| ISSIJES A92.01 | INDEX NUMBER A66.00 | ||
| I | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD | ||
| 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE | ||
| 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION | ||
| 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE | ||
| COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD | |||
| ADDITIONAL EXHIBITSSUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE | |||
| TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING | |||
| HEARING DATE 02 Aug 2013 |
CASENUMB£R FD-2013-00248 |
||
| Case heard in Washington, D.C. Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request. |
|||
TO: SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742 |
SECRETARY OFTHIAIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DlsafARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535COMo\IAND DR. EE WING,3RD F\.OOR ANDREWS AFB,MD 20762-1001 |
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |
CASE NUMBER FD-2013-00248 |
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Drug Abuse Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The record indicates that the applicant pied guilty and was convicted by a special court martial for use of ecstasy. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his six years and 10 months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged. Attachment: Examiner's Brief |
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00486_13
GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto(honorable)(general)(and)(tochangethe reason andauthorityforthedischarge),(and)(tochangethereenlistmentcode). Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00160_13
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSAN x PERSONALAPPEARANCE NAME OFCOUNSELANDORORCANIL'ITJONRECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTHER DENY X*ISSUESAOl.57INDEX NUMBERA66.00X*1ORDERAPPOINTING THEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVCEW OF DISCHARGELEITEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00671
AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (lAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL INDEXNUMBER A66.00 GENUOTHCOTHER DENY x1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFOR REVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTER OF NOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER OSFeb2014FD-2013-00671CaseheardinWashington,...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00607_13
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00347_13
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Applicant receivedaGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseApplicant contendsdischargewasinequitablebecauseitwasbased...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00377_13
GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00335_13
GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00378_13
GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbythe applicant substantiates...
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00759
GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailable servicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.
AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00498
AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSAN x PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY A92.21•vv.001 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE 3 LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE...