Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02088
Original file (PD-2014-02088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2014-02088
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150121
SEPARATION DATE: 20060403


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Food Services Operation) medically separated for right foot pain. The right foot condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Chronic right foot pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “right foot pain” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20060307
 VA – (~6 mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Foot Pain 5284 10% Residuals, Fracture of Right Fifth Toe 5284 10% 20060921
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 20060921
Rating: 10%
 Combined Rating: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20061107 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Foot Pain. In October 2003, the CI was injured when a mobile kitchen trailer rolled over his right foot. He suffered a fracture of the proximal phalanx of his right 5th toe. He was put into a short leg walking cast for 3 weeks. When the cast came off, he used a cam walker boot for 11 weeks. The CI was seen for follow-up on 25 May 2004. His chief complaint at that time was pain in the right fourth toe. He was given a steroid injection, which provided relief of pain. He presented for care again on 14 June 2004, complaining of continued pain in the right foot with walking and running. He was offered exploratory surgery, but he declined. Due to the chronic, persistent nature of the right foot pain, a MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary was dated on 5 December 2005. Physical exam (PE) at that time was non-contributory. The examiner’s diagnosis was: “chronic right foot pain.” The CI was medically separated from service on 3 April 2006. On 21 September 2006, 24 weeks later, the CI had a VA Compensation and Pension exam. He reported that some days he could walk for long distances, but other days it was difficult to walk a city block. There was no pain at the site of the previous fracture, but he complained of pain with pressure just above the right third and fourth toes. On PE, both feet were normal in appearance. Gait was normal and there were no limitations with standing or walking. He was able to rise on his toes and heels. There was no pain with motion of the right foot. There was no edema (swelling), instability, or weakness. The dorsum (sole) of the right foot was tender to pressure between the 3rd and 4th toes.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and the VA both chose diagnostic code 5284 (Foot injuries, other) for the right foot condition, and both assigned a disability rating of 10%. After careful review of all available evidence, the Board determined that, at the time of separation, the CI’s right foot condition was best described as “moderate.” There was insufficient evidence in the record to justify a classification of “moderately severe” or “severe.” The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating, using other VASRD codes for the right foot condition. However, there was insufficient evidence of a significantly disabling foot abnormality that would justify a higher rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board found insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic right foot condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right foot pain and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140429, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150010470 (PD201402088)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01747

    Original file (PD-2014-01747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Chronic Pain, Left Foot Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02704

    Original file (PD-2013-02704.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Stress Fractures, Both Heels5099-500310%Residuals, Stress Fracture, Left Heel528410%20061108Residuals, Stress Fracture, Right Heel528410%20061108No Additional MEB/PEB EntriesOther x 1 Rating: 10%Combined Rating: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20070129 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.59...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02791

    Original file (PD-2013-02791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separationand, to review those fitness determinations within its scope consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. tenderness to palpation; Decreased movement of toes of right foot; Repetitive motion increased ROM; No temperature change; No skin or vascular changes; Normal reflexes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02373

    Original file (PD-2014-02373.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic bilateral foot pain secondary to stress reactions in both feet…)”as a condition existing prior to service but was permanently service aggravated and rated at 0%,with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions weredetermined to be not unfitting therefore not ratable.The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. The 5022 code...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01921

    Original file (PD-2014-01921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02368

    Original file (PD-2013-02368.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    tenderness both heels; Normal gait§4.71a Rating10%10%10% (PEB 0%)10% (PEB 0%)10%10% invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic bilateral foot pain condition as 5099 analogous to 5022 (periostitis), rated at 0%. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02429

    Original file (PD-2013-02429.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Bilateral Sesamoiditis and Back Pain5099-500310%Bilateral Foot Condition5299-52780%20050113Back Condition5299-5237NSC20050105Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 2 Rating: 10%Rating: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01976

    Original file (PD-2014-01976.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. A permanent L3 physical profile dated 11 June 2007 was issued for the “Healed R foot stress fracture.” He “had stress changes of the R foot 3 rd & 4 th Metatarsals noted on 7March 2007. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01412

    Original file (PD-2013-01412.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Foot Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the right foot condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00562

    Original file (PD-2012-00562.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20020402 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200562 BOARD DATE: 20121220 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E‐4 (95B10/Military Police), medically separated for a right foot condition following injury to the sesamoid bone of the great toe (hallux). Any conditions or contention not...