Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00622
Original file (PD-2013-00622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-00622
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141112
SEPARATION DATE: 20040526


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSG/E-6 (13P/Multiple Launch Rocket System Operations/Fire Direction Specialist) medically separated for a left knee condition. There are no combat related personal awards in the evidence of record. The CI’s left knee could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). The CI was permitted to take the walking portion of the Army physical fitness test. He was issued a permanent L3/S1 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded “arthritis due to trauma and subsequent infection with pain and loss of function” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “arthritis left knee following multiple surgical procedures” unfitting rated at 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “ Due to having five left knee surgeries, one really bad infection from one of the surgery that left me in hospital once another week. I wasn’t nowhere near 100% and my unit deployed me to Iraq where I developed PTSD that affected my life to this day. Why wasn’t my PTSD included in Medical Separation Board. I’ve seen the doctor from November, 2003 to November ’04. Because I didn’t want to fight with the Army and get redeployed back to Iraq when I was still messed up and have things go back and forth. I just accepted the first thing they offer me, which was 20%. I know I should have received at least 30% or more. I didn’t get a fair rating.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that his case may eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of his mental health (MH) condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed during that process. The CI is also eligible for PDBR review of other conditions evaluated by the PEB and has elected review by the PDBR. The ratings for the unfitting left knee condition is are addressed below. In addition, in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of MH diagnoses that were changed during the Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, the CI’s case file was reviewed regarding diagnosis change, fitness determination, and rating of unfitting MH diagnoses (to include the contended posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD] condition) in accordance with the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.129 and §4.130. No additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040212
 VA - (4 and 11 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Arthritis Left Knee 5003 10% Left Knee DJD 5003 10%* 20050412
Scar, Left Knee 7805 0% 20040828
No MH Entry
 PTSD 9411 30% 20040918
Other x 0 (not in scope)
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%*
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 41122 ( most proximate to date of separation )
*Original VARD deferred rating for Left Knee DJD. VARD 20051227 granted 10% disability for Left Knee DJD, effective 20040527 (day after date of separation)


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Knee Condition. An operative reported dated 24 February 1998 noted persistent left knee instability after an injury and surgical debridement of a meniscal tear in 1997. The operative report documented a left knee arthroscopy and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The CI’s rehabilitation course consisted of physical therapy. The treatment records were silent for left knee pain until February 2002 when a treatment note documented persistent left knee pain with radiographic evidence of degenerative joint disease (DJD) and varus (outward bend at the knee) deformity. An orthopedic note dated 4 January 2003 noted “multiple other arthroscopic procedures” and that the CI was not a candidate for surgery to realign the knee and take the stress of the cartilage due to the extent of cartilaginous damage. The CI subsequently developed right knee pain which was diagnosed as DJD.

The narrative summary (NARSUM) examination dated 30 June 2004 documented that the CI was unable to run due to left knee swelling, locking, catching, and stiffness. The physical examination was significant for tenderness to palpation, ACL laxity, decreased flexion to 125 degrees, and marked atrophy of the medical aspect of the quadriceps. A diagnosis of post-traumatic osteoarthritis of left knee was rendered.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (performed 3 months after separation), the CI reported that he was unable to bend the left knee, squat or walk more than a few blocks, and stand for more than 15 minutes due to left knee pain. He reported use of a brace for the left knee. He continued use of antiinflammatory medications for pain. The physical examination demonstrated a normal gait, nontender-surgical portal scars, a stable knee, decreased flexion to 120 degrees, and the absence of quadriceps wasting. A diagnosis of left knee arthritis was rendered.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the left knee arthritis as unfitting. The PEB and VA rated that left knee arthritis at 10%, coded 5003 (degenerative arthritis). The Board considered whether there was evidence for a higher than 10% rating or dual rating for pain and instability. Multiple treatment notes and VA C&P examination documented evidence of a stable left knee after the ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopic and radiographic evaluation evidence left knee arthritis as the source of the persistent left knee pain. There was no evidence of knee ankylosis or compensable limitation flexion to 45 degrees or extension to 15 degrees for a rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left knee arthritis condition. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

Mental Health Condition. The Board’s main charge is to review the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the DES. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. There were no MH treatment notes available for review. The NARSUM noted sleep problems and anxiety after returning from Iraq. VA PTSD screening questions administered on 20 July 2004 were negative. At the VA initial PTSD examination dated 18 September 2004, the CI reported “psychiatric symptoms” since returning from deployment in 1991 which worsened with subsequent deployments. He reported occasional feelings of anxiety described as tremors, shortness of breath and increased heart rate last five to 20 minutes. He related his anxiety to his wartime experiences and reminders of those experiences. He reported re-experiencing, avoidance behavior, and emotion numbing and detachment. He denied direct combat. He was employed after separation and remained married. The mental status examination was normal except for a slightly guarded demeanor. The examiner determined that the CI met criteria for PTSD with a Global Assessment of Functioning score of 63 (mild). The VA rated the PTSD at 30% for occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks.

The Board reviewed the records for evidence of changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the DES. The available records evidenced that the CI was treated for symptoms of anxiety and insomnia; however had not received a formal MH evaluation with a formal diagnosis. The Board noted the diagnoses of depression, anxiety, and PTSD was listed on the DD Form 2808 without clinical documentation to support any MH diagnosis. Therefore, at the time of processing through the DES, no MH diagnoses were changed to the CI’s possible disadvantage. This applicant, therefore, did not appear to meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The Board considered whether any mental condition, regardless of specific diagnosis, was unfitting for continued military service. Board members agreed that evidence of the record reflected minimal MH related symptoms. There was evidence of psychotropic medication prescription and use prior to separation for sleep problems and anxiety symptoms. The commander’s statement, 4 months prior to separation, noted that the CI’s profiled medical condition prevented him from performing the duties of his MOS. No MH conditions were profiled. There was no emergency room or unscheduled clinic visits nor psychiatric hospitalizations for any MH condition. The Board concluded that the preponderance of evidence did not support an unfit determination for any MH disorder at the time of evaluation in the DES or prior to separation and therefore, none were subject to disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left knee arthritis condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended PTSD condition or MHR, the Board unanimously determined that no mental condition, regardless of specific diagnosis, was unfitting for continued military service. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130911, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150006402 (PD201300622)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00258

    Original file (PD-2013-00258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions were characterized as “right elbow pain and stiffness… and “right knee pain and stiffness” by the MEB and forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The 20 October 2005 (seven months post-separation) VA compensation and pension (C&P) exam documented the 1985 right knee injury, but recorded no subsequent injuries. In the matter of the right knee condition and right elbow condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00443

    Original file (PD 2012 00443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that the PEB combined the bilateral knee and ankle pain as a single unfitting condition coded 5003 and rated 10%. The Board first considered the knees and ankles to determine if they were separately unfitting and, if so, the appropriate rating. At the VA C&P examination, 4 months after separation, the CI reported bilateral ankle pain and intermittent swelling.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02590

    Original file (PD-2013-02590.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mid-Back Pain Condition . There was no increase in kyphosis at T12.The diagnosis rendered was T12 compression fracture with recalcitrant activity associated back pain.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on25 October 2007, 4 months after separation, the CI reported slight sensory impairment at the site of the fracture at the thoracolumbar junction and in the lower sacral area extending to the gluteal fold along the left side of the buttock. The Board determined that there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00808

    Original file (PD-2014-00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Cervical Strain523710%Cervical Strain523710%20060620Bilateral Knees and 1 st Metatarsophalangeal Joint, DJD500310%Left Knee Strain526010%20060620Right Knee Strain526010%20060620DJD, Bilateral Great Toes500310%20060620Chronic Right Shoulder Pain Secondary to Impingement Syndrome5099-50030%Right Shoulder Impingement Syndrome520110%20060620Depressive Disorder, NOSNot UnfittingAnxiety Disorder941330%20060607Other x 2 (Not in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00667

    Original file (PD2013 00667.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that her case may eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of any mental health condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose mental health diagnoses were changed or eliminated during that process. Left Knee Condition . Although the CI was seen in the mental health...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02810

    Original file (PD-2013-02810.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the three knee conditions as one condition, “chronic bilateral knee pain”, rated at 10% citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . In the matter of the chronic bilateral knee pain condition, the Board , by an majority vote, recommends that each knee is separately unfitting and should be rated as follows : chronic right knee pain condition coded as 50 99-5003, rated at 10% and the chronic left knee...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01682

    Original file (PD2013 01682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “ chronic right knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. Radiographs of the right knee noted mild degenerative changes but were otherwise within normal.The MEB examiner noted a pain rating of slight/frequent. The Board agreed that the CI’s disability due to the knee condition met the 10% rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00582

    Original file (PD 2013 00582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A new MEB was done and identified and forwarded generalized anxiety disorder and alcoholdependence as medically acceptable.The Informal PEBadjudicated chronic bilateral knee pain, chronic back pain, due to DDD, without neurologic abnormality and sensorineural hearing loss as unfitting, rated 10%, 10%, and 0%respectively, citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policyand the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02018

    Original file (PD2013 02018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board noted that the VA initially rated the CI for depression with insomnia and did not change the diagnosis until over 3 years after separation, based on the 10 July 2012 C&P evaluation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01110

    Original file (PD2013 01110.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a Reserve component active duty second lieutenant (prior-enlisted)/O-1E (66H00/Registered Nurse) medically separated for chondromalacia of the left knee, diagnosed on arthroscopy, present several years, and for “major depressive disorder, atypical, known to have existed prior to service (EPTS) by history, without permanent service aggravation (PSA).”The CI enlisted in 1996 at...