Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01740
Original file (PD-2014-01740.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2014-01740
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141022
SEPARATION DATE: 20070727


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC /E- 4 ( 91W10 / Health Care Specialist ) medically separated for right shoulder arthritis . The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U 3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The shoulder condition characterized as “ p ost - traumatic degenerative arthritis of the right glenohumeral joint ” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 . No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The I nformal PEB adjudicated “post - traumatic arthritis right (dominant) shoulder with recurrent symptoms following arthroscopy for frayed anterior labrum and osteochondral deficit” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Two weeks after the initial PEB, the CI submitted a rebuttal. After review, the PEB found the rebuttal contained no new objective medical or performance evidence which would warrant a change to the original findings of 0% impairment. The CI was then medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: “PLEASE CONSIDER ALL CONDTIONS” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting right shoulder condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Corrections of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20070524
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Posttraumatic Arthritis Right (Dominant) Shoulder with Recurrent Symptoms following Arthroscopy for Frayed Anterior Labrum and Osteochondral Deficit 5010 0% S/p Right Subacromial Decompression with Scar Claimed as Right Shoulder Arthritis 5297-5010 10% 20070913
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 3
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20080513 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).






ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Right Shoulder Condition. More than one mechanism of injury is documented in early service treatment record (STR) entries, but it would appear that right shoulder pain surfaced in January 2006 after feeling a “pop” while lifting weights. The shoulder pain persisted despite extensive conservative measures to include medication, physical therapy (PT), injections and rest. Radiology testing revealed arthritis, tendonitis and a cartilaginous cyst within the right shoulder joint. The CI was referred to orthopedics and subsequently underwent an arthroscopy with debridement of the right shoulder on 3 May 2006. Improved range-of-motion (ROM) was documented in STR entries over his post-operative course; although pain with various (MOS critical) activities persisted; and, a MEB was initiated. No STR entries documented instability, subluxation or any positive neurovascular findings. He was permanently profiled in February 2007 with a diagnosis of right shoulder pain. At the narrative summary dated 3 April 2007 (4 months prior to separation and 11 months after surgery) the CI endorsed right shoulder pain “whenever he moves his arm away from his body.” The physical examination revealed limited and painful motion of the right shoulder. There was no comment with regards to instability or impingement signs. The pain rating was described as “constant” in frequency and “moderate” in intensity.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination dated 13 September 2007 (7 weeks after separation) the CI reported a daily, intermittent, sharp, 7 of 10 pain in the right shoulder made worse with activities and relieved with rest and ice. He denied “weakness, heat, redness, give way, lack of endurance, locking, fatigability, and or dislocation.” The examination revealed painful motion. Repetitive use increased pain, but without additional limitation in ROM. There was no comment with regards to the presence of spasms or abnormal neurovascular findings. The examiner noted, “The [CI] reports no limitation due to this condition.” The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Shoulder ROM
(Degrees)		 MEB ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20070403)
PT ~ 2.5 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20070 515 )
 VA C&P ~2 Mo. Post-Sep
(20070913)
Flexion (180 Normal) 70 85 180
Abduction (180) 75 65 180
Comments       painful motion   painful motion painful motion
§4.71a Rating 30% 30% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Both the PEB and the VA cited painful limitation of motion and rated the right shoulder under the primary code of 5010 (post-traumatic arthritis) at 0% and 10% respectively. Board members first acknowledged that the VA’s analogous prefix of 5297 (removal of ribs) was an error in documentation and that the primary code of 5010 alone was appropriate. The Board next agreed that the persistence of painful motion on both the PEB and VA exams was easily supported under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.59 to achieve the minimal compensable 10% rating. The Board next considered the vast differences in the ROM during the 5 months depicted in the above charts and could not account for the dramatic improvement as revealed at the C&P exam and therefore, probative value was discussed acknowledging the significant impact on the Board’s final rating recommendation. The Board carefully reviewed the file for other corroborating evidence. After extensive deliberation, Board members agreed that both the MEB and PT examinations, although consistent, were extremely cursory in depth by simply measuring ROM; whereas, the VA examination was very detailed to include documentation on the absence of edema, effusion, weakness, tenderness, redness, heat, subluxation or guarding of shoulder movement. Additionally, the exam noted normal neurologic findings to the upper extremities. Members agreed to assign the greatest probative value to the VA examination based upon the above findings.
There was no ROM impairment of the most probative exam to achieve a compensable rating under code 5201 (limitation of motion) and painful motion was present to support the 10% rating under 5010. There was no clinical evidence of ankylosis or nonunion/malunion of any component of the shoulder girdle; and, no history of recurrent shoulder dislocation; thus, no shoulder joint code under VASRD §4.71a would yield a rating greater than 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a Service disability rating of 10% for the right shoulder condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy DoDI 1332.39 for rating the right shoulder was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% coded 5010 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Shoulder; Posttraumatic Arthritis 5010 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140418, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review







