Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510399C070209
Original file (9510399C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that his records be corrected to show that he was over-prescribed medicines.

APPLICANT STATES:  That “his kidneys were unable to absorb the medicine, causing other medical problems, such as, swelling of body by 30 pounds of fluid and food passing through after eating”.  He alleges to have been over medicated on three occasions.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military and medical records show:

On 27 May 1943, he was inducted into the Army of the United States, reporting to active duty on 10 June 1943.

During his period of active duty, he was treated for a deviated nasal septum, cellulitis and tonsillitis.
During the period 3 July 1944-25 December 1945, he served in the European Theater of Operations.

On 12 January 1946, he was honorably separated, under AR 615-365, based on the convenience of the Government and demobilization.  His Report of Separation indicates he had  2 years, 7 months and 2 days of creditable service.

On 26 August 1949, A VA Rating Sheet established service-connection of 0 percent for Teeth.

On 6 October 1986, in a VA Report of Medical Examination for Disability Evaluation, the applicant complains of “knees, elbows (and) knuckles swelling and ach(ing); cramps in legs from hips down to feet; a lot of cramps in the bottom of his feet; a hernia keeps popping in and out; back bothers him a lot; some prostrate problems; ears itch a lot; mouth dry with film build up on tongue and swelling; eyes bother some; some chest pains; upset stomach and planes buzzing.”

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

2.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  There is no evidence of record that the applicant was over prescribed medications during his period of active duty.

4.  The fact that the VA, in its discretion, has awarded the applicant a disability rating is a prerogative exercised within the polices of that agency.  It does not, in itself, establish physical unfitness for Department of the Army purposes. 

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068831C070402

    Original file (2002068831C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On an unknown date, he was treated for chronic athlete’s feet and advised to continue his medications (cream and powder). On 13 June 1980, the applicant stated “treatment (for feet) is helping a lot.” On 17 June 1980, he was treated for stomach cramps. He consented to be voluntarily discharged and there is evidence in his discharge packet statement and in his medical records to show he wanted to be discharged as early as February 1980.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00918

    Original file (PD 2012 00918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Painful Feet Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Painful...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01284

    Original file (ND04-01284.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-01284 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040810. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). I tried to work three different times.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03085

    Original file (BC-2004-03085.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Veterans Administration Clinic Record, Neuropsychiatric Examination, dated 15 June 1950 indicated the applicant was shot down on his second mission over the North Sea and was a POW from December 1943 to May 1945 in Germany. EXAMINER NOTE: The applicant claims he was a POW; however, there is no evidence of POW status in his military records. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 December 2004.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020672

    Original file (20090020672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) did not give his back [pain] a rating, despite a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) physician's finding that it was an unfitting condition. The PEB, under the authority of the USAPDA, will consider the results of the MEB, as well as the requirements of the Soldier’s MOS, in determining fitness. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for disability ratings for back pain, arthritis in a toe, his hips, and migraine headaches.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00387

    Original file (PD-2014-00387.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRDstandards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. She reported GI symptoms 8 months out of the year. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPresidentDoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00821

    Original file (PD2013 00821.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition to that diagnosis, he also listed diagnoses of chronic pain syndrome, bilateral foot pain, bilateral shoulder pain with right shoulder arthrosis, low back pain status-post surgery and chronic bilateral knee pain with retropatellar pain syndrome.At the MEB exam on 14 May 2001(7 months prior to entry on TDRL),the CI reported that he could not perform his duties because of pain in his upper back, lower back, shoulders, hips, legs, knees, feet, hands and neck.At the VA Compensation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00867

    Original file (PD2013 00867.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 24 January 2007 clinic record entry reflected the CI reported medication was working well for his headaches but had recurred when he ran out of medication.At a VA C&P examination, dated 23 July 2007, 5 months after separation, the CI reported two headaches per week, but added that he was not incapacitated by headaches, and had lost “no time from work due to headache.”The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB found the headaches unfitting...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02585

    Original file (PD-2013-02585.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was issued an L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).“Ankle pain” and “chronic bilateral foot pain” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007195

    Original file (20140007195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's medical records show: a. The applicant provided a VA Form 21-4138, dated 14 April 2014, wherein she stated she incurred a heat stroke while performing her basic training duties on or about 31 May 1979 which was misdiagnosed by the treating physician at the base hospital. Heat stroke is the most serious form of heat injury and is considered a medical emergency.