Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510712C070209
Original file (9510712C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that he be retained in an active Reserve status and that he be reconsidered for promotion to the rank of captain after he receives at least one additional officer evaluation report from his Reserve unit.

APPLICANT STATES:  In effect, that he was unaware that he was being considered for promotion to the rank of captain until he received notification of his nonselection and impending discharge on 12 June 1995.  He further states that he had difficulty obtaining his promotion orders for promotion to first lieutenant and even more difficulty in finding a Reserve unit he could join.  However, he was able to find a unit in Seoul, Korea, where he could fulfill the unit’s needs and would allow him to branch transfer.  He goes on to state that he desires to continue his affiliation with the USAR and would like to be retained in an active Reserve status until such time as he can branch transfer and has time to receive at least one OER in his current position. 

COUNSEL CONTENDS:VFW COMMENTS 

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 19 December 1987.  He completed the engineer officer basic course in March 1989 and was subsequently promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 18 December 1990.

He was considered for promotion to the rank of captain by the 1994 and 1995 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Boards and was not selected.  Consequently, the applicant was notified that he was to be discharged from the USAR as a result of his nonselection.

In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion (COPY ATTACHED) was obtained from the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN).  It opined, in effect, that the applicant’s records were complete (as best as could be determined) when seen by the selection boards and that the applicant had no basis for reconsideration by a Standby Advisory Board.

Army Regulation 135-175, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of Reserve Component officer personnel.  Chapter 4 of that regulation describes the conditions under which Army Reserve officers may be discharged from their status as Reserves of the Army.  

Paragraph 4-4a of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that members of the Army Reserve will be removed from an active status and discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible), within 90 days after the board reports its findings, for nonselection for promotion after the second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components selection board if the officer is in the grade of first lieutenant, captain or major (Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3846).

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  While it is unfortunate that the applicant has been unable to actively participate in the USAR, his inability to do so does not constitute an error or injustice on the part of the Department.  Inasmuch as he has failed to show that his discharge from the USAR based on his being twice nonselected for promotion to the rank of captain was the result of an error or injustice, there is no basis to allow him to remain in an active Reserve status. 

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007799C071029

    Original file (20070007799C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a 7 August 2006 letter from HRC-STL to his Congressman, which indicated the applicant had been identified to, but removed from, the 2000 CPT, Army Promotion List, Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) due to his time spent in the Inactive Army National Guard as of 1 February 2000. Department of the Army Personnel Policy Guidance, chapter 13, states that a commissioned officer who is notified of a two-time nonselect for promotion, and is not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069937C070402

    Original file (2002069937C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he served as an enlisted member of the Army National Guard in Pennsylvania and then New Jersey, from 24 April 1980 through 26 June 1987. The applicant was correctly discharged according to regulation and law for two-time nonselection for promotion to CPT and is not eligible to be reinstated in the Reserve as an officer beyond the correction date of 12 February 2001 above, although he may be eligible to enlist which can be determined by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000143C070208

    Original file (20040000143C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was twice considered for promotion to captain but not selected. Army Regulation 135-100 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the Army) provides guidance on the eligibility criteria for appointment of Reserve officers. Army Regulation 135-175 states, in pertinent part, that officers in the grade of first lieutenant, captain, or major, who completed their statutory military obligation, will be discharged for failure to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605380C070209

    Original file (9605380C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although promotion boards do not divulge the reasons for selection or nonselection of officers for promotion, it is known that her nonselection was not related to her not having a baccalaureate degree, as she was commissioned in 1980 and the requirement only applied to Army Nurse Corps officers commissioned on or after 1 October 1986. Not only is there no evidence in the available records to support such a contention, the applicant has also not submitted any evidence which would suggest...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075153C070403

    Original file (2002075153C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his nonselections for promotion to major by the 1998 and 1999 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) be removed from his records. On 2 August 1998, the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, PERSCOM, issued a memorandum notifying the applicant, through the Mississippi ARNG, that he had been considered and not selected for promotion to major based on the lack of required military education by a board that convened on 9 March 1998. BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083371C070212

    Original file (2003083371C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was informed that, since the records showed that he had declined promotion to major, his promotion to major had been adjusted to 1 October 1985 and his name was removed from the 1989 and 1990 promotion board results. There is no evidence of record, or evidence provided by the applicant or counsel, that a promotion memorandum was ever issued for LTC. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant is not entitled to any of these claims and this Board specifically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509596C070209

    Original file (9509596C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, promotion reconsideration to the rank of captain in the USAR. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: The applicant was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 16 May 1986. It opined that a review of the applicant’s records revealed that his records were complete when considered by the 1993 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board and that the applicant has no basis for reconsideration by a promotion advisory board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003484

    Original file (20090003484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his status in the Retired Reserve be corrected to show he is assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). Army Regulation 135-175 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Separation of Officers) states in pertinent part, that members of the Army Reserve not selected for promotion to major after a second consideration who have completed the officer's statutory military service obligation will be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020640

    Original file (20120020640.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) to major (O-4) to 17 July 2003. c. ARNG promotion to lieutenant colonel (O-5), year group 2009. d. Waivers of military education requirements for O-5 promotion. On 21 February 2007, the applicant was notified he had been selected for promotion to major by an SSB with a promotion eligibility date of 17 July 2003. Revoking his discharge from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army, dated 1 February 2004. b.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000374C070208

    Original file (20040000374C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he received an OER for the period 1 May 1989 through 30 April 1990. The evidence of record shows that the applicant contacted USAHRC – STL (AR-PERSCOM at the time) in October 2001 concerning reappointment and was told to contact another office to see if he was eligible. There is insufficient evidence on which to justify a correction to the applicant's records (such as showing that he was discharged from the USAR prior to being twice nonselected for promotion to...