Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02419
Original file (PD-2014-02419.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD - 2014 - 0 2419
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0224
Separation Date: 20040621


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Automated Tactical Data System Specialist) medically separated for lumbar spine with lower left leg numbness. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “left lower extremity numbness” and “low back pain (LBP)” conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (farsightedness and poor heat tolerance) as medically acceptable for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “low back pain…numbness in left leg” as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “All Conditions”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20040430
 VA* - (~2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
LBP…Numbness in Left Leg 5237 0% Lumbosacral Strain 5237 10% 20040826
Poor Heat Tolerance Not Unfitting Residual Heat Stroke 7999-7900 NSC 20040826
Farsightedness Not Unfitting No VA Placement
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 2
RATING: 0%
 RATING: 10%
*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050110 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS))

ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

 LBP…Numbness in Left Leg Condition . The CI developed back pain while carrying a rucksack during Basic Training in June 2002. He was followed by p hysical therapy (PT) for evaluation and treatment. The CI presented to the emergency room ( ER ) for left leg numbness. The p odiatrist documented that the CI reported left foot numbness for 2 weeks after he tripped on a rock and fell with pain in the lower back. There were physical exam findings of mild pain left ankle and loss of sensation on the left foot with normal strength. The examiner referred the CI to n eurology and opined that the left foot numbness was most likely due to his lower back. The p odiatrist noted an improvement in the left foot paresthesias and neuropathy. The n eurologist documented mid - lumbar spine tenderness back pain with forward flexion . S ensory exam showed decreased pin prick in left knee, leg and foot; total loss of position sense in left big toes and total loss of vibration in left foot to knee. An electromyogram performed on 11 September 2003 demonstrated a normal exam . T here was no evidence of left L3-S1 radiculopathy/plexopathy or generalized sensory motor polyneuropathy. The examiner started the CI on medication (Neurontin) for neuropathic pain. A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a mild diffuse L4-5 disc bulge without clear evidence of nerve root impingement. The n eurologist documented that there were no significant objective findings to indicate radiculopathy, nor was there any focal weakness or asymmetrical reflexes . The examiner further opined that most , if not all , of the findings were psychological. The CI was referred back to PT and followed throughout in 2004. The PT exam approximately 4 months prior to separation completed range - of - motion (ROM) evaluations for the MEB examiner. The PT physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam , approximately 4 months prior to separation , documented difficulty with walking and running . It also noted a profile that prevented him from running, taking the PT test or wear ing a backpack . The CI was allowed to walk at his own pace. The n eurologist noted that the CI was able to walk on his heels and do a tandem gait with eyes open and closed without difficulty. H owever , the sensory exam showed sens ation was totally lost in the left lower extremity up to the mid-thigh , which did not follow any real physiological distribution.

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 2 months after separation documented that the CI reported a sense of numbness to the left upper thigh and gluteal area and residual pain only in the low back and left sacral area , which was exacerbated by bending and lifting. The CI also reported that he had no perception of his left foot in terms of position or location , or in terms of what he might be walking on.

As mentioned above, t here were multiple ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation as summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees)
PT/NARSUM 4 Mos. Pre-Sep
PT ~2 Mos. Pre Sep
VA ~2 Mos. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 30 80 NO ROMs
Combined (240) 150 230 -
Comment Inclinometer used & l umbar (not thoracolumbar) R OM ; Pos. tenderness to palpation; Normal strength & reflexes; Decreased sensory function left leg Goniometer used for thoracolumbar ROM testing ; No painful motion; No Waddell ’s signs Normal gait; Pos. tenderness without muscle spasm; Neg. SLR ; Normal strength & reflexes; Decreased sensory function left leg
§4.71a Rating N/A (PEB 0%) 10% 10% (VA 10%)
invalid font number 31502
The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the LBP… numbness in left l eg condition as 5237 ( l umbosacral or cervical strain ) rated at 0%. The VA coded the l umbosacral s train condition as 5237 rated at 10% citing “Based on the DeLuca criteria, we are granting you an additional 10 percent for your limited range of motion due to pain.” The Board could not find any C&P exam ROM measurements for the thoracolumbar spine in the evidence present for review. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease . ” The ROM measurements referred to in the NARSUM were obtained by a PT who used an inclinometer to obtain “ l umbar” spine measurements , thus not meeting VASRD §4.46, for a ccurate measurement. The Board agreed that the comprehensive PT exam performed approximately 2 months prior to separation w as closer to separation and contained the required data for basing its rating recommendation and thus was assigned exclusive probative value. The CI met the 10% rating criteria for “ f orward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 60 degrees but not greater than 85 degrees” and “combined range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees . ” Board precedent is that a functional impairment tied to fitness is required to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case has no functional implications. The re was no motor impairment that could be linked to any physical impairment. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence , and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10 % for the LBP… n umbness in l eft l eg condition without the additional coding of a neuropathy condition .

 Contended PEB Conditions. The contended conditions adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB were f arsightedness and poor heat i ntolerance . The Board’s first charge with respect to these conditions is an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudications. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. None of these conditions were profiled; the CI was only profiled for the LBP with left leg numbness and weakness. N one of the contended conditions were implicated in the commander’s statement ; and, none were judged to fail retention standards. All were reviewed and considered by the Board. There was no indication from the record that any of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation , and in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the f arsightedness and p oor h eat i ntolerance conditions and therefore, no additional disability ratings can be recommended.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the l ow b ack p ain … n umbness in l eft l eg condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10 %, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended f arsightedness and p oor h eat i ntolerance conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


invalid font number 31502


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
L ow B ack P ain …Numbness in Left Leg 5237 1 0%
RATING 1 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 140516 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150010602 (PD201402419)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




 Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                            (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

    Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00698

    Original file (PD2013 00698.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ; No muscle spasm invalid font number 31502 Also noted in evidence was a VA PT exam dated 13 months after separation that documented “Trunk ROM is limited 50% flexion, lateral flexion left and 25% rotation left. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD, scoliosis and strain condition as 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine, rated at 20% based on a forward flexion of 40 degrees.The general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “With or without...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01569

    Original file (PD-2013-01569.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20041103VA – 88 Months Post-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Radiating LBP 52420%Chronic LBP5237NSC20120529Left Toe...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00715

    Original file (PD 2014 00715.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain with Radiculopathy523710%Mild Central Bulge L3-4524310%20040315Other x6 (Not in Scope)Other x7 (Not in Scope)20040315 Combined: 10%Combined: 40%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040518 (most proximate to date of separation) invalid font number 31502 ANALYSIS SUMMARY : LBP with Radiculopathy Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI's...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00037

    Original file (PD-2014-00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The VA exam was closest to the date of separation and documented worsened pain-limited ROM than the MEB exam. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01210

    Original file (PD 2014 01210.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20050119VA - (1Mo. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00213

    Original file (PD-2014-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP523710%Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Syndrome524310%20070227S1 Radiculopathy Left Lower Extremity5243-852010%20070227Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating...