Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY1980-1989 | 8606664
Original file (8606664.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, reconsideration of his initial request that his medical retirement, 30 percent disabling, which was granted by this Board on 22 April 1992, be corrected to show the current VA rating.

APPLICANT STATES : That his records do not reflect the degree of disability that he is suffering with.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD : Incorporated herein by reference are military records which are summarized in a memorandum presented before this Board on 22 April 1992 (COPY ATTACHED).

On 22 April 1992, this Board vacated his honorable separation based on his perception that he could not overcome a locally imposed bar to reenlistment; relieved him from active duty for physical unfitness, 30 percent disabling; and permanently retired him.

On 5 September 1996, a VA Rating Decision awarded the applicant a service-connected disability rating of 70 percent, effective 21 October 1988, for organic brain syndrome secondary to head injury. This action increased his percentage from 30, which had been established on 31 January 1985.

DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

2. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3. The rating action by the VA does not necessarily demonstrate any error or injustice in the Army rating. The VA, operating under its own policy and regulations, assigns disability ratings as it sees fit. Any rating action by the VA does not compel the Army to modify its rating.
DETERMINATION : The original decision by this Board is reaffirmed.

BOARD VOTE :

GRANT

GRANT FORMAL HEARING

DENY APPLICATION




                                                      Karl F. Schneider
                                                      Acting Director

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9505910C070209

    Original file (9505910C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 January 1992 he was given a physical profile of 1 1 3 1 1 1 for his right ankle fracture. The PEB determined that the applicant was physically unfit to perform the duties in his rank as an infantryman and recommended that the applicant be separated from the Army with a combined disability rating of 20 percent. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020798

    Original file (20120020798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army rated the disability at 20 percent and clearly indicated it was a combat-related injury on his discharge order as well as on the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) review. f. A DA Form 199, dated 20 February 1992, that shows an informal PEB considered the applicant's case and found his condition prevented him from performing his duties and determined that he was physically unfit due to traumatic arthrosis with osteochrondritis dissecans of right ankle, injury on 6 April 1991. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019833

    Original file (20110019833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he is entitled to Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) with a 30 percent disability rating. However, the available evidence does not show that a PEB was completed or if so what the results were. _________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606443C070209

    Original file (9606443C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military and medical records show: On 16 July 1976, with prior Navy and Army Reserve service, the applicant was placed on active status in the Army Guard/Reserve (AGR) Program, as a recruiter, MOS 00E. On 6 May 1992, the applicant voluntarily requested retirement, effective 1 August 1992, based on length of service. Title 10, United States Code, section 1201, provides for the physical disability retirement of a member who has at least 20 years of service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605513C070209

    Original file (9605513C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: That he should have been medically retired, because the VA awarded him a 30 percent disability rating after he was separated from active duty. EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military and medical records show: On 26 March 1982, after having previously served for 6 months and 27 days active duty, he enlisted in the Regular Army. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014685

    Original file (20100014685.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the applicant unfit due to tendonitis, chronic of the left supraspinatus tendon, left patellar tendon, and the left Achilles tendon, rated at 10 percent disabling. Whether the decision to deny service connection for left patellar tendonitis and left shoulder bursitis was clearly and unmistakably erroneous. The available documentary evidence, provided by the applicant, shows the VA reevaluated his medical conditions in October 2000 and granted 10 percent disability ratings for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706022C070209

    Original file (9706022C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states that he was discharged for failing to meet Army weight standards by being five pounds overweight. The applicant’s medical condition was evaluated by a MEB, an informal PEB and a formal PEB all of which found him fit for duty at the time of his separation. An award of a VA rating does not establish entitlement to medical retirement or separation from the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9706022

    Original file (9706022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. He states that he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089539C070403

    Original file (2003089539C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His second option would be to have his records corrected to show that he was medically retired rather than merely discharged because of his medical conditions. The VA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affect the individual’s civilian employability. The available evidence confirms that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075977C070403

    Original file (2002075977C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that her records be corrected to show retirement because of physical disability with a 95 percent disability rating in the grade of lieutenant colonel. The applicant’s records, to include those that she herself completed and signed, dating from June 1981 to the date that she was permanently retired, show that she used her married surname even after her 1982 divorce. The evidence also suggests that she did not concur in a PEB finding to...