Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510368C070209
Original file (9510368C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his Army Achievement Medal (AAM) be upgraded to an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

APPLICANT STATES:  That in February 1988 his commander informed him that he was being recommended for the ARCOM.  On 28 March 1988, after his discharge, he received the AAM with no explanation why the award was downgraded.  He contends that he had a good record and should have been awarded the ARCOM.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years on 6 June 1984 and was honorably separated in pay grade E-5 per his request, pursuant to an early transition program.  His awards include the AAM, the Good Conduct Medal, the NCO Professional Development Ribbon, the Army Service Ribbon, the Army Superior Unit Award, and the Air Assault Badge.

The applicant was awarded the AAM for meritorious service upon completion of his service on 28 March 1988.  The record contains no evidence to show that he was recommended for an ARCOM.

Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides in pertinent part, that the decision to award an individual a decoration and the decision as to which award is appropriate are both subjective decisions made by the commander having award approval authority.  No individual is automatically entitled to an award upon departure from an assignment.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any evidence to indicate that a prejudicial error occurred in awarding him the AAM.

2.  Notwithstanding his contention that he had a good record, award determinations are subjective decisions by the commander concerned and in the absence of evidence of error, it would be inappropriate for this Board to arbitrarily upgrade his award.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there appears to be no basis for granting the applicantÂ’s request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009397C070206

    Original file (20050009397C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders show he received the first award of the AAM for the period 9 January 1990 through 28 January 1990; the second award of the AAM for the period 15 July 1988 through 5 November 1991; and a third award of the AAM for the period 15 June 1988 through 15 December 1991. Although the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded ASI "Q9," there is no evidence of record which shows he completed the Traffic Accident Investigation Course. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015142

    Original file (20090015142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an additional award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and two additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Evidence of record contains orders that support two awards of the AAM. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he was awarded a third award of the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003423

    Original file (20110003423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (3d Oak Leaf Cluster), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (3d Award), Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) (1st Award), and the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) or Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) for Operation Golden Pheasant. The evidence of record does not show the applicant served in a unit during a period for which the unit received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010452C080407

    Original file (20070010452C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier petition requesting that his Army Achievement Medal (AAM) be upgraded to an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); and that his Army National Guard (ARNG) separation document (NGB Form 22) be corrected by adding all awards, badges, schools, and deployments. He claims the following awards and badges were erroneously omitted from his NGB Form 22: Army Service Ribbon (ASR); Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010452

    Original file (20070010452.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier petition requesting that his Army Achievement Medal (AAM) be upgraded to an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); and that his Army National Guard (ARNG) separation document (NGB Form 22) be corrected by adding all awards, badges, schools, and deployments. He claims the following awards and badges were erroneously omitted from his NGB Form 22: Army Service Ribbon (ASR); Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006985

    Original file (20140006985.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant's service in support of ODS in SWA qualified him for award of the: (1) SWASM and he participated in three campaigns during his service in SWA. d. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 29 April 1988 through 28 April 1991. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008753

    Original file (20090008753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to document his foreign service and all earned awards. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy. As a result, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record and DD Form 214 to document SWA service from 1 January through 13 June 1991, as confirmed by the DFAS record by amending item 12f and item 18 accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026727

    Original file (20100026727.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there are no orders in his records and he has no orders showing more than three awards of the AAM. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067716C070402

    Original file (2002067716C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show entitlement to award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) for service in Desert Storm, completion of the Instruction/Operator Training Course (Exportable) during the period 13 to 17 July 1987, completion of the Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicle (BFV) Gunner Course on 26 June 1987, and the BFV Master Gunner Course completed on 25 May 1989. Army Regulation 635-5 also indicates that, under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003771

    Original file (20130003771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his awards of the Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (second award), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with four oak leaf clusters (OLCs), Army Achievement Medal (AAM) with four OLCs, Italian Parachutist Badge, and completion of the psychological operations specialist course and Basic Haitian Creole course. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not properly reflect his...