Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02426
Original file (PD-2014-02426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-02426
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150116
SEPARATION DATE: 20070327


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Fire Support Specialist) medically separated for left knee pain. The left knee pain could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “chronic left knee pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left knee pain status post debridement of pathologic plica and revision plica resection” as unfitting, rated 10%, c iting the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20070205
 VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Left Knee Pain 5099-5003 10% Residuals of Left Knee Injury 5260 0% STR
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 4
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 0%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80225 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )





ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Knee Pain. In October 2005, this CI injured his left knee while doing land navigation. He jumped over a ditch, and his foot landed in a hole. He had arthroscopic surgery on his left knee twice. However, the knee pain persisted and MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary was dictated on 9 November 2006. The CI reported that he was unable to climb stairs or ladders. Physical examination of the left knee revealed tenderness to palpation in the medial joint space region, and the medial femoral condyle. There was no patellar grind or patellar apprehension. There was no varus/valgus laxity, or cruciate ligament instability. McMurray’s sign was negative. The left leg was neurovascularly intact, and gait was minimally antalgic. Left knee range-of-motion was 0-120 degrees. The examiner’s diagnosis was: chronic left knee pain. The CI was medically separated from service in March 2007. He was scheduled for a VA Compensation and Pension exam, but he failed to appear for that evaluation. The VA assigned an initial rating of 0% for the left knee, based on evidence in the service treatment record (STR).

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Board determined that the left knee condition was essentially non-compensable based on the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a codes for loss of knee motion (5260 and 5261). However; IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, when part of the musculoskeletal system becomes painful on use, it must be regarded as seriously disabled. A 10% rating is warranted when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major joint. There was no path to a higher rating for the left knee since there was insufficient evidence of a significantly disabling knee abnormality that would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% was appropriate. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic unfitting left knee pain.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As noted above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by this Board. In the matter of the left knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140511, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150010605 (PD201402426)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00481

    Original file (PD-2014-00481.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board then considered whether there was sufficient evidence to support a 10% rating for functional loss (§4.40, §4.45).The MEB examination in January 2006 recorded a history of left knee pain “sometimes,” and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02716

    Original file (PD-2014-02716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain ...5099-500310%Right Knee PFS526010%20080128Left Knee PFS526010%20080128Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 4...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01635

    Original file (PD-2013-01635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Physical examination of the left knee revealed full range-of-motion (ROM), with marked patellar compression pain and the knee was ligamentous stablewith no meniscal pathology.The CI was separated from service on 8 April 2004 and his VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed 6 months later in October 2004. There was no path to a higher rating for the left knee since there was no evidence of joint instability, subluxation, or other significant knee abnormality.After due...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01172

    Original file (PD-2012-01172.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20030521VA* – based on Service Treatment Record(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Retropatellar Pain Syndrome, Left Knee5299-5261NSCSTROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 0%RATING: No Rating *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20040405(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Left kneepain . Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00563

    Original file (PD-2014-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain5299-523710%Chronic Low Back Strain523710%20050706Left knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals L/Knee Lateral Meniscus Repair, Chondromalacia Patella5259-501410%20050706Other x 0 (In Scope)Other x 1 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050811 ( most proximate to date of separation) Low Back Pain Condition . The CI complained of dull constant pain in the left joint line and pain behind the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01921

    Original file (PD-2012-01921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded history of cellulitis, left knee, chronic bilateral hip pain secondary to bilateral iliotibial band friction syndrome, chronic mechanical low back pain, mild (less than a centimeter) left shorter than right limb length discrepancy, and mild bilateral pes planus conditions.The PEBadjudicated “left patellofemoral pain with secondary chronic left knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01877

    Original file (PD-2014-01877.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . In the matter of the bilateral knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends that each joint be separately adjudicated as follows: an unfitting right knee pain condition coded...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02362

    Original file (PD-2014-02362.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The “right wrist injury with continued pain”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02551

    Original file (PD-2013-02551.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20050201VA –(1 Day Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome Left Knee5099-501410%20050317Patellofemoral Syndrome Right Knee5099-501410%20050317Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 2 Combined: 0%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050520 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). VA exam also documented crepitus (which is specified in §4.59) as well...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00639

    Original file (PD2012-00639.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20030627 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200639 BOARD DATE: 20130206 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SFC/E-7 (96B4H/Intelligence Analyst), medically separated for bilateral knee pain with history left knee lateral release and findings of Grade III chondromalacia of left patellofemoral...