Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00177
Original file (FD2005-00177.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
I 

I 
1 

- 

-" 

I 
I 

I 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW  HOARD HEARING RECORD 

(LAW, FIKSI' MIDDLE IN I'I'I,\L) 

1  i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ;  
TYPE GEN 

I 

I 

'  MqHikL  .  j  NAME b F  COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

J X   I 

I 

I 

RECORDREVIEW 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZA I ION OF COUNSEL 

I 

I 

MEMBER SITTING 

HON 

" 

I 

VOTE OF THE BOARD 

GEN 

""THC 

-  0 l 116- 

2 
3 
4 

APPLICATION  FOR  REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 
LETTER OF NOTIFICA'I'ION 
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL.. F I I X  
COUNSF.I.,'S KELEASE TO THE HOARD 
ADDITIONAL, EXHIUI'T'S SUBMITTED AT 'I'IMB OF 
PERSONAL APPEARANCE 

TAPE KECORDNG  OF PERSONAL APIJEARAN('E 

HEARING U.KIE 

1  10 Mar 2006 

1  FD-2005-00177 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

APPICANI"$  ($SUE AND 1 HE~~ARD'SDECEGIQNAL RATION&  ARE DlSrlJSSkD ON TKE ATTACHED AIR  FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL l

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00458

    Original file (FD2006-00458.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. (No appeal) (No mitigation) 26 Jul 01, RAF Lakenheath, UK - Article 121.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00033

    Original file (FD2006-00033.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Vacation action was for failure to go to appointed place of duty. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A ~ C ) 1. At or near RAF Lakenheath, UK, on or about 3 Feb 04 you did, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty and received the same as in paragraph 2k; m. At or near Sheppard Air Force Base, TX, on or about 1 1 Jul03 you were disorderly while on duty and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00142

    Original file (FD2004-00142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE I NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUhIBER I A67.90 I . The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15 for dereliction of duty and for causing a disturbance in complete view of the public by swearing at and striking an NCO and resisting apprehension, one Letter of Reprimand for inappropriate behavior and disrespect of authority, and one Letter of Admonishment for dereliction of duty. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00121

    Original file (FD2004-00121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and two Letters of Reprimand. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Letter of Reprimand, dtd 2 Jan 03 c. Letter of Reprimand, dtd 26 Jan 02

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2005-00317

    Original file (FD2005-00317.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, thc applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appcarance bcfore the Board. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that thc applicant was provided full administrative due process. I (2) 4 Nov 02, RAF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00373

    Original file (FD2005-00373.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00373 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military mcmbers, and the characterization of thc discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate; however, if he can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issue, he should consider exercising his right to make a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00175

    Original file (FD2003-00175.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For this you received a Letter of Counseling, dated 4 March 2000 (Attachment 10). For this, you received a Letter of Counseling dated 13 March 2000 (Attachment 1 1). Record of Individual Counseling, dated 22 February 2000 10.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00322

    Original file (FD2006-00322.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    'I'X 781 50-4742 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW HOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING.3HIl YI.OOR ANUHKWS AFH, MI) 211761-711112 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edilio~i will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NllMBtiH FD-2006-00322 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Applicant's Issues. For this misconduct and subparagraph "h" below,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00327

    Original file (FD2005-00327.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I GRADE NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) . ISSUE: The record indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for misconduct. d. Art 15's: (1) 26 Mar 04, RAF Croughton, UK - Article 81.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00272

    Original file (FD2003-00272.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - 7 I DENY ( INDEX NUMBER A49.00 A67.90 HEARING DATE 28 Oct 2003 CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00272 I I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. X ; a ~ p I ORDER APPOMTMG THE BOARD APPLlCATlON FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE I;:,%.. 1 2 3 1 LETTER OF NOTlFlCATlON 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ~ @ ~ ~ J @ Q ~ %@ ~ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE I APWCANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISiONM RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE...