Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509747C070209
Original file (9509747C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that the separation program designator (SPD) code on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge, be corrected to show that bonuses are not to be recouped.

3.  He states that the bonus he received was for a military occupational specialty (MOS) that the Army chose to delete. His departure from the service was not because of anything he did or did not do.

4.  His military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 October 1989 for 6 years for training as a tank systems mechanic with a cash bonus enlistment option.  The contract he signed states “ If my subsequent disqual-ification is neither voluntary nor my fault, I will not be required to repay any portion of the bonus.”  He was honorably discharged 3 October 1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 7-16b for an unfulfilled enlistment contract.  The SPD code on his DD Form 214 is KDS, indicating that he was separated in accordance with the aforementioned paragraph of the Army regulation.

5.  He successfully completed advanced individual training and was awarded the bonus MOS for which he had enlisted.  Accordingly, on 25 April 1990 he received the enlistment bonus in the amount of $4500.00.

6.  On 29 July 1991 the soldier was informed that the Army intended to discontinue his MOS.  In accordance with the options available to him, he could accept reclassification into another MOS or request discharge because of an unfulfilled enlistment contract.  He opted for discharge.

7.  A member of the staff of the Board contacted the Defense Finance and Accounting Service and ascertained that the enlistment bonus paid to the applicant had been recouped.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 7-16b, provides in pertinent part that an unfulfilled enlistment commitment exists when the soldier received a written enlistment commitment from recruiting personnel for which the soldier

was qualified, but which cannot be fulfilled by the Army and the soldier did not knowingly take part in the creation of the unfulfilled enlistment commitment.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator Codes, provides in pertinent part, that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty.  The sole purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation.  They are intended exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data.

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There was no error in the SPD code assigned at the time of his separation.  SPD code KDS is consistent with the regulation governing the reason for his discharge.

2.  His enlistment contract provides, however, that if his disqualification for service is neither voluntary or his fault, and his was not, he would not be required to repay any portion of the bonus.  Under the circumstances, there is no justification to recoup his bonus.

3.  Accordingly, it would be equitable and just to return any enlistment bonus that was recouped from him.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by reimbursing the individual concerned that portion of the enlistment bonus that was recouped from him to include interest and penalties, as a result of his premature discharge.




BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




					____________________________
						CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014916

    Original file (20130014916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records show to he fulfilled his enlistment commitment. On 8 June 1985, the applicant submitted a request for immediate separation from active duty due to his unfulfilled enlistment contract. On 8 June 1985, the applicant voluntarily submitted a request for immediate separation from active duty due to his unfulfilled enlistment contract.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015880

    Original file (20060015880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion further indicates that regarding cases when Soldiers are separated for an unfulfilled contract or in doubtful cases, commanders have the option to request a waiver of recoupment provisions. Memoranda provided by the applicant's chain of command and career counselor both concur that the Department of the Army breached the terms of the applicant's reenlistment contract; therefore, the applicant is not obligated to repay the reenlistment bonus. Considering there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100335C070208

    Original file (2004100335C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that a change to the SPD code in question is necessary in order for the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to remit the debt he incurred based on his receipt of a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The separation regulation further states that when it is determined that an enlistment is defective or cannot be fulfilled, a Regular Army soldier serving on a second or later enlistment, having been discharged from a previous enlistment before ETS to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022869

    Original file (AR20110022869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I received certificates of appreciation for my volunteering for duties, and it is because of this and my 170+ days of excellent service that I request my separation be changed from uncharacterized to honorable." Soldiers separated under this Chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under Chapter 3, section II. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009628

    Original file (20080009628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. In the applicant and counsel’s request to grant the applicant pro rata of recoupment of any SRB already paid by installments based upon the percentage of service completed, counsel provides many in-depth trains of logic which address whether the applicant obtained his SRB through fraud, whether the applicant’s discharge from his erroneous reenlistment contract constituted...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015027

    Original file (AR20080015027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Soldiers separated under this chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under chapter 3, section II. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003443

    Original file (AR20080003443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 7, paragraph 7-16, AR 635-200, by reason of defective enlistment, inability of the U.S. Army to fulfill the former soldier’s enlistment agreement, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Soldiers separated under this chapter will be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004612

    Original file (AR20110004612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Soldiers separated under this Chapter may be awarded an honorable discharge unless an entry level status separation is required under Chapter 3, section II. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004068

    Original file (20090004068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004068 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's request for separation based on pregnancy was not initiated until 17 October 2007, 5 full weeks after her son's birth. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing on her DD Form 214 her narrative reason for her separation as dependency; b. showing the authority for her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012964

    Original file (20100012964.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 37, U.S. Code, section 303a(e)(1) states a member who receives a bonus shall repay an amount equal to the unearned portion of the bonus if the member fails to satisfy the eligibility requirements and may not receive any unpaid amounts of the bonus after the member fails to satisfy the requirements, unless the Secretary concerned determines that the imposition of the repayment requirement and termination of the payment of unpaid amounts of the bonus would be contrary to a personnel...