Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00471
Original file (FD2004-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
+ AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

amines AIC ie
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
P 2 COUNSEL. 2] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ) ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL,
YES
Xx
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
x
K
x
x
SSUES 494.06 INDEX NUMBER 4 6 1) ine LO SU BL J A Oe EE
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
| 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
| 4 ) BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
02 Jun 2005 FB-2004-00471

 

 

    

 

ONAL: RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED.ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW: BOARD DECISIONAL RATION

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

 

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
: . AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2004-00471

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority
for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this night.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: The Board grants partial relief. The discharge is upgraded to Honorable. The reason and
authority for the discharge and the reenlistment code will not change.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by applicant substantiates an
impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. However, based upon the record and evidence
provided by applicant, the Board finds the applicant’s discharge inequitable.

ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because she had mental and medical issues that were
not taken into account at the time of her discharge. The records indicated the applicant received an Article
15 for failure to go, a Vacation action under the UCM for stealing a pack of cigarettes from the AAFES,
one Letter of Reprimand and five Letters of Counseling for various misconduct, three of which were being
late for duty. While the Board does not condone the member’s theft of cigarettes, a more serious offense, the
Board noted sufficient evidence that raised a possible mitigating relationship between the applicant’s four
instances of arriving late for duty, to include her failure to go at the prescribed time to her place of duty, and
resulting in non-judicial punishment. The record clearly shows documented medical issues which may have
had an impact in her actions. When considering the totality of the member’s military service, to include her
three years of enlistment during which she demonstrated solid duty performance and an absence of
musconduct, the Board concluded offering relief in favor of the applicant is appropriate in this case.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that the overall quality of

applicant’s service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge under the provisions of Title 10,
USC 1553.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2004-00471
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

niga: (Former AlC) (HGH SRA)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disech fr Seymour Johnson, NC on 7 Peb
O03 UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions) .

Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge.

2. BACKGROUND:

a.
AFOT: N/A.

DOB: 29 Jan 74. Enlmt Age: 25 4/12. Disch Age: 29 0/12 . Educ: HS DIPL.

A-83, E-59, G-44, M-45. PAFSC: 1C44C - Jet Engine Propulsion.

DAS: 14 Nov 99.

b.

Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 29 Jan 99 - 25 May 99 (3 months 29 days) (Inactive) .

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a.

b.

Enlisted as AB 26 May 99 for 6 yrs. Svd: 3 Yrs 8 Mo 13 Das, all AMS.

Grade Status: AIC - 15 Jan 03 (Vacation of Article 15, 15 Jan 03)
SrA - 9 Nov O01

AlC - 9 Jul 99

Time Lost: None.

Art 15’s: (1) 15 Jan 03, Vacation, Seymour Johnson AFB, NC - Article
121. You, did, on or about 31 Dec 02, steal a pack of
cigarettes of a value of $2.90, the property of Army and
Air Force Exchange Service. Reduction to Al1C.

(No appeal) (No mitigation)

{2) 18 Dec 02, Seymour Johnson AFB, NC - Article 86. You
did, on or about 19 Nov 02, without authority, fail to
go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of
duty. Suspended reduction to AlC. Forfeiture of

9150.00 pay per month for 2 months. (No appeal} (No
mitigation)

Additional: LOR, 04 JUN 02 - Late for duty.
LOC, 28 MAY 02 - Late for duty.
LOC, 02 MAR 02 - Dereliction of duty.

LOC, 08 JAN 02 - Noncompliance to Dress & Appearance
standards.
LOC, 07 JAN 02 - Late for duty.

LOC, 04 JAN 02 - Misplaced line badge.

CM: None.
FD2004-00471

g. Record of SV: 26 May 99 - 15 Jan 01 Seymour Johnson AFB 4 (HAF Dir)
16 Jan @1 - 15 Jan 02 Seymour Johnson AFB 4 = (Annual}

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, AFOUA W/1 DEV.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (4) Yrs {0) Mos (10) Das
TAMS: (3) Yrs {8} Mos (13) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appin (DD Fm 293) dtd 19 Nov 04.

(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge}

ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

ATCE

1, Applicant's Issues.

2. Medical Documents.

3. Personal Statement.

4. Letter of Reprimand, 4 Jun 02.
5

Response to Proposed Article 15 Action.

3FEBOS/ia
JEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORK Fo 2004 - O49

4TH FIGHTER WING (ACC)
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE NC

 

JAN 27 2003

FROM: 4 CMS/CC

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force due to misconduct, specifically
minor disciplinary infractions. The authority for my recommendation is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208,
Chapter 5, Section H, Paragraph 5.49. According to Table 1.3 of AFI 36-3208, your discharge can be
characterized as honorable, general, or under other than honorable conditions. 1am recommending your

discharge be characterized as general.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. On 3 January 2002, you left your flightline badge in the Support Section. For this misconduct, you
received a Record of Individual Counseling. This is documented by an AF Form 174, dated 4 January

2002 (Tab 1a).

b. On 7 January 2002, you reported 40 minutes late for duty. For this misconduct, you received a
Record of Individual Counseling. This is documented by an AF Form 174, dated 7 January 2002

(Tab 1b).

c. On 8 January 2002, you failed to comply with Air Force Standards of Dress and Appearance by
leaving a vehicle and walking into your duty section without wearing your battle dress uniform shirt. For
this misconduct, you received a Record of Individual Counseling. This is documented by an AF Form

