10:
rROM:
SAf/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW 80ARI>
IS35COMM.'ND DR, £E WING, 31.Ul FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762·7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00
(EF-VZ)
Previous
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |
CASE NUMBER FD-2013-00517 |
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for A Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He states that he served his court martial sentence and the commander illegally punished him by recommending an administrative discharge after he returned to duty. The records indicated the applicant was convicted and sentenced by a Special Court Martial for failure to go to duty on time (2x), drove on divers occasions while driving privileges were suspended for six months, failed to possess current personal injury and property damage liability insurance on POV, with intent to deceive signed a false statement, driving while intoxicated, drunk on duty and left the scene of an accident without making identity know. Additionally, the applicant received one Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand, and one Letter of Counseling. This misconduct included received traffic tickets on three separate occasions and lost driving privileges for 30 days, involved in an altercation resulting in a |
|
| broken index finger and provided vague incomplete information to supervisors, knowingly falsely represented self as not used or experimented with marijuana prior to enlistment when in fact used marijuana 9-10 times prior to enlistment and caught for speeding, 100 KPH in a 60 KPH zone, and cited for reckless driving. IAW AFI 36-3208 administrative separation is not a disciplinary action or a form of punishment. Commanders and supervisors identify airman who shows likelihood for early separation. They make reasonable efforts to help these airman meet Air Force standards. Airmen who do not show a potential for further service should be discharged. The applicant was discharged IAW 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2, Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline. This includes conduct of a nature that tends to disrupt order, discipline, or morale within the military community. After a complete and thorough review of the records the Board found the applicant's contention to have no merit. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with th procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of th discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis £ upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged. Attachment: Examiner's Brief |
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00645
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSI'MIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEPERSONALAPPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADDRESSA. ORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSELMEMBERSITIINGGEN UOTHC OTHERDENYISSUES A94.SS INDEXNUMBERA67.SO •I 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTIIEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVJEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTlFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDmONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£ARJNCDATE CASENUMBER05Feb2014...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0316
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITI AL.) GRADE AFSN/SSAN is. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0316 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board felt member’s misconduct was a serious departure from the standards expected of airmen as evidenced by the fact the reason for his discharge was “conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline.” The Board could...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00265
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an ineqhity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge ISSUE: The applicant received a general discharge for conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline and cited three issues: Issue 1 : The applicant feels that the discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh considering the contribution he put forth toward the Air Force and his solid work ethic and performance in the...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00008
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD TYPE GEN NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL TO: SAF/MRBR Case heard in Washington, DC. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. ISSUE: Issue 1, The applicant was discharged IAW AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2: A Pattern of Misconduct: Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00360
AIR FORCE DlSCllARCE REVIEW BOARD ISIS COMMAND DR, EE WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10761-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMHKH FD-2006-003M) GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. The misconduct included driving without a license, failing to report to supervisor, misrepresenting himself as a senior noncommissioned officer and a...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00328
The records indicated he received two Articles 15, a Letter of Reprimand, and had an Unfavorable Information File. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00328 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD {Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. Reduction to AB, and 21 days extra duty... {No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 20 Jun 02, Luke AFB, AZ - Article 111.
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00338_13
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEAFSN/SSANADDRESS ANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOVNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHERxxA67.90 A93.07 lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPFARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGl:f.EARJNGDATE CASENVMBER19Juf2013...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0321
Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0321 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD agement, (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. The commander recommends separation from the Air Force with a general discharge and that probation and rehabilitation should not be offered. (atch 1b) Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00193_13
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableandtochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestsfortheupgradeofthedischarge,andtochangeofreasonandauthorityfor dischargearedenied. ISSUE: Applicant...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00255
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS APB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp-2994-00255 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Member received three Articles 15 and a Letter of Reprimand for misconduct. Member was age 19 to 23 when his.