AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
I'
-
MEMBER SITTING
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
WEST, SUITE 40
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2005-00151
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant does not contest his discharge. He wants an upgrade due to the fact that he is now a law
abiding citizen of good character; is honest and cares for his community; and is a hard worker and loves and
supports his family. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, five Letters of Reprimand,
five Records of Individual Counseling and one Letter of Admonition for various acts of misconduct to
include cheating on an assignment during formal training in Airman Leadership School; being late for work
on several occasions; dereliction of duty on several occasions; and for failure to follow instructions. The
DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his
negative behavior. In addition, the Board reviewed the applicant's medical records and noted that he was
evaluated by a Medical Evaluation Board but was subsequently returned to duty. While the applicant was
assigned duties outside of his AFSC, the applicant did not contend his medical condition adversely impacted
either the quality of his service or his capability to serve. The Board considered this issue independent of the
applicant's contentions, concluding his medical condition did not contribute to his misconduct, and finding
this issue did not substantiate an inequity or impropriety. The Board concluded the misconduct was a
significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge
received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH SrA)
1. MATTER UNDER M I E W : Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Holloman AFB, NM on 11 Jul 02
UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50.1 (Pattern of Misconduct - Discreditable Involvement
With Military Authorities). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 20 Dec 74. Enlmt Age: 18 6/12. Disch Age: 27 6/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-71, E-53, G-44, M-52. PAFSC: 2A753 - Aircraft Structural
Maintenance. DAS: 6 Sep 98.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 22 Jul 93 - 27 Jan 94 (6 months 9 days)(~nactive).
(2) Enlisted as AB 28 Jan 94 for 4 yrs. Extended 1 Mar 96
for 8 months. Svd: 3 yrs 7 months 5 days, all AMS. A1C - 28 May 95. SrA - 28
Jan 97. EPRs: 3, 4, 5.
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenlisted as SrA 3 Sep 97 for 5 yrs. Svd: 4 Yrs 10 Mo 8 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - 28 Feb 02 (Article 15, 28 Feb 02)
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 28 Feb 02, Holloman AFB, NM - Article 92. You, who
knew or should have known of your duties, on or about 5
Feb 02 and 6 Feb 02, were derelict in the performance of
those duties in that you negligently failed to properly
maintain shelf life items, as it was your duty to do.
Reduction to AlC, forfeiture of $150.00 pay per month
for 2 months, and a reprimand. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)
e. Additional:'LOR/UIF, 13 SEP 01 - Late for duty on three separate
occasions.
LOR, 20 AUG 01 - Dereliction of duty.
LOA, 05 JUL 01 - Dereliction of duty.
RIC, 20 JUN 01 - Dereliction of duty.
RIC, 30 MAY 01 - Dereliction of duty.
LOR, 07 DEC 00 - Speeding.
LOR, 21 AUG 00 - Speeding.
RIC, 13 OCT 99 - Failure to follow instructions.
RIC, 10 AUG 99 - Late for work.
LOR, 21 MAY 99 - Cheating on an assignment during formal
training of Airman Leadership School.
RIC, 11 FEB 99 - Late for work.
f . CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 14 Jul 97 - 13 Jul 98 Yokota AB
4 (Annual)
14 Jul 98 - 13 Jul 99 Holloman AFB 2 (Annua1)REF
14 Jul 99 - 13 Jul 00 Holloman AFB 3 (Annua1)REF
14 Jul 00 - 13 Jul 01 Holloman AFB 3 (Annua1)REF
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NCOPMER, AFLSAR W/BOLC, AFOSLTR, NDSM W/BS,
AFGCM, AFOUA W/2 BOLCS, AFAM.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (8) Yrs (11) Mos (20) Das
TAMS: (5) Yrs (8) Mos (14) Das
4 . RASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 4 Apr 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: Person requesting upgrade and or change of discharge is a law
abiding citizen of good character.
Issue 2: Person requesting upgrade and or change of discharge is honest and
cares for his community.
Issue 3: Person requesting upgrade and or change of discharge is a hard
worker, loves and supports his family.
