Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01876
Original file (PD-2013-01876.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-01876
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140617
SEPARATION DATE: 20040604


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard SSG/E-6 (12B/Combat Engineer) medically separated for chronic bilateral foot pain. The bilateral foot condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). His profile allowed for an alternate aerobic event to satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Bilateral foot pain was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic bilateral foot pain as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI concurred with both the MEB and PEB findings and recommendation, made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I believe that my rating is inaccurate because I was only rated disability on my feet. I was told by medical staff at Fort Stewart, GA, that my feet were bad enough to divorce me from the military. And the rest of my disabilities they didn’t care about after the DOD discharge me. I would have up to one year to visit VA (Veterans Affairs) for the rest of my disabilities. I was never given any rating by DOD for my back conditions, which I had nerve damage caused by bulging disc which push against the nerve root w/o cause severe pain on the outside of my feet. I also had a h/o (history of gout) which never evaluated PTSD was combat related in Bosnia. I was never rate by the DOD, diarrhea was never evaluated by DOD. Varicose veins was never evaluated by DOD. Dermatitis w/folliculitis was not evaluated by DOD. Middle finger right long I was never evaluated by DOD.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting bilateral feet condition are addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The requested back, gout, posttraumatic stress disorder, diarrhea, varicose veins, dermatitis with folliculitis and right long middle finger were not identified by the MEB or PEB, and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR).


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040507
 VA - (1.75 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Foot Pain 5099-5003 10% Arthralgia of the Left Foot 5009-5003 10%* 20040728
Arthralgia of the Right Foot 5009-5003 10%* 20040728
Hallux Valgus, Left 5280 0%* 20040728
Hallux Valgus, Right 5280 0%* 20040728
Other x 0 (Not is Scope)
 Other x 10
Rating: 10%
 Combined Rating: 60%
*Effective 20060925 the VA combined these to one condition, 5299-5276 rated 10% ( 20070405 VARD ) .

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s assertions that his disability disposition was unfair and did not include other conditions. It is noted for the record that the Board has no jurisdiction to investigate or render opinions in reference to such allegations; and, redress in excess of the Board’s scope of recommendations (as noted above) must be addressed by the BCMR and/or the United States judiciary system. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Bilateral Foot Pain. Available treatment records document that the CI initially presented with foot pain in December 2003, while performing a training exercise. At that time, he reported pain in his feet with running, prolonged standing and walking. The physical examination revealed pain over the metatarsal joints bilaterally; worsened with flexion and extension. The examiner opined that there was probably degenerative joint disease.

The narrative summary noted that the CI reported (10 on a scale of 1 to 10) severe, constant bilateral foot pain. The physical examination was significant for tenderness to palpation, left greater than right, foot pain without evidence of swelling. Radiographic evaluation showed bilateral Achilles spurs and borderline right hallux valgus with left dorsal first metatarsophalangeal joint degenerative changes. The gait was noted as “somewhat antalgic” with decreased foot range-of-motion (ROM), left greater than right. There were not assistive devices used for ambulation. At the VA Compensation and Pension examination performed a month after separation, the CI reported pain with prolonged standing which was worse in the morning and with activity. The CI was not on any medications for pain. The physical examination was significant for tenderness to palpation at the metatarsophalangeal joints bilaterally with full ROM bilaterally; no change in function with repetitive use.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the chronic bilateral foot condition as unfitting with probable application of the USAPDA pain policy of slight/constant and a 10% disability rating analogous to degenerative arthritis, VASRD code 5099-5003. The PEB’s 10% rating was supported by the USAPDA pain policy, but was not consistent with the VASRD §4.71a rating criteria for the foot. Members agreed that the functional limitations in evidence justified the conclusion that the functional limitations of each foot were integral to the CI’s inability to perform his MOS and, accordingly each foot was separately unfitting and separate ratings are recommended. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for each foot IAW VASRD §4.59, painful motion and §4.40, functional loss for the chronic bilateral foot pain condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy DoDI 1332.39 for rating the chronic bilateral foot pain condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the chronic bilateral foot pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10% for each foot, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a and §4.59, painful motion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left Foot Pain 5099-5003 10%
Right Foot Pain 5099-5003 10%
COMBINED(w/BLF) 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131016, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001209 (PD201301876)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01215

    Original file (PD-2013-01215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The bilateral feet, pubic symphysis, bilateral wrist and left ankle condition, characterized as “bilateral foot bunionectomies with chronic pain,”“pubic symphysis pain,” “bilateral wrist pain,” and “left ankle pain” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Bilateral Feet Following Bunionectomy, Pubic Symphysis, Bilateral Wrists, Left Ankle5099-500310%Residuals of Bunionectomies Both...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01465

    Original file (PD-2013-01465.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The knee and feet conditions, characterized as “right medial and lateral meniscal tears” and “bilateral foot pain”, were the only two conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB combined the two conditions and adjudicated “chronic pain, right knee and bilateral feet”as unfitting, rated 10%,citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01640

    Original file (PD-2013-01640.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain, Left Ankle0%Left Ankle Strain5299-528420%20051110+20050610recordsBunion, Right Foot5280---%Hallux Valgus, Right Great Toe52800%20051110Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 12 RATING: 0%RATING: 60% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060501(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Chronic Pain, Left Ankle Condition . The records noted normal feet on the CI’s entry exam (see above) and right foot pain had onset...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00160

    Original file (PD-2014-00160.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting low back and bilateral foot conditions are addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain 52370%Spondylosis of the Lumbar Spine with Degenerative Disc Disease5243-523910%20041229Bilateral Foot Pain5099-50030%Bilateral Foot Condition5299-5278Not Service ConnectedOther x 2 (Not in Scope)Other x 1 Combined: 0%Combined:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00537

    Original file (PD 2012 00537.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEBadjudicated “chronic pain, both heels, due to bone spurs and Achilles tendonitis”as unfitting, rated at 10%,citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The PEB rated the bilateral Achilles tendonitis, heel spurs, and chronic heel painat 10% (Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities [VASRD] code 5003; degenerative arthritis) citing slight/frequent pain IAW USAPDA pain policy. The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01998

    Original file (PD-2013-01998.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pain medication required.” *VARD dated 25 July 2008 rated Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, right ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and Posterior Tibial Tendonitis, left ankle 10% using code 5271 effective 24 March 2008 and retained a 30% rating using code 5299-5276 for bilateral pes planus and plantar fasciitis (previously evaluated as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction bilaterally, plantar fasciitis bilaterally) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the CI’s information...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01642

    Original file (PD-2013-01642.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The conditions, characterized as “degenerative joint disease of the left knee,” “metatarsal deformity,” and “callous/corn,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEBadjudicated the knee and foot conditions as unfitting, rated them as a single unfitting condition at 10%, citing application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01845

    Original file (PD 2012 01845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW VASRD rating guidelines. Pain management notes in the service treatment record (STR) indicate that post tarsal tunnel release the CI continued with pain in both feet, rated at 6 to 7 out of 10 on the left and 9 out of 10 on the right. At the VA exam bilateral foot sensation was noted to be normal.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02311

    Original file (PD-2013-02311.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The BLEconditions, characterized as “quadriceps tendinopathy” and “stress reaction tibia” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral knee pain with right greater than left chronic quadriceps tendon insertional pain,” and “bilateral leg pain consistent with posteromedial tibial stress reaction,”as unfitting, rated at 10%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02517

    Original file (PD-2013-02517.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends separate right and left disability ratings of 10% each for the bilateral (neuralgia) foot condition. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy DoDI 1332.39 for rating the bilateral foot condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board.In the matter of the cervical spine condition, the Board...