Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508082C070209
Original file (9508082C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, correction of his records to show that he was commissioned as a USAR officer on 13 May 1980 with appropriate constructive service credit and changes to his basic pay entry date (BPED) and basic active service date (BASD).

APPLICANT STATES:  In effect, that he was unjustly denied the opportunity to fulfill his ROTC obligation in the USAR and was forced to enter active duty contrary to his agreement and at great expense to him which has imposed a serious financial hardship on him and his family.  He further states that he was also misinformed that he could not be commissioned in the USAR while he under an approved delay for educational reasons which was untrue and has resulted in his being commissioned 2 years later than he should have been.  Additionally, he contends that he has not been given the appropriate amount of constructive service credit which has resulted in his BASD and BPED being computed incorrectly and his not receiving the correct amount of pay and allowances. 

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

On 25 August 1978 the applicant signed an ROTC contract agreement as a non-scholarship cadet enrolling in the advanced course at Alcorn State University.  As part of his contract he agreed in paragraph 1e(1), to serve as a commissioned officer for 6 years, to include an initial period of active duty of not less than 3 years, or if the Army did not require his service on active duty, he would serve and participate satisfactorily in the USAR for a period of 8 years.  He was commissioned as a USAR second lieutenant on 17 December 1982.

On 5 May 1983 he submitted an application for initial (educational) delay from entry on active duty for the purpose of attending medical school.  His request was approved on 13 June 1983. 

The applicant was again commissioned as a USAR officer on 7 November 1989, this time in the rank of captain.  He was again granted educational delays from active duty until 1993 to complete a civilian sponsored medical residency program in anesthesiology.

The applicant subsequently requested that he be allowed to fullfill his active duty obligation in the Reserve components.  The Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG) reviewed the applicant’s request and denied it on 25 July 1990.  The OTSG informed the applicant that he had entered into a contractual agreement with the Department on 25 August 1978 in which he agreed to serve no less than 3 consecutive years of active duty unless sooner relieved of the obligation or discharged by proper authorities.  It further explained that he had been granted a deferment from his active duty obligation to attend medical school and that he had signed three forms in February 1984, March 1985, and March 1986, in which he acknowledged his agreement to serve on active duty.  Furthermore, he had been granted an additional delay to complete his civilian anesthesiology training program.  Inasmuch as the Army was critically short of physicians and needed his services as an anesthesiologist, his request could not be approved.

Accordingly, the applicant was ordered to active duty on 14 August 1994 for a period of 3 years and assigned to Fort Knox, Kentucky.  He was ordered to active duty in the rank of captain and awarded 9 years of constructive credit for his active duty grade determination and 6 years creditable service for his health professional pay entry date.

On 23 November 1994 the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) amended his orders to award him 10 years and 4 months of constructive credit for his active duty grade determination and 6 years and 4 months of creditable service for his health professional pay entry date.  He was promoted to the rank of major with an adjusted date of rank of 14 April 1994.

In the processing of this case a staff member of the Board contacted officials at the local Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) office to ascertain the applicant’s BASD and BPED.  Officials at the DFAS office indicated that the applicant’s BASD was listed as 14 August 1994 and his BPED was listed as 17 December 1982, based on his constructive service credit.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  The applicant’s contention that he was unjustly denied the opportunity to serve his active duty obligation in the Reserve components is without merit.  The applicant clearly had a contract that specified his obligation to serve a minimum of 3 years of active duty unless sooner relieved of that obligation by the Department.  Furthermore, the applicant acknowledged his understanding of his active duty obligation on more than one occasion.

3.  The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he should have been commissioned in May 1980.  However, it is not supported by the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record.  The evidence of record contains an oath of office (DA Form 71) dated 17 December 1982, which is the earliest date indicating he took the oath of office. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary. it must be presumed that his commission on 17 December 1982 is valid.  

