Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02535
Original file (PD-2014-02535.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-02535
BRANCH OF SERVICE: army         BOARD DATE: 20150120
SEPARATION DATE: 20070417


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Bradley Fighting Vehicle System Maintainer) medically separated for a lumbar spine condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty; however, his profile indicated he could take an alternate physical therapy (PT) test. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Two conditions, characterized as “lumbar degenerative disc disease” and “left L5-S1 herniated disk, status post laminotomy and discectomy complicated by postoperative infection,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB appropriately consolidated the MEB diagnoses as a single unfitting condition (“chronic low back pain” elaborating surgical residuals), rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions. My disabilities including chronic pain have made it difficult to obtain and maintain sustained employment in the civilian workforce, caused a general decline in my quality of life, and have rendered me homeless several times.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20070307
 VA – Based on Service Treatment Record (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain … 5299-5237 10% Lumbar Laminectomy ... 5237 0%* STR
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 3
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 0%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80303 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) .
* Non-compensable rating “because you failed to report to your exam and we have no current clinical findings.”
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Lumbar Spine Condition. There is an entry in the STR from August 2004 (during deployment to Iraq) documenting the onset of radiating low back pain (LBP) without known injury or precipitant, with a follow-up entry a month later in theater. The CI was diagnosed with sciatica, treated with medication, and the deployment was completed. The next entry in the available STR is an imaging report (magnetic resonance imaging) from July 2006 (9 months prior to separation) demonstrating disc disease (bi-level degenerative L3-5 and bulging L5/S1 with moderate stenosis). Follow-up chiropractic notes document continuing back pain rated 7/10 with left leg radicular pain; and, note findings of spasm, tenderness, gait disturbance, and decreased (degree not specified) range-of-motion (ROM). An orthopedic consult resulted in surgery on 21 September 2006 (L5/S1 laminectomy); which was complicated by a wound infection requiring surgical debridement and irrigation the following month (6 months prior to separation). There are scant STR entries post-operatively, although it is documented that the CI underwent PT and rehabilitation; and, there is no evidence of further complications or any incapacitating episodes. Formal ROM measurements for the MEB were conducted by PT on 9 February 2007 (2 months prior to separation), and recorded pain-limited flexion of 55 degrees (normal 90 degrees) and combined ROM of 185 degrees (normal 240 degrees).

The narrative summary was conducted soon afterwards on 22 February 2007, and, documented, “Since the patient's surgery, the patient continues to have constant low back pain, which is dull in nature. He states his symptoms have improved and he has had improvement in his leg pain also. He states his symptoms are aggravated by bending and standing, and lifting, and sitting.” The physical exam recorded normal gait and spinal contour, positive spasm and tenderness, and normal neurological findings (5/5 motor strength). As noted above, there is no temporally probative VA or other post-separation evidence.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB’s 10% rating under code 5237 (lumbosacral strain) was supported by the USAPDA pain policy, but was not consistent with VASRD §4.71a criteria for the PT ROM measurements. The latter is the only formal ROM evidence before the Board in this case; and, the flexion of 55 degrees is a §4.71a criterion for a 20% rating. The Board considered whether an additional rating could be recommended for the residual radiculopathy in evidence at separation. Firm Board precedence requires a functional impairment linked to fitness to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating disability in spine cases. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. There were no sensory or motor deficits in evidence at separation; thus no functional implications are apparent. With these considerations, members agreed that additional disability rating for neuropathy was not supported. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and conceding VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a 20% rating for the lumbar spine condition; proposing code 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) for its clinical compatibility.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating was operant in this case and it was adjudicated independently of that policy by this Board. In the matter of the lumbar spine condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5242, IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Degenerative Disc Disease, Surgical Residuals, Lumbar Spine 5242 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140528, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150010613 (PD201402535)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02578

    Original file (PD-2014-02578.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Although the narrative summary (NARSUM) dates the onset of both the cervical and lumbar complaints to a fall in July 2006, the service treatment record (STR) contains an entry from May 2006 with a complaint of “mild...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01755

    Original file (PD-2014-01755.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “degenerative arthritis, lumbar spine with myofascial component”as unfitting, rated 20%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Various STR entries...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01000

    Original file (PD-2014-01000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.In addition, the Secretary of Defense Mental Health Review Terms of Reference directed a comprehensive review of Service members with certain mental health (MH) conditions referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 that were changed or eliminated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02579

    Original file (PD-2014-02579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01837

    Original file (PD-2013-01837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20040610VA -(STR) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain without Neurologic Abnormality5299-523710%Degenerative Disc Disease of the Lumbar Spine at L5 (claimed as chronic low back pain)524210%STROther x 0Other x 1 Rating: 10%Combined Rating: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20041026 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02065

    Original file (PD-2014-02065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The MEB physical exam performed 7 months prior to separation noted tender posterior cervical muscles, pain limited range-of-motion (ROM) and normal strength both upper extremities. The CI’s low back pain (LBP) began...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00361

    Original file (PD2012-00361.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20091129 NAME: CASE NUMBER: PD1200361 BOARD DATE: 20121129 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty, SGT/E-5, 6467/Consolidated Automatic Support System (CASS) Technician (2yrs) – previously 3531/Motor Vehicle Operator (5yrs), medically separated for a low back condition. The contended conditions...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01997

    Original file (PD-2013-01997.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Active ROM “was hands to her toes, and up with slight knee flexion; good lateral bending, rotation, and extension without pain.” Neurologic examination was unremarkable. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00196

    Original file (PD2013 00196.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His first complaint of back pain in the (Army) Service treatment records (STRs) was 2 months after enlistment. The VA physical exam noted “normal posture and gait and normal curvature of the spine,” although there was a subsequent comment on scoliosis; and “no objective evidence of spasms, weakness or tenderness.” The VA ROM measurements were flexion to 80 degrees and a combined ROM of 230 degrees. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02991

    Original file (PD-2014-02991.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...