Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00182
Original file (PD-2014-00182.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD - 20 14 - 00 182
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0211
Separation Date: 200 5 0625


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a drilling National Guard E-6 (Field Artillery) medically separated for a knee and neck condition. The knee and neck conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3/L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The knee and neck conditions, characterized as “right knee pain” and “chronic neck pain, existed prior to service (EPTS), but permanently aggravated by service,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions (right elbow pain and post-phlebitic syndrome). The Informal PEB adjudicated “right knee pain” and “chronic neck pain” as unfitting, rated 10% and “---%” respectively, citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for the knee and the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) for the neck. Additionally, the PEB identified the neck condition as EPTS and not permanently aggravated beyond natural progression by such service. The PEB further adjudicated the right elbow pain and post-phlebitic syndrome conditions as not unfitting. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI writes: “injury to the right knee, right elbow. The right knee has been operated on twice to correct the injury with no relief, the condition has worsened.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.







RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20070330
 VA - (6 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 10% Degenerative Osteoarthritis, Right Knee 5010 10% 20061120
Chronic Neck Pain 5299-5242 ---% Neck Condition 5237 Not Service Connected
Right Elbow Pain Not Unfitting Olecranon Spur, Right Elbow 5015 10%
Other x 1 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 20061120
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070130 prior to his date of separation [DOS], with an effective date of 20060424 when the CI filed and 20061002 for the R Elbow and the 40%

ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Right Knee Pain Condition . The CI inju r ed his right knee in June 2005 when he was doing three to five rushes in a gravel area, fell and caught his knee on the gravel. A right knee X -ray was normal. The civilian Orthopedist documented popping, catching and locking of the right knee. There were physical exam findings of positive medial joint line tenderness, positive Mc Murrays sign, and pain with maximum flexion. The examiner diagnosed right medial meniscal tear. The CI underwent a right knee arthroscopy and partial medial meniscectomy on 8 December 2005. The CI had chronic post-operative pain and he underwent a cortisone injection on 9 January 2006 , which provided only one day of pain relief. The p hysical t herapist (PT) noted that the CI continued to have pain in the medial aspect of the knee that felt just like it did prior to surgery. There physical exam findings of range - of - motion (ROM) for flexion limited to 0 -125 degrees (normal 140). The PT performed ROM’s for the MEB narrative summary ( NARSUM ) exam that is summarized in the chart below. The right knee X -ray noted mild medial femorotibial subluxation, minimal degenerative changes and a small ossification at the soft medial tissue. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6 months prior to separation documented chronic right knee pain rated at 5-6/10 with pain flares rated at 8-9/10 at least 3-4 times a week lasting for several hours. He reported that he had problems at his civilian job performing defensive tactics while grappling with inmates as a correctional officer. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. The MEB NARSUM exam approximately 3 months prior to separation documented chronic right knee pain, locking and occasional morning swelling. The knee symptoms were aggravated by going upstairs, prolonged standing, prolonged sitting and trying to do any running. The examiner further noted that he CI would wear a brace as needed. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

Right Knee ROM (Degrees) PT ~ 8. 5 Mo. Pre Sep VA C&P ~ 6 Mo. Pre-Sep MEB ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep
Flexion (140 Normal) 123 115 123
Extension (0 Normal) -3 0 - 3
Comment No painful motion; No instability or crepitus Pos. painful motion & antalgic gait ; No instability Pos. painful motion; No instability
§4.71a Rating 0% 10% * (VA 10%) 10% * (PEB 10%)
invalid font number 31502 * IAW VASRD §4.59 invalid font number 31502

The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the right knee pain condition as 5099-5003 ( Arthritis ) , degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis ) and rated at 10% with application of the USAPDA pain policy . The VA coded the degenerative osteoarthritis, right knee as 5010 ( Arthritis ) , due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings and rated at 10%. VASRD §4.71a specifies for 5003 that “satisfactory evidence of painful motion” constitutes limitation of motion and specifies application of a 10% rating “for each such major joint or group of minor joints affected by limitation of motion” and VASRD §4.59 ( Painful motion ) provides an alternate justification for a 10% rating. There was no evidence of instability or any other right knee condition that could be rated higher than 10% using any reasonable alternate rating schema. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right knee pain condition.

 Chronic Neck Pain Condition : The CI injured his neck during hurricane Ivan in September 2004 from lifting heavy bags. At that time, he was a member of a State National Guard unit. T he CI felt pain and radicular symptoms that radiated into his left upper extremity. He underwent conservative treatment with Physical Therapy , non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and activity limiting profiles. The CI continued with worsening cramps of the arms with tingling at the back of the arm, exacerbated by heavy lifting with storm recovery . An electromyogram demonstrated evidence of a C5-C6 left nerve root lesion - cervical radiculopathy. A cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging showed a posterior disc protrusion C5-6, multi-level neural foraminal narrowing. A civilian n eurologist documented aggravated neck and left shoulder pain after having to restrain an inmate in his civilian position. There were normal physical exam findings of the neck and left upper extremity. A cervical spine X -ray showed mild spondylosis of the cervical spine form C4 through C6 with small marginal spurs and mild neural encroachment form C3-C6 bilaterally. The o ccupational t herapist ( OT) performed goniometric ROM measurements for the MEB exam which are summarized in the chart below. The CI was followed by OT for treat ment of the neck pain. The c ommander’s s tatement focused solely on the knee condition, there was no mention of a neck injury. The CI was given a permanent U3 profile for chronic back pain (cervical), however there were no restrictions specific to neck pain as h e was able to wea r his helmet. The VA C&P examiner made no mention of a neck injury condition. The MEB NARSUM exam approximately 3 months prior to separation documented that the CI conti nued to have pain rated at 8/10 aggravated by lifting and bending. The examiner opined that although the neck problem was “clearly a long standing condition ” …“ it was aggravated during his training exercise . ” The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

