AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
ISSUES AO1.OO
A95.00
INDEX NUMBER
A61.00
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBEK
07 Jul2006
z m & n ~ ~ ~
I
FD-2005-00367
~ D I
S
~ A T
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
X
X
1
2
3
4
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO TIIE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE HOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF 01: PERSONNEL FILE
COIINSt1,'S KhLEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SURMITTFD A T TIMF OF
PERSONAL, APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAI. Al)l)t,AKANC't:
T A C ~ @ ~
AIR PORCE DISCHARGE RbVIPW BOAKU DECISIONAL RATfONALE
I
I
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
- --
?~rc~z&-o: REFP~E?
- - .A!.. i. A.. -. . -. .R. -. . . . -dim.-
-. . -. .I.S!S#.ATPPIOFBP-@
n
PR*..
DENT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;
"
/
. -.
SAFIMRRR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
SECRETARY OF TllE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL I:OLINCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DK, EE WING,3KU KLOOH
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NlJMBER
FD~2005~00367
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DKB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE:
Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was for one isolated incident. The records indicated the applicant
received an Article 15, a civilian conviction and three Letters of Counseling for misconduct. The Article 15
stated the applicant was disorderly which conduct was prejudice to good order and discipline in the armed
forces. She was convicted of theft in the second degree by civilian authorities resulting in a court suspended
imposition of sentence pursuant to a plea agreement. The plea agreement resulted in applicant being placed
on probation for 24 months. The applicant was also cited on three separate occasions for traffic violations
resulting in the receipt of Letters of Counseling. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions,
the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Board concluded the
misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization
of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Issue 2. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, no
inequity or impropriety in her discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. 'The Board
concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized her term of service.
Issue 3. The applicant stated she was told her discharge would automatically be upgraded after 5 years of
discharge. While a discharge may be upgraded, the upgrade is by no means automatic. A discharge is
upgraded only if the applicant and the DRB can establish an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of
discharge. In this case, none was found, so the Board denied the appeal.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
.............................................
(Former SRA) (HGH SRA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a UOTH Disch fr Elmendorf AFB, AK on 11 Mar
97 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.51 (Misconduct - Civilian Conviction). Appeals for
Honorable Discharge,
2 . BACKGROUND :
a. DOB: 26 Apr 72. Enlmt Age: 19 7/12. Disch Age: 24 1.0/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-92, E-74, G-78, M-54. PAFSC: 4T052 - Histopathology Journeyman.
DAS: 10 Sun 94.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 5 Dec 91 - 11 Dec 91. ( 7 days) (~nactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 12 Dec 91 for 6 yrs. Svd: 05 Yrs 02 Mo 28 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: SrA - 29 Aug 94
A1C - 29 Jan 92
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15,s: (1) 30 Nov 93, Keesler AFB, MS - Article 134. You, were,
on or about 28 Sep 93, disorderly, which conduct was to
the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed
forces. Suspended reduction to Airman. Twenty one days
extra duty, (No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: Civilian Conviction, 18 DEC 96 - Convicted of theft in the
second degree in District
Court for the State of
Alaska at Anchorage.
LOCI UNDATED - Traffic ticket for speeding.
LOC, 19 APR 95 - Traffic ticket for speeding.
LOCI 10 MAR 95 - Traffic ticket for failing to report an
accident within 48 hours.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 12 Dec 91 - 11 Aug 93 Keesler AFB
12 Aug 93 - 12 Apr 94 Keesler AFB
13 Apr 94 - 12 Apr 95 Elmendorf AFB 4 (Annual)
13 Apr 95 - 12 Apr 95 Elmendorf AFB 4 (Annual)
3 (Initial)
4 (CRO)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA W/2 OLCS, AFGCM, AFLSAR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (05) Yrs (03) Mos (06) Das
TAMS: (05) Yrs (02) Mos (28) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Frn 293) dtd 13 Sep 0 5 .
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
la. CQNTlWAT10N OF ITEM 6, ISSUES (N app#ouk}
k
~
~ H M bewb d ~ & ~ w A
-lbr kn ycbd S N Z ; ~ ~
;fi Jk?
