Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9006080
Original file (9006080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS: Reconsideration of his request that his honorable discharge be changed to a medical discharge with severance pay or be placed on the Temporary Disabled Retired List (TDRL).

APPLICANT STATES : That he was issued a physical profile, therefore, not being considered for a medical discharge was unjust.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which are summarized in a memorandum presented before this Board on 9 January 1991 (COPY ATTACHED).

The applicant has provided a copy of the physical profile and his DD Forms 214, dated 2 March 1970, 30 May 1978, and 17 August 1982, which were a matter of record and previously considered.

Title 38, United States Code, sections 310 and 331, permits the VA to award compensation for a medical condition which was incurred in or aggravated by active military service. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The VA, in accordance with its own policies and regulations, awards compensation solely on the basis that a medical condition exists and that said medical condition reduces or impairs the social or industrial adaptability of the individual concerned. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency.


DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

2. In the absence of medical evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the available service records are correct as presently constituted.

3. The evidence in this case does not support his contention that there was an error or injustice in his separation from active duty.

4. He was found fit for retention by a physical examination and was discharged at the expiration of his term of service.

5. The rating action by the VA does not necessarily demonstrate any error or injustice in the Army rating. The VA assigns disability ratings as it sees fit.

6. The VA can evaluate a veteran throughout his lifetime, adjusting the percentage of disability based upon that agencies examinations and findings, as has already been noted.

7. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request.

DETERMINATION: The original decision by this Board is reaffirmed.


BOARD VOTE:

GRANT

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

DENY APPLICATION




                                                      Karl F. Schneider
                                                      Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058306C070421

    Original file (2001058306C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508063C070209

    Original file (9508063C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The medical evidence of record indicates that the applicant was medically fit for retention at the time of his separation. Records provided by the VA indicate that the applicant has been awarded compensation for medical conditions which that agency has determined to be related to military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073302C070403

    Original file (2002073302C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant’s medical records do show that he injured the middle finger of his left hand in March 1970, those medical records do not indicate any medical condition incurred while entitled to receive basic pay which was so severe as to render the applicant medically unfit for retention on active duty. The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated. The medical evidence of record indicates that the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002458

    Original file (20150002458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was on active duty from 2000 to 2003 and not in the U. S. Army Reserve during that time. Those members who do not meet medical retention standards will be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB) for a determination of whether they are able to perform the duties of their grade and military specialty with the medically disqualifying condition 14. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application for reconsideration that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506101C070209

    Original file (9506101C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He notes the VA granted him a combined 50 percent disability rating for his heart condition, left ankle scar and back injury. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically unfitting for military service at the time of processing for separation, discharge or retirement, may be sufficient to qualify the individual for VA benefits based on an evaluation by that agency. The evidence of record indicates he did not have any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510722C070209

    Original file (9510722C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant himself stated that he did not desire a medical examination for separation from active duty. Six days after his release from active duty he underwent a medical examination for the purpose of enlisting in the Army National Guard and was determined to be medically fit for enlistment. The Army must find unfitness for duty at the time of separation before a member may be medically retired or separated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086420C070212

    Original file (2003086420C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Medical records, which she submits with her request, show that she was treated for right knee and thigh pain in April 1980, and in May of that year was diagnosed with chondromalacia, a softening of the articular cartilage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000718

    Original file (20090000718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that the physical evaluation board (PEB) found him fit for duty; however, because he had a permanent (P3) physical profile, he was denied reenlistment. On 8 September 2006, the VA gave the applicant a 50% disabling rating for sleep apnea to be effective 26 February 2006. Not only has the applicant failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application that he was denied reenlistment, his discharge orders indicate that he did not want...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060013560C071029

    Original file (AR20060013560C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB informed the applicant that the evidence established that his disability was not unfitting at the time of his release from active duty and there is no documentation of permanent aggravation resulting from subsequent military duty. The medical evidence of record supports the determination that the applicant's unfitting condition was properly diagnosed and rated at the time of his discharge. The available medical records show he went before an MEB and a PEB and neither...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019307

    Original file (20110019307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 December 2011, the Army Physical Disability Agency provided an advisory opinion recommending no relief. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army acting through the ABCMR. The Army must find a member physically unfit before he can be medically retired or separated.