korean War.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015000C071029

    Original file (20060015000C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The IG report noted that prior to the riot there had been minor altercations in the post exchange between “Negroes” and Italians, and even between Italians and white American Soldiers. During the IG investigation, one of the Italian witnesses, Mag___, was asked about a “Negro” MP. The lead defense counsel had 9 days from service of the charges on the applicant and on 42 other accused to prepare for trial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021203

    Original file (20090021203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-3 on 11 December 2001 for 3 years. The applicant's supervisor testified he had been and continued to be an outstanding Soldier in his unit. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted pursuant to his guilty pleas by a special court-martial adjudged on 15 August 2005 and discharged on 26 October 2007 pursuant to the approved sentence of a special court-martial.