ATCH
1. Character Reference.
2. Record of Individual Counseling, 3 May 01.
3. Certificate of Recognition.
4. Fifteen Letters of Appreciation.
5. Fifteen Certificates of Appreciation.
JEPARTMENT OF THE AIR F O R d
(
HEADQUARTERS 49TH flGHTER WING (ACC)
HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE, NEW MEXICO
F 0 2m-5--m/5[
HAY 2 9 :26M
MEMORANDUM FOR A1
FROM: 8 FS/CC
SUBJECT: Letter of Notification--Board Hearing
-
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of
misconduct, discreditable involvement with military authorities. The authority for this action is
AFI 36-3208, Section'H, paragraph 5.50.1. If my recommendation is approved, your service will
be characterized with either as honorable, as under honorable conditions (general) or as under
other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. I am recommending that you receive an
under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge.
2. My reasons for this action are as follows:
a. You, did, at or near Holloman h r Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 11 February
1999, without authority, fail to go at.the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty. For
your misconduct, you received a Letter of Counseling on 11 February 1999. (Atch 1)
b. You, did, at or near Holloman Au Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 11 May
1999, cheat on your assignment during at Airman Leadership School. For your misconduct, you
received a Letter of Reprimand on 2 1 May 1999. (Atch 2)
c. You, did, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 9 August
1999, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of d ~ ~ t y . For
your misconduct, you received a Letter of Counseling on 10 August 1999. (Atch 3)
-
d. You were, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on
r
1999, derelict in your duties, in that you failed to follow instructions fiom SS
You were instructed to go out to aircraft 787 to work on the left and right inboard torque beams,
and also the right upper platty area per T.O. 3-3. You failed to do this. For your misconduct, you
received a Letter of Counseling on 13 October 1999. (Atch 4)
e. You, did, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 19 July 2000,
unlawfully drive 35 mph in a 25 mph speed zone. For your misconduct, you received a Letter of
Reprimand on 2 1 August 2000. (Atch 5)
f. You, did, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 5 December
2000, unlawhlly drive 38 mph in a 30 mph speed zone. For your misconduct, you received a
Letter of Reprimand on 7 December 2000. (Atch 6)
g. You were, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 29 May
2001, derelict in the performance of your duties. You were assigned to escort approximately 20
contractors and left your assigned duty to talk with your fiiends. For your misconduct, you
received a Letter of Counseling on 30 May 2001. (Atch 7)
h. You were, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on divers occasions
during the month of June 2001, derelict in your duties in that you failed to meet T.O.
specifications. On 1 June 2001, your improper lay-up on a DLIR panel resulted in verbal
counseling. On 1 1 June 2001, you failed to properly install material on a doghouse panel - this
resulted in a Letter of Counseling dated 1 1 June 2001. (Atch 8). On 26 June 2001, two failed
QVIs on left and right T-Ducts, did not meet T.O. specifications. For your misconduct, you
received a Letter of Admonishment on 5 July 200 1. (Atch 9)
i. You were, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 1 August
to perform maintenance according to techcal
at your assessment sheet aircraft 82-0787 had 14.5
w hours. The aircraft had in fact, closer to 35 hours.
2001, derelict in your dutie
data. You reported to TSgt
RAM hours and implied tha
You failed to perfom maintenance according to technical data despite proper training and
counseling. Two days later, you left your duty location to take lunch without permission. For
your misconduct, you received a Letter of Reprimand on 20 August 2001. (Atch 10)
j. You, did, at or near Holloman Air Force, New Mexico, on divers occasions between 8
August 2001 and on or about 12 September 2001, without authority, fail to go at the time
prescribed to your appointed place of duty. For your misconduct, you received a Letter of
Reprimand with a corresponding UIF action on 13 September 2001. (Atch 11)
k. You, who h e w or should have lrnown of your duties at or near Holloman Air Force
Base, New Mexico, on or about 5 February 2002 and 6 February 2002, were derelict in the
performance of those duties in that you negligently failed to properly maintain shelf life items, as
it was your duty to do so. For your misconduct, you received nonjudicial punishment with a
corresponding UIF action on 28 February 2002. (Atch 12)
3. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable conditions
(UOTHC) discharge. I am recommending that you receive an under other than honorable
conditions (UOTHC) discharge. The commander exercising Special Court-Martial jurisdiction or
a higher authority will make the final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will be
ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied enlistment in any
component of the armed forces and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be
subjected to recoupment.
You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements on your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board hearing.
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making a decision to
waive any of your rights.
4. You have the right to consult counsel. Mil
I have arranged an appointment for you to con
s on L!I 0 May 2002.
Counsel, Building 222;Holloman AFB, phone
Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active
military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201. In addition
to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay
expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if employed, must be
readily available.
ained to assist you.
