Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9507452C070209
Original file (9507452C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved
2.  The applicant requests that he be authorized separation pay for his 10 years, 2 months, and 21 days of total active service.

3.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was eligible to receive separation pay at the time he separated from the Army but was never informed of his entitlement.

4.  His military records show that he enlisted on 8 April 1981 and remained on active duty through a series of reenlistments.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 4 September 1987.

5.  On 17 December 1990, while serving as a military policeman assigned to Fort Riley, Kansas and deployed to Saudi Arabia, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for disobeying a lawful order and being disrespectful to a commissioned officer.  His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-4 and a forfeiture of pay which was suspended for a period of 2 months.  The applicant appealed his punishment but his appeal was denied.

6.  On 28 June 1991 the applicant was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-4 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, upon the expiration of his term of service.  He had served 10 years, 2 months, and 21 days of total active service  

7.  Army Regulation 601-280 serves as the authority for the Total Army Retention Program.  It outlines the procedures and criteria for immediate reenlistment of soldiers serving on active duty.  It states, in pertinent part, that a soldier serving on active duty in the pay grade of E-4 or lower will not be allowed to reenlist for a period that will exceed the maximum retention control point of 8 years and 29 days of total active service.

8.  Department of the Army Circular 635-92-1 outlines eligibility criteria for separation pay and provides separation pay formulas as authorized by the Department of Defense Instruction 1332.29 dated 20 June 1991 and other Headquarters, Department of the Army guidance, resulting from Public Law 101-510, The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1991.  The circular also illustrates the various types of separations that are either eligible or ineligible for separation pay.  It states, in pertinent part, that separation pay is authorized for soldiers serving on active duty on 5 November 1990 who were involuntarily separated prior to completion of obligated service or who were denied reenlistment/continuation.  Soldiers who are ineligible for reenlistment because they are approaching their retention control point (RCP) are not required to request extension up to the RCP are not required to request extension up to the RCP as a prerequisite for separation pay.  

CONCLUSIONS:

1.  When the applicant was reduced to the pay grade of E-4 on 17 December 1990, he was, in effect, barred from reenlistment due to exceeding the RCP for his grade. 

2.  Consequently, the applicant was honorably discharged at the expiration of his term of service on 28 June 1991 without the benefit of separation pay.  However, on 20 June 1991, the Department had announced the provisions of the implementing instructions which authorized separation pay for soldiers in the applicant’s category. 

3.  Therefore, it appears that the applicant has been unjustly denied a benefit for which he was entitled to receive.  Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to authorize the applicant full separation pay for his service.

4.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.





RECOMMENDATION:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected to reflect that the individual concerned was separated by reason of his ETS and authorized full separation pay on 28 June 1991 in the pay grade of E-4.

BOARD VOTE:  

                       GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

                       GRANT FORMAL HEARING

                       DENY APPLICATION




		                           
		        CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090709C070212

    Original file (2003090709C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that he receive separation pay and benefits for his service. While it would have been appropriate at the time to do so because the applicant would not have had to attend training, the evidence suggests that after 12+ years that have elapsed and the fact that the applicant is now 40 years of age, it would also be in the interest of justice to grant the applicant an exception to policy by not requiring him to serve in the Ready Reserve as a condition of receiving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084302C070212

    Original file (2003084302C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD Code of "JBK" is used when the authority for involuntary discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, due to "Completion of Required Active Service" for Regular Army soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment, who are separated upon completion of enlistment. It provides, in pertinent part, that full separation pay is authorized for soldiers who are fully qualified for retention but are denied reenlistment under established RCP provisions and are...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710224C070209

    Original file (9710224C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board concluded that the applicant was eligible for full separation pay at the time of his separation. The SPD code assigned the applicant should have been JCC/LCC based on the applicant’s eligibility for full separation pay and the narrative reason for separation being reduction in force.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710224

    Original file (9710224.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant states in effect, that he was separated because he was unable to reenlist based on the retention control point (RCP) for soldiers in grade E-4; that he was authorized full separation pay at the time of his separation; and that now finance indicates he was ineligible based on the SPD code contained on his DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016741

    Original file (20080016741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant specifically requests correction of his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code from “RE-1” to “RE-3” and his Separation Designator Code (SPD) from “KBK” to “JBK.” 2. On 5 February 1998, the applicant was honorably discharged in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for completion of required active service with entitlements to full involuntary separation pay. The SPD Code of "JBK" was used when the authority for involuntary discharge is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079332C070215

    Original file (2002079332C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that soldiers denied continuation on active duty under established Retention Control Point (RCP) provisions and separated at ETS are authorized full separation, pay provided the soldier has signed a Department of the Army Form 7154-R (Agreement to Join Ready Reserve) for a period of not less than 3 years. Therefore, the Board finds that he should receive full separation pay for his service and his records should be corrected to reflect a SPD Code of "JBK" and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063302C070421

    Original file (2001063302C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 18 (remarks) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect that he received “separation” pay vice “disability severance” pay. Records available to the Board indicate the applicant entered active duty on 12 June 1990 and was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 12 August 1992. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing in item 18 of the applicant’s February 2000 DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003967C070205

    Original file (20060003967C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). The SPD Code of "JBK" is used when the authority for involuntary discharge is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 4, due to "Completion of Required Active Service" for Regular Army soldiers ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment, who are separated upon completion of enlistment. Therefore, absent evidence to show that he was denied reenlistment or continuation on active duty, there appears to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020911

    Original file (20100020911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he completed 15 years and 29 days of total active service. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant was not offered early retirement under TERA because he was involuntarily separated due to reaching the RCP for a Soldier in the pay grade of E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023119

    Original file (20110023119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army. For Soldiers separating from the RA, it prescribes eligibility criteria and options for enlistment or transfer into the Reserve...