Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00005
Original file (PD-2014-00005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-00005
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY         BOARD DATE: 20150716
SEPARATION DATE: 20060405


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 ( Automated Logistical Specialist) medically separated for a left knee injury. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “ l eft knee: anterior cruciate ligament deficiency with instability” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions ( l ow back pain and headaches) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the left knee injury as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The applicant makes no specific contention in her application. Her complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20060128
 VA* - (~6 Days Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Injury t o Left Knee… 5257 20% Chronic Strain Left Knee with Pain and Instability, Torn
 Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear		 5257 10% 20060411
Other x 2 (Not In Scope)
Other x 4
RATING: 20%
 RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60918 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) ) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Knee Injury Condition. The CI injured her left knee while running in November 2004. She was treated with medications and duty restrictions without resolution. She was then evaluated in orthopedics and found to have a torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) which was confirmed on MRI. The latter also showed a possible tear of the medial meniscus (MMT), a cartilage cushion in the knee which was not demonstrated on physical examination. Reconstructive surgery was recommended; however, the CI chose not to pursue this option due to her current living situation. She was on the 4th floor of a building without stairs and stationed in a hilly area; her decision was considered reasonable. The narrative summary (NARSUM) was dated 20 July 2005, 9 months prior to separation. On examination, she had a normal gait and no effusion. The range-of-motion (ROM) showed slightly reduced flexion at 135 degrees (140 is normal) and normal extension. The knee showed signs of instability consistent with a torn ACL. Signs of meniscal irritation were absent. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed 6 days after separation, the CI reported continued pain and limping at the end of the day. She denied locking, but endorsed “giving way.” She was noted to have a normal and antalgic gait (an antalgic gait is abnormal due to protecting the gait from pain). The ROM was normal without further change with repetition. Signs of meniscal irritation were absent. Testing for ACL deficiency remained positive.

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the left knee at 20%, coded 5257 (other impairment of the knee). The VA used the same code, but rated the knee at 10% based on the C&P examination. The Board considered the findings and found no route to a rating higher than the 20% adjudicated by the PEB. A dual code rating is not supported as there is no compensable loss of motion. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the left knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left knee condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.












The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131223, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review






 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150013681 (PD201400005)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

        

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00097

    Original file (PD-2014-00097.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee ROM (Degrees)Ortho Addendum 4 Mo. In keeping with the subjective instability the CI experienced and the “mild instability” documented by the orthopedic specialist, Board members agree that the CI’s right...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00064

    Original file (PD2013 00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “anterior knee pain after left anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). There was no instability and examination of ligaments of the left knee was symmetrical compared to the uninjured left knee. Both the PEB and the VA rated the condition as 10% for painful motion of a major joint with similar coding (5010-5003 and 5257-5010 respectively).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796

    Original file (PD-2013-02796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01984

    Original file (PD-2014-01984.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board deliberated on if the CI’s degree of instability with additional meniscal signs of catching and pain with knee degeneration warranted a “severe” 30% rating under 5257, or dual knee rating with additional rating under 5259 for meniscal symptoms (catching and pain)that did not overlap with ACL instability symptoms (instability). The prior to separation VA exam documented normal hand findings. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00834

    Original file (PD-2014-00834.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “left ACL tear,”as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39andVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01645

    Original file (PD2012 01645.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Persistent Anterior Knee Pain Condition .The CI originally had a sport-related injury to his right knee in September 2001.A torn anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was addressed arthroscopically in November 2001,followed by rehabilitative treatment.The CI re-injured his right knee (buckled and popped) while stepping from an aircraft in January 2002, and required a right ACLallograft reconstruction in March 2002.He did well post-operatively with progressive physical therapy (PT) until another...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02134

    Original file (PD-2014-02134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Condition . (Normal: 140 and 0 degrees).On an orthopedic exam on 7 May 2001, surgical incisions were well healed and the knee had no lateral instability (varus/valgus) but mild “laxity” at the ACL repair site (1A Lachman test).At the MEB/NARSUM evaluationon 25 June 2001, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported a continued inability to walk or run without knee pain. Mild anterior laxity was again noted (1A Lachman test).ROM results are in the chart below.On the DD Form 2808...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00622

    Original file (PD2012-00622.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Sep 135⁰ 0⁰ 140⁰ 0⁰ ROM additionally limited by pain; slight anterior subluxation with some instability 10% 10%* Left Knee ROM Flexion (140⁰ Normal) Extension (0⁰ Normal) Comment §4.71a Rating 5099-5003 or 5010 5257 +painful motion and tenderness; 1A Lachman, +anterior drawer 10% 10%* *If instability conceded At the narrative summary (NARSUM) examination performed 3 months prior to separation (2 August 2002), the CI reported sharp anterior knee pain when twisting, and occasional swelling...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00772

    Original file (PD-2014-00772.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2014-00772BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20141030 Right Knee Pain Condition . The CI underwent right knee arthroscopy in June 2003 at which time a lateral meniscal tear was repaired, but no ACL tear was present.Follow-up right knee X-rays showed mild changes of osteoarthritis.Ongoing pain led to a second arthroscopy in November 2004 that involved operative repair of cartilage lesions; the ACL...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00930

    Original file (PD-2014-00930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain, Patellofemoral Syndrome, s/p Arthroscopy x25099-500310%Degenerative Arthritis, Left Knee5260-500310%20110803 Internal Derangement, Left Knee5003-525730%20110803Other x0Other x1 RATING: 10%RATING: 40%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20120720(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Left Knee Pain . After review by a Decision Review Officer, the VA applied two different VASRD codes to the left...