Area Defense
5. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays, specifying the rights you
choose to exercise. The statement must be signed in the presence of your counsel who also will
sign it. If you waive your right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, you may
submit written statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the discharge
authority with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If you fail to respond,
your failure will constitute a waiver of the right to the board hearing.
6. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to Family Practice
Clinic, Bldg 15, at 08
May 2002 for the examination.
hrs on
7. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the office of the Area Defense Counsel.
8. If you request a board hearing and you fail to appear without good cause, your failure to
appear constitutes a waiver of your right to be present at the hearing.
9. The discharge board or the discharge authority will make the findings and recommendations
required under 10 U.S .C. 2005(g).
10. You must execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately. The
acknowledgment does not admit or deny any of the allegations against you, nor does it mean that
you agree with the discharge action. It is simply an acknowledgment that you have received this
Letter of Notification.
Lt Col, USAF
Attachments:
1. Letter of Counseling, 1 1 February 1999
2. Letter of Reprimand, 2 1 May 1999
3. Letter of Counseling, 10 August 1999
' 4. Letter of Counseling, 13 October 1999
5. Letter of Reprimand, 2 1 August 2000
6. Letter of Reprimand, 7 December 2000
7. Letter of Counseling, 30 May 2001
8. Letter of Counseling, 20 June 2001
9. Letter of Admonishment, 5 July 2001
10. Letter of Reprimand, 20 August 2001
1 1. Letter of Reprimand w/LTIF, 13 September 2001
12. Arhcle 15 w/UIF, 28 February 2002
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00031
Attachment: Examiner's Brief - DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH SRA) 1. For this misconduct, you received an RIC, dated 21 Mar 03, (Atch 10) (I) You, did, on or about 23 Sep 02, without authority, absent yourself fiom your place of duty at which you were required to be, to wit: 49th Civil Engineering Squadron, located at Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, and did remain so absent until on or about 23 Sep 02. You are ordered to...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0515
The record indicates the applicant received three Article 15s, a Vacation action on a suspended UCM] offense, five Letters of Reprimand, and a Letler of Counseling for failure to pay just debts, failure to go, giving false statement, dereliction of duty and for being AWOL. 4, EVIDENCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT: This discharge recommendation is based on the following documented acts of misconduct: a. Respondent did, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, on or about 16 December 1998, at MC...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00280
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, seven Letters of Reprimand, and a Letter of Counseling for misconduct. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. (Atch 5) an order which it was your duty to obey, did at or near ------------ - 3 t - - - - - - - - - f. You, being indebted to Otero Federal Credit Union in the excess of $1300 for monthly payment of a car loan, which amount became...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00114
SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 24 Jan 01 for 6 yrs. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Frn 293) dtd 8 Mar 05 (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF ATCH 1. Applicant's Issues To Whom It May Concern: I would like to submit this letter as a reason for why my Discharge should be changed 6om a General under Honorable Conditions lo an Honorable discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00284
For this misconduct, you received an Article 15 dated 20 Jan 05 (Atch 1) b. (Atch 7) h. You, did at or near Holloman AFB NM, on or about 3 Sep 03, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: Family Support Center For this misconduct, you received a Lctter of Admonishment (LOA) dated 3 Sep 03. You, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by TSgt 49 A M X S , to obtain your government drivers license and your flightline competency card by...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00209
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: I am requesting an upgrade in order to rejoin the military (Air Force). My reasons for this action are as follows: You did, at or near Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico, between on or about 1 March 2003 and on or about 3 1 May 2003, wrongfully use marijuana.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00215
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ....................................... (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. MEMORANDUM FOR DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD SUBJECT: DISCHARGE UPGRADE 1, On November 17,2005, I was separated from active duty in the Air Force with a General, Under Honorable Conditions, Discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00203
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00203 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The record indicates the applicant received six Records of Individual Counseling for being late for work--three times, failure to obey direct order, failure to meet standards, and abuse of government vehicle; four Letters of Reprimand for being late for work and failure to go; and an Article 15 for driving under the influence of alcohol and...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00350
ISSUE: Applicant does not contest his discharge. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Suspended reduction to Airman, and 14 days extra duty.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00383
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NLIMBhR FD-2005-00383 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a vacation, two Letters of Reprimand (LOR'S), Unfavorable Information File, two Records of Individual Coullseling (RIC's), dishonored check notification and an arrest for misconduct. Your actions are a violation of Article 92, for which you received a Letter of Reprimand...