 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150008233 (PD201401740)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01106

    Original file (PD2013 01106.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the right-shoulder condition as unfitting rated at 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD);the bilateral knee, right-ankle and lumbar diagnoseswere consolidated as a single unfitting condition coded analogously to 5003 (degenerative arthritis)rated at 10%, with likely application ofthe U.S. Army Physical Disability Agencypain policy and/or AR 635-40 (B.24.f). There are multiple STR entries reflecting normal or nearly normal...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01730

    Original file (PD-2012-01730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left shoulder condition, characterized as “Chronic left shoulder pain,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40- 501. The PEB adjudicated the “Chronic pain, left shoulder, rated as slight/constant” condition as unfitting and rated it 10% IAW the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00180

    Original file (PD-2014-00180.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Shoulder Condition . The PEB adjudicated the left shoulder at 0% coded 5099-5003, citing degenerative arthritis with loss of joint motion due to pain alone.The VA originally rated the left shoulder at 0%,coded 5201-5010 (arm; limitation of motion-traumatic arthritis) with an increase to 10% subsequent to C&P summary examinations citing painful motion.The left shoulder limited ROM of 90 degrees supports a20%minimum rating with application of code 5201.After due deliberation, considering...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01687

    Original file (PD2012 01687.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated the chronic pain of right shoulder status-post arthroscopic surgery condition as unfitting, rated 0% (referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency pain policy), and adjudicated the chronic back pain due to scoliosis condition as existed prior to service (EPTS). At the C&P exam of 9 December 2004, 2 months after separation, the history indicated the CI “had referred low back pain and scoliosis since she was in high...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00729

    Original file (PD2012-00729.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20021204 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200729 BOARD DATE: 20130115 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E‐3 (11B10/Infantry), medically separated for chronic right knee pain. Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01018

    Original file (PD2012 01018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SUMMARY OF CASE :Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (11B10/Infantryman) medically separated for post-traumatic degenerative arthritis of the right elbow, which existed prior to service (EPTS), but was permanently service aggravated (PSA) during Operation Anaconda. The CI reported pain and locking in the elbow that interfered with push-ups, certain activities required by his MOS and the elbow would lock...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00873

    Original file (PD2012-00873.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the left shoulder impingement syndrome condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and cited application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Therefore, the case is referred to the Physical Evaluation Board for disposition.” The left elbow condition was profiled along with the left shoulder which listed the profiled medical condition as “left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01906

    Original file (PD2012 01906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A third and final MEB in October 2002 forwarded the bilateral knee condition, characterized as bilateral patellofemoral syndrome, status post(s/p) left patellar tendon to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) IAW 1850.4E.The MEB also identified and forwarded left shoulder superior labral tear, s/p arthroscopic repair and left hip greater trochanteric bursitis for IPEB adjudication. The IPEB adjudicated bilateral patellofemoral syndrome (PFS) as unfitting, rated 10%, with application...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01108

    Original file (PD-2013-01108.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    CI CONTENTION : “The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) medically separate [ sic ] me with a 10% rating and I contend that it should have been more than what the medical board granted! The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01199

    Original file (PD-2013-01199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “right shoulder instability status post two shoulder surgeries”as unfitting, rated 10%.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Physical Disability Board of Review DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRSSubj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONSRef: (a) DoDI 6040.44