4.  The applicant’s contention that he should receive more constructive service credit than he received and that his BASD and BPED should be adjusted also appears to be without merit.  The applicant’s constructive service credit was recomputed by the ARPERCEN on 23 November 1994, and his service dates were corrected accordingly.  The applicant has submitted no evidence to refute the accuracy of either the constructive service credit or his service dates.
  
5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request. 

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                       GRANT          

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058593C070421

    Original file (2001058593C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Basic Active Service Date (BASD) and Date of Rank (DOR) be adjusted to give him credit for the time he served in the Army Reserve, both as an enlisted soldier and as an officer. It will not since constructive service only establishes the pay grade in which an officer is commissioned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004552C070206

    Original file (20050004552C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    This official stated that the applicant entered active duty on 30 June 1996 as a CPT and was credited with 6 years constructive service credit. The AHRC advisory opinion confirmed that prior to entering active duty, the applicant was given 6 years constructed service credit. By regulation, had the applicant been in an active Reserve status prior to entering active duty, his date of rank could have been backdated up to three years.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9511837C070209

    Original file (9511837C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to reflect his proper basic active service date (BASD), basic pay entry date (BPED), and the correct effective date of his promotion to the pay grade of E-4 with entitlement to all back pay and allowances. The EREC also recommended that the effective date of the applicant’s promotion to the pay grade of E-4 also should be changed to 26 September 1995. That the effective date of the applicant’s promotion to the pay grade of E-4 be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014117

    Original file (20140014117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided a memorandum from the Chief, Officer Division, Department of the Army Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, to HRC, dated 30 September 2011, which states: * the request to retain the applicant beyond his MRD was returned without action * the applicant reached his MRD on 1 August 2011 and must be transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged as soon as possible * there is no other legal authority for him to remain on the RASL 7. The evidence shows he was granted an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076730C070215

    Original file (2002076730C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show that:The applicant entered the ROTC program on 5 September 1974. The record contains no evidence that the applicant served with a Reserve unit while participating in the ROTC program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017486C070206

    Original file (20050017486C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DA Form 1506 on file in the applicant's record shows that he completed 9 years, 2 months, and 10 days of active military service on active duty between 22 May 1985 and 1 August 1994, and that he was credited with completing 115 days of active service in the USAR between 2 August 1994 and 14 July 1996, prior to entering the HPSP. The governing DODI stipulates that in the case of individuals seeking an original appointment as a health professions officer, 1/2 day of constructive credit will...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015754

    Original file (20130015754.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * ROTC contract * Sworn statement * DD Form 1870 (Request for Personnel Security Investigation) * Oath of office * Report of medical examination * Promotion orders * JAGC commission offer * Application for active duty * Appointment as Reserve commissioned officer * Active duty report * Email from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command * Excerpt from Army Regulation 601-25 (Delay in Reporting for and Exemption from Active Duty, Initial Active Duty for Training, and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050016628

    Original file (20050016628.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, the computation of the basic pay date starts on the date of the most recent entry on duty without a break in service; and USAR ROTC service in the SMP is creditable service as of 1 August 1979. Further, he should be credited with all active and inactive service he completed in the USAR between 22 January 1996 and 29 April 2004, to include the time he was in the SMP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018061C070206

    Original file (20050018061C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with this directive, paragraph 6.1.1, Prior Commissioned Service Credit, “credit for prior service as a commissioned officer (other than as a commissioned warrant officer) shall be granted to recognize previous commissioned experience....” The revised opinion recommended the applicant's request for additional CSC be denied. Those two officers received CSC for their Warrant Officer PA service. The applicant contends that he should be granted CSC for his PA Warrant Officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007505

    Original file (20060007505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he requests that his records be corrected to show his service in the SMP while serving in the United States Army Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) and the United States Army National Guard. Evidence of record shows that the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 3 September 1980 but was not assigned as an ROTC cadet in MOS 09R20 until 1 December 1980. There is no evidence that the applicant performed any active duty service during the time he was granted SMP credit.