Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02487
Original file (PD-2013-02487.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-02487
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141010
SEPARATION DATE: 20040805


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (31R/Multichannel Transmissions Systems Operator) medically separated for a back problem. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “slight, constant low back pain (LBP) due to ankylosing spondylitis,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “low back pain due to ankylosing spondylitis w/o neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI writes: “Ankylosing spondylitis—this causes me constant pain and discomfort in my hips and lower back which has cause major health issues with myself. I believe this should be reviewed for a higher percentage. Major depressive disorder—my depression is seeming to be affecting me more and more each day, I am on medicine and see a psych doctor to talk with is helping but constantly in fear that I will succumb to this. Sinusitis—Been to the emergency room because this gets so bad with the sneezing and pressure. Pes Planus—this has progressively gotten worse with time and have spent a lot of money on insoles for shoes to help relieve the pain. Left Knee—Because of the injury to my left knee in the Army and my “something” and meniscus had to be repaired or reconstruction, or replaced with the add of screws in Jan of 2008. Right Knee—because of injuries sustained while in the Army I constantly have swelling and discomfort in this knee”. [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting LBP due to ankylosing spondylitis condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions (the contended major depression, sinusitis, pes planus, left and right knees) are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board as none of the contended conditions were on either the MEB or PEB documents. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040604
 VA – Failed to Report
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back Pain due to Ankylosing Spondylitis w/o Neurologic Abnormality 5240 10% Ankylosing Spondylitis 5240 0% N/A
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 3
Rating: 10%
 Rating: 50%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41109 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain due to Ankylosing Spondylitis. The CI had a long history of LBP starting from an injury and evaluation on 6 April 1998 after lifting sand bags. He was re-evaluated for LBP on 2 July 2001, which documented numerous other evaluations in the past, including back class treatment. At that time, the pain was persistent since January 2001 with no history of trauma. The examination showed tenderness of the lower lumbosacral tenderness. There were normal gait and full range of motion (ROM) at that exam. An X-ray of the spine found bilateral sacroiliac sclerosis, and lumbar spine pseudarthrosis. A computerized axial tomography study (CT scan) of the sacroiliac joints found multiple small cysts and sclerosis of the inferior 1/3 of both sacroiliac joints. He was evaluated by rheumatology on 24 September 2004. The CI was diagnosed at that visit with seronegative spondyloarthropathy (of which ankylosing spondylitis is one).

The narrative summary (NARSUM) performed on 22 March 2004, 4 months prior to separation, noted the 3.5 years of pain after lifting a heavy object. He was tested and diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis and been treated by rheumatology since. The pain was of the lower midline of the spine radiating into both hip areas. Pain was increased by bending, lifting, stairs and any vigorous exercise; the pain worsened the next day after any extra walking. The pain was constant all day, some days worse than other days, and did not interfere with sleep. He used Percocet (narcotic) medication once or twice a week when pain was so bad he could not stand it, he used Mobic (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory) medication daily and Ambien for sleep. Physical examination revealed he walked slowly. There were muscle spasms of the lower lumbar musculature bilaterally, accentuated when bending at the waist. Flexion was 50 degrees, extension 20 degrees, right lateral flexion 30 degrees, left lateral flexion 15 degrees, right rotation was 15 degrees, and left rotation was 20 degrees. There was no VA Compensation and Pension exam of the spine due to no-show.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Board considered VASRD diagnostic code 5240 (ankylosing spondylitis) used by the PEB for a 10% rating, and the VA for a 0% rating. This condition is rated under the VASRD General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. The Board found evidence of ROM limitations greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees (measured at 50 degrees) for a rating under this code of 20%. There were no possible alternate or additional coding options for a rating in the CI’s favor above 20%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence, and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the ankylosing spondylitis condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the ankylosing spondylitis condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5240 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Ankylosing Spondylitis Condition 5240 20%
RATING 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131107, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record





                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150005541 (PD201302487)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02082

    Original file (PD-2013-02082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Ankylosing Spondylitis Condition .Absent direct inciting trauma, the CI developed sudden and severe low back pain (LBP) in late 2001 and first sought medical care in March 2002.Initially, he was hospitalized for 5 days with a discharge diagnosis of right-sided lumbosacral pain and instructed to follow-up with physical therapy. Additionally, “fingertips to the level of the fibular head” is an accepted descriptive pictorial of normal thoracolumbar lateral flexion of at least 30...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01975

    Original file (PD2012 01975.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “ankylosing spondylitis, associated with bilateral sacroiilitis and hip pain” as unfitting, rated 20% in accordance with the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separatedwith a 20% disability rating. The Board opined that in the absence of systemic symptoms of an active process,the AS condition was best rated based on the residual limitation of lumbar spine...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02720

    Original file (PD-2013-02720.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was followed up in neurology on 29 August 2006 and noted to have a normal motor examination. These measurements are also more consistent with the final clinical note prior to separation which recorded near resolution of symptoms. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00191

    Original file (PD 2012 00191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was then medically separated with a 20% combined disability rating. A C&P examination on 15 April 2006, 6 months after separation, for the ankles and knees noted that the CI had most of his pain in the knees and ankles, but that the hips and back were also involved. The Board determined that the MEB examination and ROM better fit the condition of the CI at the time of separation.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02063

    Original file (PD2013 02063.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that his case may eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of his MH condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed during that process. At the MEB examination on 8 September 2005, the CI reported chronic LBP. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00343

    Original file (PD 2014 00343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic low back and hip pain condition, characterized as “Chronic low back and hip pain,”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back and hip pain”as unfitting, rated 10%with likely application of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39and VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The rating for the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00837

    Original file (PD2012-00837.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON: Service PEB – Dated 20021223 Condition Chronic Pain, SI Joint Arthritis and Lumbar Spine DDD Code 5003 Rating 20% No Additional MEB/PEB Entries VA (1 Mo. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION Sacroiliac Joint Osteoarthritis and Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbosacral Spine VASRD CODE RATING 5003 COMBINED 20% 20% 3 PD1200837 The following...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02758

    Original file (PD-2013-02758.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20071123 Since then, he had noted re-aggravation of his LBP. The Board noted that the ROM for both the MEB and VA examinations supports a 20% rating, but the criteria for a 40% rating are not met.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01222

    Original file (PD-2013-01222.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The orthopedic surgeon noted that X-rays of the lumbosacral spine and the sacroiliac joints were normal. On examination, recorded on form DD Form 2808, the extremity examination only noted the sacroiliac joint pain on the right and no abnormality of the knee was recorded.There was no VA C&P examination proximate to separation (the first after separation examination was 8 September 2004, 17 months after separation).The Board first considered whether the right knee pain was unfitting when...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01013

    Original file (PD2012 01013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back and associated joint pain conditions, characterized as “chronic low back pain” and “bilateral sacroiliac joint pain,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR40-501. The Board reviewed the examinations in evidence above and found the VA exam most proximate to separation and with tabulated normal ROM to have the most probative value; however, the Board noted that the PEB examination, 3 months earlier, was also complete and had compensable loss of motion. ...