2. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to show that his rank and pay grade at the time of his discharge on 30 November 1994 was Sergeant First Class (SFC), pay grade E-7, vice Staff Sergeant (SSG), pay grade E-6; and that this form be changed to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 3d oak leaf cluster (OLC), vice ARCOM 2nd OLC.
3. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 was prepared prior to his promotion to SFC and prior to the amendment of the order awarding him the ARCOM.
4. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) order number
21-37, dated 8 November 1994, indicates that the applicant was promoted to SFC effective and with a date of rank of
1 December 1994. So much of that order concerning the applicant was revoked by PERSCOM on 24 June 1996.
5. A 16 June 1995 Fort Knox, Kentucky endorsement to a
30 November 1994 permanent order shows that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM 3d OLC.
6. The applicant was discharged from the Army on
30 November 1994 as a Staff Sergeant, pay grade E-6, one day prior to the effective date of his promotion to SFC E-7, in order to accept an appointment as a warrant officer.
7. The applicant was appointed as a Reserve warrant officer of the Army on 1 December 1994.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was awarded the ARCOM 3d OLC and his
DD Form 214 should be changed accordingly.
2. The applicants rank and pay grade, Staff Sergeant E-6, at the time of his discharge on 30 November 1994, is correct.
3. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicants record as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the ARCOM 3d OLC.
2. That so much of the application as in excess of the foregoing be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
GRANT FORMAL HEARING
DENY APPLICATION
CHAIRPERSON
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026727
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there are no orders in his records and he has no orders showing more than three awards of the AAM. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003039
The applicant requests a retroactive promotion to master sergeant (MSG)/E-8 and consideration for promotion to sergeant major (SGM)/E-9. f. as noted in the supporting endorsements of the BSM award recommendation, both the Battalion Commander and Special Forces Task Force Commander in Desert Shield/Storm and Group Commander stated that had this information been known at the time the award of the BSM would have been made in 1991. g. he requests the recently-approved BSM be used for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065642C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. It states, in pertinent part, that enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily as determined by the Secretary of the Army. By law and regulation, enlisted members of the Army are placed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609487C070209
Also, he requests correction of his records to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code which would allow enlistment. The U.S. Army Enlistment Eligibility Activity (USAEEA), in a comment, opined that the reentry code RE-3C is correct as shown on the applicants DD Form 214 in accordance with table 3-6, Army Regulation 601-210, dated 14 February 1990. The reentry code of RE-3C applies to persons who have completed more than 4 months service who do not meet the basic eligibility pay grade...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067716C070402
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show entitlement to award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) for service in Desert Storm, completion of the Instruction/Operator Training Course (Exportable) during the period 13 to 17 July 1987, completion of the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle (BFV) Gunner Course on 26 June 1987, and the BFV Master Gunner Course completed on 25 May 1989. Army Regulation 635-5 also indicates that, under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058087C070420
Title 10, United States Code, Section 3964, provides that a retired enlisted member or warrant officer of the Army who is retired with less than 30 years of active service is entitled, when his active service plus his service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which he served on active duty satisfactorily. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant voluntarily submitted his application for retirement and this request was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074854C070403
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that all documents relating to his request for correction/removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) of a Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for the period February 1994 through January 1995 be removed from the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his OMPF; that the NCOERs on file in his record dating from 1 July 1996 be corrected to reflect service in the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7, (SFC/E-7), vice staff sergeant/E-6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071116C070402
This order also contained special instructions indicating that those members accepting a conditional promotion and who are subsequently denied enrollment, declared a no-show, become an academic failure or otherwise do not meet graduation requirements of the required Noncommissioned Education System (NCOES) course would be reduced to the grade and rank held prior to the conditional promotion. On 25 February 2002, the applicant’s battalion commander submitted a request to this Board, asking...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007507
The applicant states, in effect, that her promotion was not received upon retirement according to AR 600-8-19, that she did not receive her award until after she retired, and that there is no disability rating identified on her DD Form 214. Orders 05-122, dated 23 August 2006, issued by the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri promoted the applicant from pay grade E-6 to pay grade E-7 with an effective date of rank of 23 August 2006. The evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056538C070420
The applicant provides the front page from a Recommendation for Award (for other than Valor) of Army Achievement Medal (AAM), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), DA Form 638, dated 20 May 1992, in which he was recommended for the ARCOM 4 th OLC for the period 6 March - 19 May 1992. The DA Form 638 indicates that his previous awards included the ARCOM 2d OLC. On 7 July 2001, PERSCOM indicated to an analyst with the Board that it could not be determined...