Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9006078A
Original file (9006078A.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the Board reverse its previous action which denied his application for failure to timely apply, and consider the merits of the application.

PURPOSE : To determine if the new information and/or contentions now submitted by the applicant, when added to the information already available, contains sufficient justification to conclude that the application was filed within the time required, or if not, whether it could be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file his original application which had been denied by the Board.

NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : In support of the current request the applicant has submitted documentation which further substantiates that he is disabled from muscular dystrophy and that he had suffered from that condition from childhood.

DISCUSSION : After considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant with the current request, together with the previously available evidence of record and the applicable law and regulations, the Board again concludes that the applicant has not presented, nor do the records contain, sufficient justification to establish that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

DETERMINATION : The original determination made by the Board in this case is reaffirmed.

BOARD VOTE:

EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION




                  Karl F. Schneider
                  Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9008849

    Original file (9008849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS : That the Board reverse its previous action which denied his application for failure to timely apply, and consider the merits of the application. NEW EVIDENCE OR INFORMATION : In support of the current request, the applicant has submitted the new contention that the Giles v. Secretary of the Army (Civil Action 77-0904) applied to him. DISCUSSION : After considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant with the current request,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8908785

    Original file (8908785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PURPOSE : To determine if the new information and/or contentions now submitted by the applicant, when added to the information already available, contains sufficient justification to conclude that the application was filed within the time required, or if not, whether it could be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file his original application which had been denied by the Board. The U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), in a comment (COPY ATTACHED) to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605358C070209

    Original file (9605358C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that as a result of his being discharged, he had to apply for a new commission which resulted in the loss of additional pay and benefits that he otherwise would have retained had he been properly counseled. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: On 14 July 1977, the applicant, while serving as a medical corps officer in the rank of lieutenant colonel, was honorably released from active duty and transferred to a USAR unit in Miami, Florida. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061545C070421

    Original file (2001061545C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606953C070209

    Original file (9606953C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. On 2 October 1992, he enlisted in the Regular Army in St. Louis. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 2 October 1995.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068169C070402

    Original file (2002068169C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant's 1 November 1966 separation date is correct. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075941C070403

    Original file (2002075941C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 22 July 1970. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069856C070402

    Original file (2002069856C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056360C070420

    Original file (2001056360C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. PURPOSE : To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060833C070421

    Original file (2001060833C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely...