Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508987C070209
Original file (9508987C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3.  He states, in effect, that he was notified that he has 20 years of qualifying service for USAR retired pay at age 60 and should have been placed in the Retired Reserve and not discharged.  He further states that he received his   20-year letter on 5 June 1989 and submitted his Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate on 3 October 1989.  However, instead of being placed in the Retired Reserve, he was discharged. 

4.  The applicant's military records show that he was notified at his address in Pennsylvania by the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) on 22 May 1989 that he had attained eligibility for USAR retired pay, upon application, at age 60 (20 year letter).

5.  On 19 November 1990, the ARPERCEN sent a memorandum to  the applicant at his former address in South Carolina, notifying him that he had completed the maximum allowable service and that he must be discharged or retired by 5 November 1990.  The memorandum indicates that no reply was received by the ARPERCEN as of 11 February 1991.  

6.  On 19 February 1991 the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR in the rank of lieutenant colonel. The discharge order was also mailed to the applicant’s former address in South Carolina.

7.  Army Regulation 140-10, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the assignment, attachment, detail and transfer of Army Reserve soldiers.  Chapter 7 of the regulation relates to the removal of soldiers from active status and states, in pertinent part, that soldiers removed from active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve.  

8.  Due to recent Departmental changes, certain benefits, such as commissary and post exchange privileges, accrue to Reservists with more than 20 of qualifying service who are transferred to the Retired Reserve that do not accrue to those who are discharged.  

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's honorable discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time, since the applicant did not request transfer to the Retired Reserve before discharge orders were published.

2.  However, it is reasonable to presume that had the option letter been sent to the applicant's correct address, he would have elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

3.  The foregoing conclusion is supported by the fact that the ARPERCEN sent the applicant’s 20-year letter to his address in Pennsylvania, yet sent all subsequent notifications to his old address in South Carolina.  Consequently, as a result of an apparent administrative error, the applicant was denied the opportunity to request transfer to the Retired Reserve which has resulted in an injustice to him.

4.  In view of the foregoing and since the applicant meets the eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his records as recommended below.

RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected:

	a.  by voiding the 19 February 1991 discharge from the Army Reserve of the individual concerned; and

	b.  by showing that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 19 February 1991.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609757C070209

    Original file (9609757C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, that the Army did not properly account for his qualifying service for retired pay at age 60, and that he is sure he had served 20 qualifying years at the time his civilian job required him to be transferred from Florida to South Carolina. On 22 April 1977 the ARPERCEN sent the applicant a notice of nonparticipation in the USAR, again to his former address, notifying him that he must either request a waiver of a nonqualifying year, request transfer to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610340C070209

    Original file (9610340C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. He states that until he submitted a request to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in 1994 he was under the impression that he was assigned to the USAR Control Group (Individual Ready Reserve) because he continued to receive statements of his retirement points. In view of the foregoing and since the applicant meets the eligibility requirements for assignment to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9608861C070209

    Original file (9608861C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. He states, in effect, that he was not given the opportunity to be transferred to the Retired Reserve and that when he requested transfer to the Retired Reserve in October 1994, because of the frustration he was experiencing in not receiving answers to his letters to the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), he was informed by a letter from the ARPERCEN dated 22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059198C070421

    Original file (2001059198C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. This office opined that the discharge orders issued were valid and in accordance with Army regulations; however, recommended that authority should be given to void the discharge orders and allow the applicant to transfer to the Retired Reserve as he desires. As stated in the advisory opinion, he requests that authority be given to void the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607938C070209

    Original file (9607938C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. However, it is reasonable to presume that had the applicant been given the proper guidance regarding transfer to the Retired Reserve prior to his being discharged from the USAR, he would have elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve because he had received the notification indicating his eligibility for receipt of Reserve retired pay at age 60. In view of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511563C070209

    Original file (9511563C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 23 December 1965 and was promoted to the rank of captain on 8 July 1969. On 18 October 1990 the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) sent the applicant a notice informing him that he had been twice nonselected for promotion to the rank of lieutenant colonel and that he was required to complete and return an option selection form within 30 days or he would be discharged in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090860C070212

    Original file (2003090860C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter to her from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command dated 3 April 2003; the FSM's death certificate; the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) with counseling letter; the FSM's notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter); a North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) letter dated 14 November 1999; the FSM's Retired Reserve certificate dated 12 August 1988; the FSM's Honorable Discharge certificate dated 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9607939C070209

    Original file (9607939C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. He states, in effect, that he was not given the opportunity to be transferred to the Retired Reserve. In view of the foregoing and since the applicant meets the eligibility requirements for assignment to the Retired Reserve, it would be equitable and just to correct his military records by voiding his discharge of 30 September 1987 and assigning him to the Retired...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609594C070209

    Original file (9609594C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his discharge from the USAR be voided and that he instead be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The applicant's honorable discharge from the USAR was accomplished in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. However, it appears that the applicant was not informed that he was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve and that he was eligible to receive his 20-year letter, which was issued to the applicant over 4 years after his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009174

    Original file (20060009174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion pointed out that the applicant did not have enough years to obtain a 20-Year Letter or to be assigned to the Retired Reserve. As the advisory opinion pointed out, the applicant’s command did not have his medical records at that time (i.e., when he reenlisted and was transferred to the IRR), and he should have been extended with the unit to obtain a medical determination and not reenlisted into the IRR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...