Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00434
Original file (FD2006-00434.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
I 

..................... 
c...................: 
TYPY: GEN 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

NAMO OFCOIINSEL AND O R  ORCANIZA'I ION 

YES 

No 

I 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD 

. - - - - - - - - - - - - - I  

'..-.-.-....-.I 

RECORD REVIEW 

X 
ADDRESS AND O R  OHCAYlZATlON O F  COUNSEL 

ISbUOS 

A93.01 

I 

INDLX NUMRER 

A67.10 

I 

1 
2 
3 
4 

I 

I 

I 

I 

EXHIBITS SIJBMkTTIED TO THE BOARD 

ORDER APPOINTING  THE BOAKI) 
APP1,ICATION  FOR  REVIEW OF DISCHAKGF. 
LETI'W OF NOTIFICA'rTON 
BRIEF OF I'ERSONNEI.,  FII,E 
COUNSEL'S  RELEASE TO '1'1  IF. BOARD 
ADDI'I'IONAL  EXHIRI'IS S(JBMIT1'1~I) AT TIME OF 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

/  HEARING  DATE 
)  15 Mar 2007 
APPLICANT'S  ISSUE  4ND THB BOARD'S OEClSlONAl;  RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACtIED NR  FORCE DISCHAROE RBWIKW BOARD DEPlSlOIdht  IW'IONAI  E 

I  CASE NIIMBER 
I  FD-2006-00434 

I 
1 

I 
1 

I 

I 

I 

TAPE U C O R D M G  OF PfI

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00034

    Original file (FD2007-00034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had additional inisconduct and was administratively disciplined for financial irresponsibility, being late for work, missing a mental health appointment, and taking 30 Motrin with wine and drove a vehicle while impaired which caused an accident. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate, Issue 2. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00473

    Original file (FD2005-00473.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. A1C-(EPR Indicates): 16 Mar 93-15 Nov 94. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 8 May 96 for 4 yrs.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00138

    Original file (FD2004-00138.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's reason and authority for discharge improper. Character Statements and Certificate of Appreciation. TO: S A F r n R 550-C Street West, Suite 40 Randolph AFB, TX 78 150-4742 RE: APPL1CATION;FOR THE REVTEW OF DISCHARGE (RECORDS REVIEW) This is a request to review the discharge of th the current General Discharge to an Honorab supporting documentation that will reflect unstable mental health due to a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00190

    Original file (FD2003-00190.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AMN AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD MEMBER SITTING INDEX NUhIBER I A67.10 I I I I EXIIIBITS SUBMITFED TO TIE BOARD 1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 1 3 1 LETTER OF NOTlFICATION 4 - - - BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I I HEARING DATE 12 Sep...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00328

    Original file (FD2005-00328.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, based upon the record and evidence provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant's characterization of discharge inequitable. ISSUE: Applicant received a general discharge for misconduct - minor disciplinary infractions Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and the DRB concurred. Although the records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, four Letters of Reprimand, three k t t e r s of Counseling, four Records of Individual...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00011

    Original file (FD2003-00011.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0011 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Applicant's Rebuttal to Discharge w/20 Atchs. Attachments: Letter of Reprimand dated 30 Oct 96 .

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00246

    Original file (FD2005-00246.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by applicant substantiates an impropriety that would justify a change of discharge reason and authority. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 28 Jun 96, Ellsworth AFB, SD - Article 134. For your aotions, you w i v e d an LOR dated 1 Mar 96. f On 9 Feb 96, you reported late for duty.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00101

    Original file (FD2005-00101.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge is unsatisfying, and the nature of that title is due to my treatment while on active duty status. For this offense, you received an Article 15 dated 2 May 94, with punishment of 7 days extra duty and 7 days restriction to the limits of Sheppard AFB (Atch 1, Tab 1) b. of counseling (LOC) on 30 Aug 95 (Atch 6, Tab I).

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00022

    Original file (FD2005-00022.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling, a Letter from the commander, and a memorandum for Record for various acts of misconduct to include failure to follow directions by not reporting as directed, failing to return to duty station after being released from the medical center, failed to show for a scheduled appointment, failed to comply with military standards and for repeatedly violating a restraining order. CONCLUSIONS: The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00209

    Original file (FD2004-00209.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RANDOLPH AFB, TX :A :;b*;*< F KO.31: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00209 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members and the characterization of applicant's discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were its basis. On 2 Oct 93, yuu failed to go, you did not report to work at the prescribed time or place for...