Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01354
Original file (PD-2013-01354.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   C ASE: PD-2013-01354
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 2014 1125
Separation Date: 20040421


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve SSG/E-6 (92A/Automated Logistics Specialist) medically separated for asthma. The asthma could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty; however, his profile indicated he could do an alternate event for his physical fitness test. He was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The asthma condition, characterized as “mild persistent asthma,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “mild persistent asthma” as unfitting, rated 10%, w ith application of the Veteran Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI non-concurred with the IPEB findings but did not submit a written appeal. A review by the US Army Physical Disability Agency reaffirmed the IPEB’s findings and the CI was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI writes: “I feel my asthma condition warranted a higher rating at the time of discharge.”


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting asthma condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20040308
 VA - (9 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Mild Persistent Asthma 6602 10% Exercise Induced Asthma 6602 10% 20050107
Other x0
 Other x3
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050217 (most proxi mate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.
Mild Persistent Asthma Condition . The CI developed symptoms of recurrent shortness of breath (SOB) with exertion and intermittent heart palpitations. He underwent a cardiac workup for the heart murmur which revealed a flow murmur. The physician considered asthma as part of his differential diagnosis because of the SOB and exertional dyspnea. The CI underwent a m ethacholine c hallenge t est which was positive for asthma as the test demonstrated a greater than 20% drop in lung function. The internal medicine specialist diagnosed mild asthma and started the CI on an A lbuterol inhaler to use as needed and before exercising; and also prescribed Flovent (steroid inhaler) one puff twice daily; h e was doing fairly well with his asthma condition under control . . Th e CI was seen in the e mergency r oom on 13 August 2003 , for SOB , chest tightness with physical activity , ultimately the CI was given a permanent P3 p rofile for asthma . The c ommander’s st atement indicated that the CI’s physical condition created a burden for him and impact ed readiness and he was unable to serve in any combat environment. The CI was reevaluated by the Internal Medicine Specialist for increased SOB with exercise. The examiner noted that the CI was only using the Flovent 5 out of 7 days per week. The examiner stopped the Flovent and started Advair 500/50 twice daily (inhalational anti-inflammatory drug). The MEB narrative summary exam ( approximately 5 months prior to separation ), documented that the CI was using his Advair inhaler twice daily and Albuterol inhaler as needed. The chest exam revealed breath sounds that were bilateral and symmetrical, without any wheezing. The examiner diagnosed mild persistent asthma. During the VA Compensation and Pension exam ( approximately 9 months after separation ), the examiner documented that the CI required his Albuterol inhaler 2 months prior to this exam when he was running. The physical exam findings revealed that the lungs were clear bilaterally without wheezes. A p ulmonary f unction test demonstrated a non-compensable result interpreted as “ a minimal obstructive defect. ”

The Board directed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the mild persistent asthma as 6602 (asthma) and rated at 10%. The VA used coded 6602 (asthma), for exercise induced asthma, rated at 10%. The CI was started on Advair 500/50 twice daily in October 2003. At the time of the MEB exam, the CI was using the Advair as prescribed. The Board agreed that the CI met the 30% criteria of daily inhalational anti-inflammatory medication. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 30 % for the mild persistent a sthma condition.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the mild persistent asthma condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 30 %, coded 6602 IAW VASRD §4. 100. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows ; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Mild Persistent Asthma 6602 3 0%
COMBINED
 3 0%
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130913 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150006337 (PD201301354)


1. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) pertaining to the individual named in the subject line above to recharacterize the individual’s separation as a permanent disability retirement with the combined disability rating of 30% effective the date of the individual’s original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum:

         a. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         b. Providing orders showing that the individual was retired with permanent disability effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         c. Adjusting pay and allowances accordingly. Pay and allowance adjustment will account for recoupment of severance pay, and payment of permanent retired pay at 30% effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

         d. Affording the individual the opportunity to elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and medical TRICARE retiree options.



3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01908

    Original file (PD-2013-01908.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20040617 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01954

    Original file (PD-2013-01954.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050331 The Board found the CI met the higher 30% evaluation due to “ inhalational anti-inflammatory medication” (Advair)use at the time of separation as specified under code 6602.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 30% for the asthma condition. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02765

    Original file (PD-2013-02765.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The requested sleep apnea, anxiety, hypertension and rhinitis conditions were not identified by the PEB, and therefore not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board.Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Asthma Condition . The PEB TDRL exit rating was 10%,with the disability description stating: “not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01707

    Original file (PD-2013-01707.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01707BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20141107 The MEB physical exam noted a normal respiratory rate at rest and a normal lung examination.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM)(5 months prior to separation) noted a diagnosis of “mild persistent asthma, with exercise induced component.” The MEB dated 5 August 2005 (performed 4 months prior to separation) recommended a return to duty. The IPEB (7...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00352

    Original file (PD2013 00352.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050114 It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board noted that the NARSUM and multiple entries found in the service treatment record, months prior to separation, documented that daily use of inhaled anti-inflammatory medication (Advair, Azmacort or Flovent)and daily inhalational...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01508

    Original file (PD-2014-01508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20081230 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner documented that the CI was actively taking all prescribed medications.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02064

    Original file (PD-2013-02064.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20061204 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Asthma Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01963

    Original file (PD-2013-01963.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board next considered that at the time of separation, although the CI’s asthma was relatively well controlled,treatment notes in the STR, the MEB and C&P exams consistently documented use of the anti-inflammatory inhaler and oral bronchodilator medications, with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01970

    Original file (PD-2013-01970.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20050708VA -(7 Mos. Physical Disability Board of Review I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00234

    Original file (PD2013 00234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (shrapnel wound to the right upper arm, which met retention standards) to the PEB.The PEBadjudicated “asthma…” rated at 30%and placed the CI on the Temporary Retired Disability List (TDRL) in order for the condition to be stabilized by treatment.The remaining condition was determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appeals and was placed on the TDRL in November, 2004, where he continued to receive medical treatment. The Board’s...