Cervical ROM (Degrees) PT ~ 3 Mo. Pre-Sep MEB ~3 Mo. Pre-Sep
Flex (45 Normal) 45 ROM’s used from PT exam
Combined (340) 340
Comment No painful motion Pain limited (mildly) ROM; N o tenderness
§4.71a Rating 0% 0%
invalid font number 31502
The Board direct ed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the chronic neck pain condition as 5299 analogous to 5242 ( d egenerative arthritis of the spine ) and adjudicated as EPTS without service aggravation (no rating was granted) ; however, t he MEB forwarded the condition as “service aggravated –yes . ” The VA coded the neck condition as 5237 ( Lumbosacral or cervical strain ) , and was not granted service - connection. The VA ’s decision was based on the fact that the CI had no medical treatment and there was no diagnosed neck condition while on active duty or that this condition was due to active duty service. The Board’s main charge regarding this condition is evaluation of the PEB’s EPTS determination without service ag g r a vation . The Board’s authority for recommending a change in the EPTS determination is not specified in DoDI 6040.44, but is considered adjunct to its DoD-specified obligation to review fitness adjudications. As with its consideration of fitness adjudications, the Board’s threshold for countering EPTS determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The data supports that the neck pain condition was due to an injury that occurred when the CI was not in a period of active duty service and there was no completed line of duty determination present for review. The data supports that the CI’s neck ROM measurements were completely normal with equivocal evidence for painful motion IAW VASRD §4.59 . After a thorough discussion and review of the evidence, and based on PT documentation of full ROM measurements and MEB documentation of no point tenderness, all Board members agreed that the chronic neck pain condition should be rated at 0%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 0% for the chronic neck pain condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The contended condition adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB was the right elbow pain . The Board’s fi rst charge with respect to this condition is an assessment of the appropriateness of the PEB’s fitness adjudications. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt ) standard used for its rating recommendations and requires a preponderance of evidence. Although the right elbow pain condition was profiled at entrance into the disability evaluation system, there were no addition al restrictions related to the elbow condition. The c ommander’s s tatement focused solely on the right knee condition and there was no mention of the right elbow condition interfering in the MOS duty performance. This condition was not judged to fail retention standards. The MEB examiner documented that although the CI had problems lifting because of the pain; this condition had “not interrupted his career” and did not fail retention standards. The right elbow pain condition was reviewed by the a ction o fficer and considered by the Board. There was no indication from the record that any of th is condition significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for right elbow pain contended condition and, therefore, no additional disability rating can be recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy ( 635-40) for rating the right knee pain condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right knee pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 0 %, coded 5 299-5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended right elbow pain condition , the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Knee Pain 5099-5003 1 0%
Chronic Neck Pain 5299-5242 0%
COMBINED 1 0%
invalid font number 31502








The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131229 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150011015 (PD201400182)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability description without modification of the combined rating or recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




 Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                            (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01431

    Original file (PD-2013-01431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20040225VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Subjective Back Pain with L4-5 Spondylolisthesis523910%Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) and Spondylolisthesis5239-523540%STRChronic Arthritis Right Knee5003---%Arthritis, Right Knee5010-525910%STROther x0 (Not in Scope)Other x0 (Not in Scope) Combined: 10%Combined: 50%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01533

    Original file (PD-2013-01533.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “TBI with residual neck pain and headaches;” “low back pain (LBP);” and “left knee pain with degenerative joint disease (DJD),” as unfitting, rated at 10%, 10%, and 0% respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere in the treatment record that documented any significant interference of the neck pain condition with the performance of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02693

    Original file (PD-2013-02693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Chronic Neck Pain . The commander’s statement made no mention that the sleep apnea interfered with the CI performing his MOS duties.The MEB examiner mentioned that the sleep apnea condition was controlled with use of a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01448

    Original file (PD-2013-01448.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The profile completed 11 months prior to separation only noted the cervical stenosis s/p fusion condition as duty limiting. The Board could not find evidence in the service treatment record that documented any...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186

    Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02763

    Original file (PD-2013-02763.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examinationperformed approximately 8 months prior to separation, the CI reported persistent neck pain and progressively increasing right upper extremity symptoms.The examiner noted that the neurologist opined that his functional ability was severely limited.The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. Members agreed that based on the clinical evidence and fitness performance criteria, the neck and right upper extremity...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01035

    Original file (PD 2012 01035.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    To that end, the evidence for the right knee pain and neck pain conditions are presented separately; with attendant recommendations regarding separate unfitness and separate rating if indicated. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policyfor rating the right knee pain and chronic neck pain conditions was operant in this case and the conditions were adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board.In the matter of the right knee pain condition, the Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00508

    Original file (PD 2012 00508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Neck Pain Condition: The PEB determined this condition was unfitting but was also EPTS and not aggravated by service. Both prior service and service disability ratings are determined IAW the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard and the final disability percent rating is determined by deducting the prior service rating from the service rating. The C&P examination used to determine the 30% disability rating was based on an exam completed more than a year prior to separation and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01622

    Original file (PD2012 01622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back, neck and bilateral foot pain conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. In the matter of the bilateral foot pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...