Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509319C070209
Original file (9509319C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to general.  The applicant states that he sold marijuana on two occasions to a drug suppression team agent, however, there were mitigating circumstances, in that he did this at the request of an NCO, and not for profit.  When apprehended, he requested legal assistance, and ultimately was advised to request a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He states that he has learned from his mistake, that he was wrong and naive, and realizes that this discharge will stay with him all his life.     

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

The applicant entered the Army on 7 December 1983, completed training and was assigned to Fort Knox, Kentucky.

On 3 September 1985 the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ, for failure to go to his place of duty and for disobeying a lawful order.  On 
19 February 1986 he received a letter of reprimand for driving after drinking.

On 3 April 1986 the applicant consulted with counsel and voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10.  He stated that he understood the elements of the offense(s) charged and was guilty of the charge(s) or of a lesser included offense which also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  The applicant stated that he understood the nature and consequences of the other than honorable conditions discharge that he might receive.  He declined to make a statement in his own behalf.

The applicant’s commanding officer recommended that the applicant’s request be approved and that he receive an other than honorable conditions discharge, based on the applicant’s substandard job performance and his numerous military and civilian criminal convictions.  

On 25 April 1986 the separation authority approved the request and directed that the applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions.  He was discharged at Fort Knox on 12 May 1986.  He had 2 years, 5 months, and 6 days of service.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
 
There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 
12 May 1986, the date of his discharge.  The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 12 May 1989.

The application is dated 10 July 1995 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

                      EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

                      GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                      CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




		Karl F. Schneider
		Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000386

    Original file (20090000386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he would like for the Board [Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)] to upgrade his discharge to a general discharge under honorable conditions. The record shows that on 15 May 1990 the applicant was discharged accordingly. Further, the applicant's discharge reflects his overall record of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017660

    Original file (20090017660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 July 1986, the appropriate authority approved the applicant's request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that he be reduced to pay grade E-1 and issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Based on the available evidence, there is no basis for the upgrade of his discharge to either a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017377C070206

    Original file (20050017377C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. The evidence of record clearly shows that he acknowledged in his request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial that he understood that there were no automatic provisions for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019500

    Original file (20080019500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate authority approved his request on 6 December 1989 and directed that he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. Paragraph 3-7b of Army Regulation 635-200 provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. _______XXX_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006660

    Original file (20120006660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 June 1986, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and after being advised of the basis of the contemplated trial by court-martial and the maximum permissible punishment under the UCMJ, the possible effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions, and the rights and procedures available to him, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009258

    Original file (20130009258.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. On 21 October 1986, the separation authority approved his request to be discharged for the good of the service. However, the available evidence does not support upgrade of his UOTHC discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011132C070208

    Original file (20040011132C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was a member of the Army National Guard until 1 May 1985 when he was discharged and received a general discharge certificate. Other than his separation order, documents associated with his 1985 discharge from the Army National Guard were not in records available to the Board. The fact that there is no indication the applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf as part of his 1986 request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial which might have explained...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005414

    Original file (20140005414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, his under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. Further, the applicant's discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030280

    Original file (20100030280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was also AWOL during the period 28 January to 5 April 1986. He acknowledged he understood if his discharge request was approved he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010272

    Original file (20050010272.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 22 February 1983. On 14 January 1986, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive an UOTHC discharge. On 14 February 1986, the applicant was discharged accordingly.