Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01921
Original file (PD-2013-01921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01921
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140620
SEPARATION DATE: 20040809


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSgt/E-5 (2W1/Aircraft Armament Systems) medically separated for chronic back pain. The condition did not improve adequately to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L4 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic back pain was found medically unacceptable and forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic thoracic and low back pain” as unfitting, rated it 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI’s CONTENTION: “Degenerative disc disease was not given more consideration. Disability was based on GERD – later diagnosis of celiac disease and GERD.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back pain condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – dated 20040526
 VA – (1 mo. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain 5237 10% Degenerative Disc Disease 5243 0% 20040922
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 4 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60304 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Back Pain. This CI has had a long history of back pain. At times he complained of thoracic back pain, but mostly his pain was low back pain (LBP). He had multiple imaging studies and consults with specialists. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine showed congenital anomalies at L4-L5 consistent with lack of segmentation or partial bony fusion. No herniated disc or degenerative bony changes were seen. In spite of all diagnostic efforts, the cause of the back pain was uncertain. In fall of 2003, the CI requested MEB. The narrative summary was dictated on 1 April 2004, but the MEB physical examination (PE) was performed in November 2003. At that exam, there was full and symmetric range-of-motion (ROM) in all extremities. Muscle strength was normal (5 out of 5). Straight leg raise (SLR) was negative. There was no tenderness to palpation of the spine or paravertebral muscles. Specific measurements for thoracolumbar ROM were not recorded. The CI denied any paresthesia or weakness of any extremity. The CI was medically separated from service in August 2004. Six weeks later, he had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. The CI reported that his LBP was continuous and was the same every day. He denied any numbness or weakness. Posture, gait and spinal curvature were normal. The spine was not painful with motion. PE of the back revealed no objective evidence of painful motion, spasm, weakness or tenderness. Thoracolumbar ROM was measured and is summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 VA C&P ~ 6 weeks Post-Sep
(20040922)
Flexion (90 Normal) 90
Extension (30) 30
R Lat Flexion (30) 30
L Lat Flexion (30) 30
R Rotation (30) 30
L Rotation (30) 30
Combined (240) 240
Comment N o painful motion
§4.71a Rating 0%
invalid font number 31502

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and the VA chose different coding and rating options for the back pain condition. The September 2004 C&P exam was performed just 6 weeks after separation and therefore had significant probative value. At that exam, the CI’s posture, gait, spinal curvature and thoracolumbar ROM were all normal. There was no pain with motion. Physical examination of the back revealed no objective evidence of painful motion, spasm, weakness or tenderness. The Board also considered the matter of peripheral neuropathy. After reviewing all available evidence, there was insufficient evidence of a clinically significant neuropathy that interfered with performance of military duties. Therefore, the Board concluded that there was no unfitting radiculopathy present at the time of separation. The Board determined that IAW the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a, the chronic back pain condition was essentially non-compensable. However, IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board is not permitted to reduce the disability rating assigned by the PEB. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends no change in the PEB adjudication of the chronic back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic back pain condition and IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.
The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130925, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. § 1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01921.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,







 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02448

    Original file (PD 2014 02448.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain with degenerative disc disease”as unfitting, rated 10%, referencing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 03102

    Original file (PD 2014 03102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB and VA both rated the back condition at 20% for decreased spinal ROM using different codes;the PEB used code 5241 (spinal fusion) and the VA, code 5237,(lumbosacral strain), IAW VASRD §4.71a.A rating of 20%, under both codes, requires forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine of greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees.The next higher rating, 40%, under both codes requires forward flexion of 30 degrees or less or ankylosis of the entire thoraco- lumbar spine. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01580

    Original file (PD-2013-01580.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Low Back Pain (LBP) . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02385

    Original file (PD-2013-02385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the data from the back examinations noted above. At that exam, thoracolumbar ROM was normal. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01500

    Original file (PD 2014 01500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He took no medication for his back pain condition. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01530

    Original file (PD 2014 01530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-SepFlexion (90 Normal)“Guarding occurring at 10⁰ off vertical” (with pain)90(70) 68/66/6880Combined (240)Unk/incomplete--240220230Comment“otherwise deferred”; painful motion; tendernessNo painful motion; normal gait; normal peripheral nerve examTender;painful motion“ Pain from 80-90⁰ flexion” §4.71a Rating10%-40%0% (VA NSC)10%10% (VA 10%)The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00010

    Original file (PD 2014 00010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB found the chronic LBPunfittingand rated it 20%with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The sleep apnea condition was adjudicated as Category II (a condition that can be unfitting, but not currently compensable or ratable).The CI made no appeals and was separated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02574

    Original file (PD-2013-02574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050508 Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain due to Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease…5299-524220%Paravertebral Muscle Spasms…5293-529240%VA PN*Right Leg Radiculopathy…5293-852010%VA PN*No Additional MEB/PEB Entries in Scope Combined: 60%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050826. Muscle strength in the bilateral lower extremity was normal and sensory examination recorded decreased pinprick sensation in the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01227

    Original file (PD 2013 01227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01227BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20141104 SEPARATION DATE: 20041022 I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01924

    Original file (PD 2014 01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20080711VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Lumbar DDD523710%Lumbar DDD with Radiculopathy524220%STROther X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1 Combined: 10%Combined: 30%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20090124 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. A...