Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00444_13
Original file (FD-2013-00444_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
GRADE    AFSNISSAN



X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF CO        EL

- --------- ----- - - -- --
- - ·-- ---





;•· I

HON
GEN      UOTHC
OTIIER   DENY
x x x x
x


1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITTONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HIWUNG DATE     CASE NllMB£il

05 Sep 2013      FD-2013-00444

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.









-     -        ---- - - -- -""''

-"' ;2,'<> "'st:;·.- -;. -:       :.. -   .,       ::. ·- •   .. ·      -        -- -
- -      . /''

TO:

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
FROM:

SECRETARY OPTIIEAIR PORCI: PltRSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR fORCE DISCHARC£ REVU:W BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, ££WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS APB, M.D 20'761-7'01


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00444

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Drug Abuse

Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The record indicated that the applicant pied guilty and was convicted of marijuana use under a special court martial and received an Article 15 for marijuana use three months after the court martial conviction. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. After review of the record, the board found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. Additionally, they found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his four years and 11 months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00685

    Original file (FD-2013-00685.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetogeneral.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,atAndrewsAFBon 20Mar2014.Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing: Exhibit#5:CollegeTranscriptsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:ApplicantreceivedanUnderOtherThanHonorableConditions (UOTHC)dischargeforMisconduct -Drug...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00461_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00461_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetogeneral.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00579

    Original file (FD-2013-00579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVI x JEFFREY T.HAWKINSADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONO•COUNSEL1780013THSTSTE108BEALECA93437 GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xA66.00 A92.21 IORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEW OFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO11IEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBERIOJan2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00486_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00486_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto(honorable)(general)(and)(tochangethe reason andauthorityforthedischarge),(and)(tochangethereenlistmentcode). Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00665

    Original file (FD-2013-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00444

    Original file (FD-2014-00444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00444

    Original file (FD-2008-00444.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The discharge is upgraded to Entry Level. However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s reason and authority for discharge inequitable. The DRB opined that the type of minor disciplinary infractions the applicant committed, along with the technical school washout, is the type of behavior we are looking for during the initial six months of service to determine whether to separate an individual under an Entry Level Separation.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00440_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00440_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicant appealsforupgrade ofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00314

    Original file (FD-2013-00314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeof thedischarge,tochangethereasonand...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00550_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00550_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMBEISSUES A94.53...