1
1
I
I
1
NAIIE OF SERVICE MEMBER (IAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
JTYPE GEN
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
GRADE
1 AIC
I
I x
( ADDRESS AND OR OR(;ANILATION OF COllNSFl
RECORDREVIEW
I
I
I
MEMBER SITTING
VOTElOF THE BOARD
I
. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
ISSllES
A92.01
A94.05
INDEX NUMBER
A6
1 HEARING DATE
I 15 Mar 2007
AI'PI.ICANT+S ISSOB AND THE BOARD'S DFCISIONAI. UAnONlbLAHE DlWilS$ED ON THE ATTACHED NR FORCE DlR&&RGt REVIEW BOARD DKISIONAI, RA"TIONAI.F " '
I CASE NUMBER
FD-2006-00424
1 TAYR RECORDING OF PERSUNAI. APPMIIANCE HEARING
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
550 C STREET WkS 1'. SfJITE 40
RANDOLPH AFH, TX 78150-4742
ShCHETARL O F THE AIR FORCF. FERbONNEI, COllNClL
AIR FORLE UISCHARCE REVIOW HOARD
1535 COMMANU IIR. EE WING, 3RU bI OOR
ANDREWS A ~ H , MD 20762 7002
L
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN UO
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
".A
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2006-00424
GENEKAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
'The applicant was offered a personal appearancc before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertincnt data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUES:
Issue 1. The applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records
indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, four Letters of Reprimand, and one Memorandum for
Record for misconduct. The misconduct included iinancial irresponsibility on divers occasions and making
false official statements. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions. the applicant had ample
opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Ooard concluded the misconduct was a significant
departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by
the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Issue 2. Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things hc did while in the
service. Thc DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports
and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects
of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons
which were the basis for this case.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and silbstantive requirements of the dischargc regulation and was within the discretioil of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the ibregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AlC) (HGH SRA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF McChord AFB, WA on 28
Nov 95 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions).
Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 3 1 Jan 72. Enlmt Age: 18 7/12. Disch Age: 23 9/12. Educ: WS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-58, E-67, G-70, M-78. PAFSC: 2A651A - Aerospace Propulsion
Journeyman - Jet Engines. DAS: 14 Sep 93.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 05 Sep 90 - 04 Mar 91 (6 months) (Inactive).
das, all A M S . A m - Unknown. A1C - Unknown. SrA - 7 Mar 94. EPRS: 4 , 4 .
( 2 ) Enlisted as AB 5 Mar 91 for 4 years. Svd: 3 yrs 1 mo 6
3 .
SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenlisted as SrA 11 Apr 94 for 4 years. Svd: 01 Yrs 07 Mo 18 Das, all
AMS .
b. Grade Status: A1C - 6 Oct 95 (Vacation, 25 Oct 95)
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 25 Oct 95, Vacation, McChord AFB, WA - Article 107.
You, did, on or about 16 Oct 95. with intent to deceive.
make to T S g t ; .-.-.-.-.-..............
; an official statement, to
wit: that the checks to Citibank Visa in the amount of
$27.00 and Pizza Time in the amount of $25.00, were the
only outstanding checks you had in the system, which
statement was totally false, and was then known by you
to be so false. Reduction to A1C. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
(2) 6 Oct 95, McChord AFB, WA - Article 134. You, being
indebted to Army Air Force Exchange Service in the sum
of $68.90 for Deferred Payment Plan, which amount became
due and payable on or about 20 Sep 9 5 to 29 Sep 9 5 ,
dishonorably fail t o pay said debt. Suspended reduction
to AlC. Restriction to McChord AFB, WA for 45 days and
14 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR/UIF, 25 OCT 95 - Making several false official
statements.
MFR, 28 SEP 95 - Delinquent DPP account notice.
LOR/UIF, 07 AUG 95 - Financial irresponsibility.
LOR/UTF, 09 MAY 95 - Financial irresponsibility.
CR, 12 MAY 95 - Contined Financial irresponsibility.
LOR/UIF, 24 APR 95 - Finanacial irresponsibility.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 5 Jul 93 - 04 Jul 94 McChord AFB 4 (Annual)
5 Jul 94 - 12 May 95 McChord AFB 3 (CMDR DIR) REF
h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA, NDSM, AFOSLTR, AFLSAR, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (05) Yrs (02) Mos (24) Das
TAMS: (04) Yrs (08) Mos (24) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 27 Oct 06.
(Change Discharge to Honorable.)
Issue 1: I had completed my 4 year enlistment with good service. r feel
the punishment was harsch (sic) con?ering (sic) my good service.
ATCH
None.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
62D AIRLIFT WING (AMC)
MCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE, WASHINGTON 98438
MEMORANDUM FOR AlC b .,.,,..,.......-..-..-..-.pr..r..r....-..-..-..-.
: 62 MXS
....................................................
FROM: 62 MXSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for minor disciplinary
infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations,
and AFI 36-3208, Administmtive Separation of Airmen, under the provisions of paragraph 5.49.
