Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.
.....*...........
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2002-103
In response to the applicant's OER reply, the supervisor stated that he received direct input from the applicant previous supervisor, who had been the applicant's supervisor for 40% of the reporting period. There are statements from the LT and CWO4 that the reporting officer treated the applicant abusively at a QMB meeting. However, it was the CO's meeting and not that of the reporting officer.
Available records reflect that the applicant was retired from the Air Force Reserve on 16 December 1996 by reason of medical disqualification, in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6). However, we do not find evidence that the applicant’s commander approved a recommendation for promotion. Exhibit H. Medical Records.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02848
Available records reflect that the applicant was retired from the Air Force Reserve on 16 December 1996 by reason of medical disqualification, in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6). However, we do not find evidence that the applicant’s commander approved a recommendation for promotion. Exhibit H. Medical Records.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . The applicant states no reasonable basis for the untimeliness of his request. A bad conduct discharge is an appropriate punishment for the offenses the applicant has committed.
Applicant submitted a written statement to the discharge authority along with two letters of support. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAES reviewed applicant's request and states that the RE code is correct (see Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant's response to the Air Force advisories states that DPPRS was incorrect in stating that...
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2003-105
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. This final decision, dated March 25, 2004, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant's former spouse filed this application asking for a correction to the applicant's military record. The stipulated decree did not mandate that the applicant elect SBP coverage for his then spouse, nor did it mention the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Discussion: The record of trial makes it clear that the applicant dishonorably failed to pay the five debts as alleged in the charge and five specifications. It would appear that the defense counsel advised the applicant to plead guilty because the evidence against him was overwhelming.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The applicant alleges that civilian offenses are routinely expunged from the record and he believes that he should be afforded the same consideration as any...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00586
h. On 15 October 1986, the applicant failed to report for duty at the prescribed time, for which he received written counseling. For this misconduct, the applicant was counseled. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102698C070208
NGB further stated that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 18 October 1977 and that, on 5 October 1977, he received appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer with an effective date of 19 October 1977. The NGB opinion stated that the applicant completed an application for Federal Recognition on 11 November 1979 and that he indicated that he was in the USAR from 18 October 1977 until the "present." The applicant's service personnel records contain a Department of the Army,...