Arc WCZL /Sr SZ /kun/hg. 7 h r ~ U J ~ J am i s o / d ~ m ~
/ c s ~ i / m C ;,-I a n @ c . a A b / ~ dr%&~/gc -
+bF "
4 ;
4
flf 4 h 6
3 a m ajk;Ij &r your ~ n r r @ n r / 2 n
~ m n b W ~ , C C
an
; S (r on4 4;;iYr bp9-J
dr'gch~lyrd. 3-f rndrrd 3
d d u t f f
~
00 # / a c d a d ~ @ $ obft?,n, v W arnmcndtd 00214.
18. CONTINUATION OF ITEM 8, SUPPORflNCI DOCUMENTS
gfi ~u C-4 $ r l
/OCO/ V A h = ~ ~ r p e ~ ~ d
r y e o l ~ oC&4A9
* ~ t ~ f i o h i
p
,.J auhina*i
r w , L i s apprcuhbd-
/if mpp/lcah/b)
~ ~ , $ m b n e v~
, n c i & / r ~
MAIL COMPLETED APPLICATIONS TO APPROPRIATE ADDRESS BELOW.
ARMY
Army Revlew Boards Agenay
Support Dlvldon, SK. Louis
9700 Pnge Avenue
St. LOUIS, MO 63132-6200
(Sam http://arba.amy.pantagon.mll)
AIR FORCE
Air Forca Asvisw Boards Aamncy
SAF/MABR
550-C Street Wmt, Suite 40
Randolph AFB. TX 78 1504742
I
DD FORM 293. MAR 2004
I
I
NAVY AND MARINE CORPS
Naval Councll of Peraonnel Boerde
720 Kernon Straat. S.E.
Room 309 (NDRB)
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-6023
COAST GUARD
U.S. Coast Ouard
Comrnandnnt (G-WPM)
2100 Seoond Strmet, S.W. Room 5500
Washington, DC 20593
Page 2 ot 4 Pages J
DEPARTMENT OFtTHE AJR FORCE
PACIFIC AIR FORCES
MEMORANDUM FOR 3 MDSSISGSAH ( S M ;
FROM 3 MDSSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum--Board Hearing
,..-..-..-..-..-.-"-I
.....................
9
e 1 Jlus tost
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, and
specifically for civilian conviction. The authority for thls action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208,
under the provisions of paragraph 5.5 1. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation
authority to support this recommendation are attached,
2. My reasons for this action are:
On or about 18 Dec 96, you were adjudged guilty of theft in the second degree for stealing
approximately $8,832.43 in cash, while employed at J.C Penney, as evidenced by a judgment, from the
District Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage, case # 3AN-S96-6806CR, dated 18 Dec 96.
3. This action could result in your separation with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
Discharge. I am recommending you receive an Under Other Than Honorable Concbtions Discharge
The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authority wiU make the final decision in h s
be ineligible for reenlistment in the A r Force and will probably
matter. If you are discharged, you d l
be denied enlistment in any component of the armed forces and any special pay, bonus, or education
assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.
4. You have the right to:
EL Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board,
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board hearing.
e. Waive the above rights, You must consult legal counsel before making a decision to waive any
of your rights.
5. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the 3rd Aerospace
Medcine Squadron, Building 24-850 at 0715 on 6 F* 6 9 9 with your rneQcal records. You
are to fast (drink water only) for 14 hours, refrain from alcohol 72 hours, and refrain from the use of
tobacco products 6 hours prior to examination, bring eyeglasses (and contact solution if using contacts)
ifapplicable. You must be in uniform for the examination.
6. Mditary legd c-qouns~ll h-as been obtained to assist-you. A,~I appointment has been scheduled for you
: 552-3887, at Bldg 6-920, rm 330 on 4 1-4 77 at or30 .
to consult Capi ,..-..-..-..-?
Instead of the appointed cornel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the actwe
military service and is reasonably available as determined acmrding to AFI 5 1-20 1. In addition to
military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay expenses
incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if employed, must be readily
available.