If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or general. I
am recommending that your service be characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On or about 16 October 1995, you made a false official statement, with intent to deceive,
to a Noncommissioned Officer. For this offense, your previous Article 15 suspended sentence
was vacated effective 3 1 October 1995 which resulted in the reduction to the rank of Airman
First Class with a new date of rank of 6 October 1995, (atch l), and an entry into your
Unfavorable lnforrnation File (UIF). (atch 7)
b. Between on or about 29 September 1995 and 19 October 1995, you made several false
official statements with the intent to deceive. For these offenses, you received a Letter of
Reprimand dated 25 October 1995, (atch 2), and an entry into your UIF. (atch 7)
c. From on or about 21 September 1995 to on or about 29 September 1995, you dishonorably
failed to pay a just debt to the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES). For this
offense, you received nonjudicial punishment in the form of an Article 15 dated 10 October
1995, (atch 3), and an entry into your UIF. (atch 7).
d. On or about 29 June 1995, you uttered a check with insufficient funds to the Base
Exchange. For this offense, you received a Letter of Reprimand dated 7 August 1995, (atch 4),
and an entry into your UILF. (atch 7)
e. On or about 13 April 1995, you uttered a check with insufficient funds to the Base
Exchange. For this offense, you received a Letter of Reprimand dated 9 May 1995, (atch 5), and
an entry into your UIF. (atch 7)
f. On or about 21 April 1995, you failed to pay a just debt to the Northwest Connection, in
which your account was delinquent. For this offense, you received a Letter of Reprimand dated
24 April 1995, (atch 6), and an entry into your UJF. (atch 7)
3. Copics of the documents to be Fonvardcd to the separation authority in support of this
recomtnendation are attached, The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
autlzority will decide whether you are discharged or retained in the Air Force, and if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be i'neligible
for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to consult legal counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist
you. I have made an appointment for you to consult Capt :-----_---,
room 3076 on 13 NOV 95
own expense.
: 984-2240, in building 100,
, You may consult civilian counsel at your
----------
at 1330 h r s
5. You have the right to submit statements in
separation authority to consider must reach
an extension for good cause shown. I will
statements you want the
you request and receive
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to Physical Exams in
building 173 on 20 NOV 95
only) for 12 hours prior, no alcohol 72 hours prior, no tobacco products 6 hours prior to
examination, bring eyeglasses and contact solution if using contacts, and you must be in uniform
for the examination.
at 1500 hrs with your medical records. Fast (drink water
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at your Squadron Orderly Room.
Commander
Attachments:
1. AF Form 366 dated 3 1 October 1995 wlatchs
2. Letter of Reprimand dated 25 October 1995 wlatchs
3. AF Form 3070 dated 10 October 1995 wlatchs
4. Letter of Reprimand dated 7 August 1995 wlatchs
5. Letter of Reprimand dated 9 May 1995 wlatchs
6 . Letter of Reprimand dated 24 April 1995 wlatchs
7. M F o m 1137
8. Airman's Receipt of Notification Memoranduin
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00016
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I I MEMBER SITTING HON I WTE agars, eogga GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY ................................. ISSUES A94.53 1NIIF.X NllMBEH A67.10 I HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER X EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO '(m BOARD I 1 I ORDER APPOINTINGTHE BOARD 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 2 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 1 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAI, EX1...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00022
The records indicated the applicant received two Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling, a Letter from the commander, and a memorandum for Record for various acts of misconduct to include failure to follow directions by not reporting as directed, failing to return to duty station after being released from the medical center, failed to show for a scheduled appointment, failed to comply with military standards and for repeatedly violating a restraining order. CONCLUSIONS: The...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0545
Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 21 Nov 84 - 11 Apr 85 (4 months 22 days) (Inactive). However, the Board is not required to respond in writing to issues of concem to you unless those issues are listed or incorporated by specific reference below. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00006
In reviewing the evidence presented, I find there exists a legally sufficient basis to warrant separating -from the Air Force. Clearly and should be discharged. d. On or about 13 October 1994, you wrote a check to the Moody AFB Exchange in the amount of about $50.00, and thereafter, failed to place or maintain sufficient knds in your account to pay this check in full upon its presentment for payment.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00034
He had additional inisconduct and was administratively disciplined for financial irresponsibility, being late for work, missing a mental health appointment, and taking 30 Motrin with wine and drove a vehicle while impaired which caused an accident. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate, Issue 2. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00187
Applicant received an Article 15 for failure to go to appointed place of duty and making a false official statement. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached, The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction ox higher 'authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and if you are discharged, how...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00081
(EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0081 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. For your actions, you received a LOR on 19 February 1999 (Atch 6).
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0386
{| CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0386 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, a change in the Reason and Authority for the discharge, and to the RE Code. Under Air Force regulations if the separation authority does not | accept a conditional waiver of the discharge board, he can either return the case to the installation to be heard by a discharge board or can request and unconditional waiver of the board. In this...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00053
mere AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA | ee PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL NONE MEMBERS SITTING ea ISSUES INDEX NUMBER f iS ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.11, A94.05, A94.53 447.00 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE 03-05-28 CASE NUMBER FD2003-00053 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0448
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0448 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant received three Article 15s, two Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, one Letter of Admonishment, and two Records of Individual Counseling for financial irresponsibility, failure to obey, failure to go, and traffic, parking and speeding violations. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0448 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR...