Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01961
Original file (PD-2014-01961.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2014-01961
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150115
SEPARATION DATE: 20060623


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic) medically separated for back pain. This condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty although he was authorized to perform alternate physical fitness testing. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic lower back pain”, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain…” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please review all medical conditions.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20060522
 VA* - (~6 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain… 5299-5237 10% Lumbar Spine DDD 5242 0% 20061208
Other x 0
 Other x 3
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70322 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Back Pain. The CI’s history of low back pain (LBP) began in January 2005 after he reportedly injured his back while playing basketball during physical training. Radiographs of the lumbar spine, January 2005, noted mild scoliosis. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine dated 25 June 2005 demonstrated posterior disk bulging at the lumbosacral junction with mild disk degeneration (L5-S1), and mild degenerative facet disease. There was minimal diffuse spondylosis and no evidence of disk herniation. The CI underwent treatment that included physical therapy exercises, chiropractic care, aquatic therapy, pain medications, and a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation unit (electrical nerve stimulation). He had consultation and treatment with physical medicine and was provided injections to relieve his pain. Treatment was of limited benefit; he continued to have pain. The CI did not experience any incapacitating episodes; however, having failed conservative treatment he was placed on a permanent profile. At the MEB/narrative summary exam dated 20 March 2006, approximately 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported he initially experienced persistent back pain for over six months but most recently his pain had become intermittent. He described his pain as throbbing in nature with occasional symptoms down his left lower extremity. His pain worsened with prolonged sitting, running, jumping, wearing and carrying military gear, and with bending or twisting activities. Alleviating factors were not recorded. The MEB physical exam noted tenderness to palpation over the lumbar paraspinal musculature on the left and noted muscle strength testing was limited by pain, and that the CI reported decreased sensation to light touch along the bottom of the left foot. The examiner deferred to the range-of-motion (ROM) testing performed by physical therapy dated 28 February 2006, approximately 4 months prior to separation, noted thoracolumbar flexion on three attempts averaged 47 degrees. Extension was recorded at 15 degrees.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) dated 8 December 2006, approximately 6 months after separation, the CI reported he was incapacitated for 72 hours in the days following the injury (not recorded in the available evidence). He reported he had pain, stiffness and weakness in the lumbar spine that at times radiated into the left lower extremity. His baseline pain was recorded at 2/10 on the scale of 0-10. He noted his pain was responsive to bed rest, heat and cold packs, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory over the counter medication. The CI did not require an assistive device for ambulation and indicated he could walk five miles. Forward flexion ROM was recorded at 90 degrees (90 normal), and after repetitive motion the back was not additionally limited by pain, fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance or incoordination. Muscle spasm, guarding, and painful motion were absent, and his gait was normal.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition 10% for pain limiting motion with localized tenderness coded analogously 5237 (lumbosacral strain). The VA rated 0% coded 5242. The PEB opined the ROM flexion was limited by pain alone. A higher code of 20% requires spasms producing abnormal gait, or abnormal curvature of the spine, or forward flexion not greater than 60 degrees. The Board reviewed the record in evidence and noted there were two other recorded ROM entries in the months prior to separation, both were consistent with the last recorded ROM for the MEB. The ROM recorded on 8 November 2005, 7 months prior to separation, noted forward flexion of 55 degrees and the ROM recorded on 28 February 2006 (4 months prior to separation) with forward flexion of 48 degrees. The Board is required to evaluate ROM based on the VARSD and its directive. The VA rates limitation of motion due to pain at the point in which the examinee can no longer continue the motion. The Board also discussed the C&P’s recorded ROM that noted full forward flexion ROM, 6 months after separation. Board members acknowledged the back condition appeared to have improved significantly post separation; however, at the time of separation, the CI met the 20% rating criteria. The Board also considered code 5243 (intervertebral disc syndrome); however, this code did not support a higher rating since there was no evidence of incapacitating episodes of at least 6 weeks duration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5237 for the low back pain condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain 5237 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140418, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150010586 (PD201401961)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02651

    Original file (PD-2013-02651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic thoracolumbar back pain due to scoliosis” as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00297

    Original file (PD2012-00297.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20060126 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200297 BOARD DATE: 20121102 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a 1LT/O-2 (00E, Student Officer) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CI accepted the PEB findings, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. 2...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02797

    Original file (PD-2013-02797.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded “low back and cervical pain with evidence of cervical and lumbar disk disease…” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as not meeting retention standards IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The eye condition was reviewed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01977

    Original file (PD-2014-01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic neck pain” and “chronic low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, respectively, for a combined 10% disability, with likely reliance on AR 635-40 for rating. Disk protrusions were noted to decrease from 2005 through 2007 and the mild dilatation of the central thoracolumbar spinal canal (Syrinx) was stable.At the MEB exam, the CI reported back pain exacerbated by activity and rare left leg pain. In the matter of the back condition, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 00906

    Original file (PD2014 00906.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VARD also noted the absence of radicular findings and no recording of ROM (the CI refused testing).The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB rated the condition for ROM limited by pain, coded 5237, and assigned a rating of 0%.The VA rated the condition under code 5242, 10% for muscle spasm.Under the applicable spine rules, a rating of 10% requires cervical spine flexion of greater than 30 degrees but less than 40 degrees or a combined...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 01910

    Original file (PD2014 01910.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (high frequency hearing loss and anxiety disorder) for PEB adjudication.The Informal PEBadjudicated left shoulder pain, neck pain and LBPas unfitting, rated 10%, 0% and 0% respectively, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) for the neck and back condition and citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for the shoulder condition. The PEB rated the condition of chronic neck...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02147

    Original file (PD-2014-02147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The range-of-motion (ROM) and neurological examination were normal. The radiculopathy condition was reviewed and considered by the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02204

    Original file (PD-2013-02204.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At the MEB physical examination dated 8 May 2006, the examiner recorded the CI’s history of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar pain since 2002with tingling and numbness of both legs and feet intermittently and noted no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01838

    Original file (PD2012 01838.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The CI had additional spine surgery in 2006 and subsequent left lower extremity peripheral nerve rating in 2008 and additional spine surgery in 2009. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02326

    Original file (PD-2014-02326.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Formal MEB PT goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) testing of the thoracolumbar spine was performed on 15 December 2006 (approximately 5 months prior to separation) and documented forward flexion of 20 degrees (normal 90) and combined ROM of 120 degrees (normal 240). The PEB disability description indicated the rating was based on tenderness and ROM limited by pain, but did not specify ROM values or detail which ROM exam was used for rating. Additionally, the CI had continuing and recurring...