174, dated 8 January 2002 (Tab Ic).

d. On 27 February 2002, you failed to conduct an ELP check on the shop’s technical orders which
resulted in an inspection failure by Quality Assurance. For this misconduct, you received a Record of
Individual Counseling. This is documented by an AF Form 174, dated 2 March 2002 (Tab 1d).

e. On 28 May 2002, you reported 24 minutes late for duty. For this misconduct, you received a
Record of Individual Counseling. This is documented by an AF Form 174, dated 28 May 2002 (Tab le).

f. On 4 Jene 2002, you received a Letter of Reprimand for continuously reporting late for duty. This
is documented by a Letter of Reprimand, dated 4 June 2002 (Tab If).

g. On 19 November 2002, you failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
For this misconduct, you received an Article 15 for which the punishment that called for the reduction to
E-3 was suspended. This is documented by an AF Form 3070, dated 9 December 2002 (Tab 1g).

h. On 31 December 2002, you stole a pack of cigarettes from the Army and Air Force Exchange

Service. For this misconduct, the previously suspended punishment which called for reduction to the
grade of E-3 was vacated. This is documented by an AF Form 366, dated 9 January 2003 (Tab 1h).

Global Power For America
| ! Ppaced- coy 7 |

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising Special Courts-Martial (SPCM) jurisdiction or
a higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for

reenlistment m the Air Force.

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. Ihave

made an appointment for you to consult GieentMepe 22 Defense Counsel, at 1185 Cannon
Street, Suite 308, Seymour Johnson AFB NC. The Area Defense Counsel can be reached at ext. 2-5345

or DSN 722-5345. Your appointment has been scheduled on San) (date) at OFDO .
(time). You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the separation

authority to consider must reach me by O&0¢hns 3e40103 (allow three duty days) unless you request
and receive an extension for good cause shown. | will send them to the separation authority.

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a
waiver of your right to do so.

+ You have been scheduled for a mandatory medical examination at the 4th Medical Group, Seymour
Johnson AFB Family Practice (Gold Panel) at 1300 hours on 27 January 2003 with Capt Crider. You
must report 15 minutes prior to your scheduled appointment time.

8. You have been scheduled for mandatory Transition Assistance Program (TAPs) counseling on
3 Feb — 2003 at }3@Chours. You must report to building 3602 for your TAPs counseling.

9. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy of
AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at the unit orderly room or the Area Defense Counsel office.

10. Execute the attached acknowledgement and return it to me immediately.

 
   

“ommander, 4CMS —

Attachments:

Supporting Documentation:

AF Form 174, dated 4 January 2002
AF Form 174, dated 7 January 2002
AF Form 174, dated 8 January 2002
AF Form 174, dated 2 March 2002

AF Form 174, dated 28 May 2002
Letter of Reprimand, dated 4 June 2002
AF Form 3070, dated 9 December 2002
AF Form 366, dated 9 January 2003

vem eo gp

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0535

    Original file (FD2002-0535.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge, member consulted counsel and submitted a statement in his own behalf requesting an honorable separation in order to receive his G.I. On or about 19 July 2001, you received a Record of Individual Counseling for drinking alcohol while under the age of 21.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0307

    Original file (FD2002-0307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING EX NUMBER 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARMG DATE 06 Dec 2003 CASE NUMBER FD-2002-0307 Case heard at Randolph AFB, Texas Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR TO: SAFMRBR 550 C STREET WES,T, SUITE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00183

    Original file (FD2003-00183.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 F COMMA TET EE es anh Eran RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 :DREWS A¥B, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2003-00183 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The DRB nc ‘d that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on S¢;ember 13, 1999) that he understood he must receive an Honorable...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00214

    Original file (FD2003-00214.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2003-00214 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received two Articles 15, three Letters of Reprimand, two Letters of Counseling, and six Records of Individual Counseling. His misconduct included three missed appointments, insubordination toward a noncommissioned officer (NCO), two instances of reckless driving, three incidents of disrespect toward an...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0345

    Original file (FD2002-0345.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0345 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The record indicates the applicant received two Article 15’s for failure to go. © Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0345 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00298

    Original file (FD2003-00298.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 Previous edition will be used 1 I 1 1 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER F~-2003-00298 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. This is evidenced by AF Form 3070 dated 30 September 1999 with attachments (Tab lk). This is evidenced by AF Form 1058 dated 7 January 2000 with attachment (Tab lr).

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00467

    Original file (FD2006-00467.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 bI%O\I' SECRETARY OF TllE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COIINCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WINC, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) P r e v i o u s e d i t i o n w i l l be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2006-00467 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00502

    Original file (FD2004-00502.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS APB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00502 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0358

    Original file (FD2002-0358.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | gp9092-0358 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change his reenlistment code. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any. Approve separation and recommend to the 9 AF/CC that the respondent be discharged with an honorable discharge with or...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00112

    Original file (FD2006-00112.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received a suspended reduction to Airman, thirty days of extra duty, and a reprimand, The Vacation action was for failure to go to his appointed place of duty. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: My General discharge was improper because it did not involve, mainly with my performance at work, only what the results of actions I made off- duty. On or about 21 Jan 2004, you were one hour late arriving to class, This action is documented in a Record of Individual Counseling, dated 23...