Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507850C070209
Original file (9507850C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS:  In effect, that his bad conduct discharge (BCD), received as the result of his conviction by a special court-martial, be upgraded to one issued under honorable conditions.

APPLICANT STATES:  That his youth and immaturity impaired his ability to serve.  He adds that he has been a good citizen since his discharge.

COUNSEL CONTENDS:  NA

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He was born on 13 December 1948 and was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years on 18 June 1969; he was 20 years and 6 months old.  Upon induction, he was given aptitude tests which revealed that his Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) score of 7 which placed him in the lowest mental category, Category V.  His General Technical (GT) score [roughly equivalent to his Intelligence Quotient, or IQ, score] was a very low 55.  Deemed incapable of successfully completing Basic Combat Training (BCT), he was placed in a remedial training program from 25 June 1969 to 8 August 1969.  Following completion of this remedial program, he was enrolled in BCT at Fort Benning, Georgia, and Advanced Individual Training (AIT) at Fort McClellan, Alabama, where he was trained as a combat infantryman.  Following AIT, he was sent to Vietnam and assigned to the 1st Cavalry Division as a rifleman, reporting on 16 February 1970.

In Vietnam, the applicant was tried by a special court-martial for refusing to walk the “point” while on patrol in Cambodia; for refusing to go out with his squad on night patrol; for leaving his appointed place of duty in the field by getting aboard the resupply helicopter and returning to base camp without permission; for refusing a direct order to return to the field; for assaulting a fellow soldier on two separate occasions; for assaulting an NCO with a mortar round and a sledge hammer; and for threatening an officer and behaving with disrespect toward an officer; all of the above offenses occurring between 13-21 May 1970.  In spite of his pleas of not guilty to all charges and specifications, the applicant was convicted on all counts and sentenced to a BCD, 5 months’ confinement at hard labor, and forfeiture of $50 per month for 5 months.

The applicant was confined in the stockade at Long Binh, Vietnam.  Upon completion of his sentence to confinement, he was transferred to the Personnel Control Facility, Fort Lewis, Washington, and released on excess leave pending completion of appellate review of his conviction.  His BCD was executed on 23 January 1971.  He had 1 year, 1 month, and 20 days of creditable service and 165 days of lost time due to absence without leave and confinement.

The applicant requested a discharge upgrade from the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB).  On 11 February 1980, the ADRB denied his request.

The Military Justice Act of 1983 (Public Law 98-209), provides, in pertinent part, that military correction boards may not disturb the finality of a conviction by court-martial.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2.  The Board dismissed the applicant’s contention that he was too young and immature when he was inducted into military service, noting that he was more than 21 years old when he committed his court-martial offenses.  While the Board acknowledges the applicant’s good post-service conduct, such conduct is not sufficient to overcome the indisciplines committed while a soldier.

3.  The Board also takes note of the applicant’s low AFQT and GT scores, but believes that he still was able to distinguish right from wrong and knew that his behavior was not only inappropriate, but potentially dangerous to his fellow soldiers.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

                                GRANT          

                                GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                                DENY APPLICATION




						Karl F. Schneider
						Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012289C071029

    Original file (20060012289C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Roland Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s contentions have been noted; however, he has failed to show through evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, sufficient evidence to warrant an upgrade of his discharge. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001775C070205

    Original file (20060001775C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests, in effect, that the Board consider the applicant’s request based on the available evidence of record. However, his records do contain a duly constituted report of separation (DD Form 214), signed by the applicant, which shows that he was discharged at Fort Campbell on 16 July 1969, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 17 June 1974 and 12 August 1977, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084336C070212

    Original file (2003084336C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 23 July 1970, the applicant accepted NJP for impersonating a staff sergeant. discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072808C070403

    Original file (2002072808C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier appeal to correct his military records by upgrading his undesirable discharge to honorable; which the Board denied on 18 January 1984. The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted in the Army of the United States under "Project 100,000" on 17 April 1968 for a period of 2 years. The Board concluded that the applicant’s misconduct was inconsistent with Army standards for acceptable personal conduct and that his overall...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002490C070205

    Original file (20060002490C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that it has been well over 30 years ago, with timed served; that he was young and immature; and that he is currently 58 years old. At a general court-martial on 23 September 1971, while serving in Vietnam, the applicant pled not guilty to the charge and its specification that on or about 2130 hours, on 21 July 1971, with "intent to commit murder”, he committed an assault on another Soldier by stabbing him in the chest with a knife. When authorized, it is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014490

    Original file (20100014490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He remained absent until on or about 2 March 1970 when he returned to military control at Fort Hood, TX. On 20 November 1973, the applicant consulted with counsel and he voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. For his first period of AWOL, he was given NJP and a light punishment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076664C070215

    Original file (2002076664C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. The applicant’s contentions regarding his discharge have been noted by the Board. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508252C070209

    Original file (9508252C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    At Fort Jackson, he went AWOL again; this time from 21 July 1968 to 16 October 1968. He was tried by a general court-martial on 17 March 1971, convicted, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 10 months, forfeiture of $95 per month for 10 months, and a BCD. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015825

    Original file (20080015825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded, that all lost time due to being absent without leave (AWOL) be removed from his records and that he be present during the Board's hearing of his case. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)) provides Department of the Army policy criteria and administrative instructions regarding an applicant's request for the correction of a military record. Army Regulation 635-212, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081200C070215

    Original file (2002081200C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: