RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
injections
into
treatment, nine
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1200850 SEPARATION DATE: 20050426
BOARD DATE: 20130116
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (19K/Armor Crewman), medically separated
for right shoulder pain. The CI initially entered active duty in February 1994, and remained on
active duty until leaving active service with an honorable discharge in September of 1996. He
re-entered active service in March 1999. In August of 1999 he reported a 2 month history of
right shoulder pain with no traumatic event. He underwent a long course of physiotherapy
followed by orthopedic evaluation and
the right
acromioclavicular (AC--shoulder) joint with no real improvement of the symptoms. He then
underwent an orthopedic Mumford procedure (clavicle resection) in December of 2000. In
November of 2002 he deployed to Kosovo, but was later re-deployed due to his shoulder and
his inability to adequately perform his duties. He then underwent a Medical Military
Occupational Specialty (MOS) Retention Board and was going to be re-classified into the 42A
Administrative Specialist MOS, but it was finally determined that he could not meet the
standards of that MOS or perform some required solider skills. He was given a permanent U3
profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) for “Shoulder pain, secondary to
Mumford procedure as a result of A/C joint degenerative disease of unknown origin on the
right.” The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)
adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the right shoulder pain condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with
cited application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made
no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “The Shoulder Impingement also called bursitis or tendonitis, shoulder
impingement refers to the pain in the shoulder caused by the rotator cuff tendons being
pinched or squeezed between the humerus (arm bone) and the scapula (shoulder blade) as the
arm is raised. This may be due to the natural shape of your shoulder, or from a bone spur
rubbing (impinging) on the tendons as they move. Experts consider this is the earliest stage of
rotator cuff problems. A distal clavicle excision is a surgical procedure performed to relieve
pain in the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, which often develops as a result of a fall or other type
of trauma. AC injuries may cause the two bones to move or separate, or the ligaments to
stretch or tear. While conservative treatments are often used as initial treatment, surgery is
needed in many cases to restore the position of the clavicle and allow the patient to resume
normal functioning. During the procedure, a small part of the clavicle is removed to create a
space between the two bones. I had this procedure complete on my right shoulder, while in
military service. Continuing to have pain in my right shoulder & left shoulder is showing the
same symptoms of my right shoulder before surgery.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those conditions “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for
Service PEB – Dated 20041220
Condition
Right Shoulder Pain
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 0%
Code
5099-5003
Rating
0%
VA (~3.5 Mos. Pre-Separation) – All Effective Date 20050426
Condition
Right
Residuals
Not Service-Connected x 3
Combined: 10%
Code
5299-5024
Rating
10%
Shoulder
Surgery
Exam
20050105
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Right Shoulder Pain Condition. The CI was right hand dominant. The goniometric range-of-
motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating
recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the
chart below.
unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The rated condition right shoulder pain as
requested for consideration is the only condition that meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI
6040.44 for Board purview; and, is addressed below. The requested left shoulder condition,
and any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the
Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Right Shoulder ROM
(Degrees)
Flexion (0-180⁰)
Abduction (0-180⁰)
Comments: Surgery >4
yr. Pre-Sep
§4.71a Rating
NARSUM ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep
130
170
Some
and
moderate discomfort with
motion
10% (PEB 0%)
crepitus
VA C&P ~3.5 Mo. Pre-Sep
108 / 95*
115 / 95*
Pain on motion; *After 5 reps
(DeLuca)
10%-20% (VA 10%)
At the MEB exam, the CI reported persistent shoulder pain and weakness which was increased
with activity and loading. The MEB physical exam noted previous resection and reconstruction
of the right AC joint in 2000 for AC joint pain that had not improved post-surgery or with
physical therapy. There was tenderness at the right AC joint, 5/5 (normal) strength and limited
ROMs with crepitus as summarized above. Radiographs indicated postoperative Mumford on
the right shoulder and the narrative summary diagnosis was “Shoulder pain, secondary to
Mumford procedure as a result of A/C joint degenerative disease of unknown origin on the
right.” The MEB DD Form 2808 noted right shoulder pain with overhead rotation above 90
degrees and positive crepitus. The U3 profile restriction stated “no mandatory overhead
activities” and the commander’s statement indicated “even individual movement techniques
are particularly difficult and painful for (the CI).”
At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed prior to separation, the CI
reported he could not wear his military load bearing equipment without pain. The exam is
summarized above and indicated pain-limited ROMs. The examiner’s functional assessment
included a statement that “(the CI) has voluntarily switched performing several activities to his
left nondominant, to include using the computer mouse, carrying heavy suitcases, and some
overhead work. The veteran otherwise can undertake all other activities of normal daily living.”
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
Board considered alternate coding under code 5203 (Clavicle or scapula), 5024 (Tenosynovitis)
or 5201 (Arm, limitation of motion). There was no mention of loose motion on either exam for
coding above 10% under 5203. The Board considered the probative values of the two exams in
evidence and adjudged the VA exam, which was closer to separation and included an
assessment of repetitive motion (DeLuca criteria) had the highest probative value for rating at
the time of separation. The Board deliberated if the flexion and abduction limitation to 95
degrees on the VA exam following repetition (DeLuca) with the CI’s described functional loss
more closely approximated the 20% criteria under code 5201 for limitation “at shoulder level.”
The VA rating determination specified the VA rating was for flexion limited to 108 degrees and
did not mention DeLuca or the C&P-recorded more limited ROM following repetition. After due
deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of
reasonable doubt), §4.7 (Higher of two evaluations), §4.59 (Painful motion) and DeLuca criteria,
the Board majority recommends a disability rating of 20% for the right shoulder condition
coded 5003-5201.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB
reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the right shoulder was operant in this case and
the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the
right shoulder condition, the Board, by a vote of 2:1 recommends a disability rating of 20%,
coded 5003-5201 IAW VASRD §4.71a. The single voter for dissent (who recommended a 10%
rating coded 5099-5003) did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other
conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
VASRD CODE RATING
5003-5201
COMBINED
20%
20%
UNFITTING CONDITION
Right Shoulder Pain
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120606, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130002544 (PD201200850)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20%
without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01072
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army CASE NUMBER: PD1201072SEPARATION DATE: 20021213 He was issued a permanent U3 profile (131111) andreferred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board(PEB) adjudication.The PEB adjudicated his shoulder condition as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01540
In 2005 I was only medical boarded and rated 20% for my Right Shoulder. The Board considered that following the two surgeries, the CI had painful limited left shoulder ROM with evidence of posttraumatic arthritis on X-rays. Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00666
Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20070105 Condition Chronic Neck Pain Chronic R/Shoulder Pain S/P AC Separation PTSD Hearing Loss/Tinnitus Code 5241 Rating 10% 5099-5003 10% Not Unfitting Not Unfitting Condition Cervical Fusion C5-6-7 w/Hardware DJD R/Acromioclavicular Joint w/Fractured Clavicle PTSD Tinnitus Bilateral Hearing Loss Code 5241 5201 9411 6260 6100 Rating 10%* 20% 50% 10% 0% Exam 20070306 20070306 20070306 20070306 20070306 ↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ Combined: 20% 0% X...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01539
Left Shoulder Condition . Treatment records supported findings of instability after surgical repair and an emergency department visit in May 2003 (8 months prior to separation) documented a left shoulder dislocation.The MEB physical exam performed 6 months prior to separation documented shoulder range-of-motion (ROM) of 160 degrees of flexion (180 degrees normal) and 160 degrees abduction (180 degrees normal) which was equal on the left and right shoulders. At the VA Compensation and...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00056
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicated “chronic right shoulder pain, status post distal clavicle excision, and pain rated as slight, not requiring daily narcotic therapy and frequent” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01145
Left shoulder instability, leftshoulder superior labral tear and left shoulder acromioclavicular(AC)joint degenerative arthritis were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated chronic pain with instability left shoulder, with superior labral tear, debrided and AC degenerative joint disease as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00131
The MEB forwarded right shoulder pain s/p arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded left ankle pain as medically acceptable.The PEBadjudicated the chronic right shoulder pain as unfitting, rated 0%with specified application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The left ankle pain condition was determined to meet retention standards and thereforewas...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00485
The PEB adjudicated the bilateral shoulder pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%; with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The Board considered the evidence of the service treatment record and MEB examination, as well as the C&P examination at the time of separation. In the matter of the left and right shoulder conditions and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a change in rating to 10% for the left shoulder condition and 10% for the...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01788
The Board must apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW VASRD rating guidelines. Strength and sensation was normal.MEB/PT ROM evaluation17 September 2003appears to document reduced left shoulder abduction of possibly 15 degrees but is illegible; the NARSUM noted the PT consultation as abduction 110 degrees.At the C&P exam the CI reported pain, decreased ROM, and difficulty with overhead motion. Service treatment...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02154
The shoulder and ankle conditions, characterized as “bilateral shoulder pain and chronic left ankle pain”, were the only two conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. However, although limitation of motion was non-compensable, Board members agreed that sufficient evidence of painful motion (VASRD §4.59) was present to support a 10% rating in each shoulder.There was no history of shoulder dislocations or of humerus malunion to support any rating under the...