7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, w i h seven workdays, specrfying the rights you
choose to exercise. The statement must be signed in the presence of your counsel who also will sign it.
If you waive your right to a hearing before an admuusaative &scharge board, you may submit written
statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the discharge authority with the case file to
be considered with this recommendation. If you fail to respond, your failure will constitute a waiver of
the right to the board hearing.
8. You have been scheduled for a Transition Assistance Program briefing. You must report to the
. You have also been scheduled for a
Family Support Center at
TMO Household Gwds Shprnent preprocessing briehg, You must report to bldg 2-900 (People
Center), rm 247 at
lul . on 4 F 6 4 3
(YY
lqOo b . on 5-
7 7
9. Any personal mformation you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy of
AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at your Squadron Orderly Room.
10. If you request a board and you fail to appear without good cause, your failure to appear constitutes
a waiver of your right to be present at the hearing.
1 1. The hscharge board or the discharge authority will make the h d h g and recommendations
required under 10 U.S.C. 2005(g).
12. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Commander
Attachments:
1. Article 15,3 Dec 93
2. LOC, undated
3. LOC, 10 Mar 95
4. LOC, 19 Apr 95
5. lMWRF Ltr, 28 Nov 95
6, Judgment Case # 3AN-S96-6806CR, 18 Dec 96
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00101
(Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My discharge is unsatisfying, and the nature of that title is due to my treatment while on active duty status. For this offense, you received an Article 15 dated 2 May 94, with punishment of 7 days extra duty and 7 days restriction to the limits of Sheppard AFB (Atch 1, Tab 1) b. of counseling (LOC) on 30 Aug 95 (Atch 6, Tab I).
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0421
The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for minor disciplinary infractions after 2 years, 3 months and 16 days of service. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process, In view of the foregoing findings the...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00158
L-.-- EXIllBlTS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I 1 - -- --I ORDER APPOM7MCi 'I'HE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE "." Room 5500 Washington, DC 20593 DD FORM 293, AUG 2003 Page 2 of 4 Pages I3EPARTMENT OF THE AJR FORCE 377th Security Police Squadron (AFMC) 2 Jan 96 FROM: 377 SPSICC SUBJECT: Notification Letter -- Board Hearing I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of misconduct. As a result, you received a Letter of Counseling, dated 3 1 Jan 95. b.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0448
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0448 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant received three Article 15s, two Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, one Letter of Admonishment, and two Records of Individual Counseling for financial irresponsibility, failure to obey, failure to go, and traffic, parking and speeding violations. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0448 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00080
LOC, 20 MAR 00 - Speeding. You have been scheduled for medical examinations. Commander Attachments: AF Form 3070, 27 Mar 02 AF Form 1137 MER, 6 Mar 02 LOC, 19 Feb 02 LOC, 13 Feb 02 LOR, 26 Mar 01 DD Form 1408, 2 Sep 00 LOC, 20 Mar 00 .
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00154
PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW ROARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDIUWS ATB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE m V I E W BOA KI) DECISIONAL RAIIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2004-00154 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of thc discharge regulation and was within the...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00255
You, who knew or should have known of your duties, on or about 20 Jul 03, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 years, as it was your duty to do. For this failure to inform your superiors of the damage, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 27 Aug 02 (Attachment 9). For this dereliction of duty, you received an AF Form 174, Record of Individual...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00308
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NllMRFR FD-2006-00308 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. SGQF LTR, 25 OCT 91 - Returned check notification.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00209
RANDOLPH AFB, TX :A :;b*;*< F KO.31: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00209 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members and the characterization of applicant's discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were its basis. On 2 Oct 93, yuu failed to go, you did not report to work at the prescribed time or place for...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00016
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I I MEMBER SITTING HON I WTE agars, eogga GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY ................................. ISSUES A94.53 1NIIF.X NllMBEH A67.10 I HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER X EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO '(m BOARD I 1 I ORDER APPOINTINGTHE BOARD 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 2 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 1 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAI, EX1...