NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
.....................................
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance witldwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
4 9,
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0488
In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Atch 1 -5; Record of Individual Counseling, dated 9 September 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012153
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. a. Paragraph 5-17 states an officer convicted and sentenced to dismissal as a result of general court-martial proceedings will be processed pending appellate review. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable or a general discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006633
Counsel requests reconsideration of the service member's (SM's) previous request for removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), and restoration of his rank to staff sergeant (E-6). On 22 July 2010, the ABCMR denied the SM's petition based on the following discussion and conclusions: * the Article 15 proceedings confirmed the imposing commander notified the SM of his intent to impose NJP action against him for the offenses *...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00354
You have the right to consult counsel. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00332
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFR 111- 1. counsel, you have the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001322
Counsel also contends that the applicant was denied effective assistance of counsel. Counsel also contends that when this counseling statement was put into evidence it allowed the appointing authority to become a witness against the applicant at a disenrollment board that he appointed. The DCOS observed: The applicant was initially notified that disenrollment proceedings were being initiated to determine whether he should be disenrolled under Army Regulation 145-1, paragraph 3-43a (14),...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03635
The appeal authority, the Air Combat Command Vice Commander, denied the appeal. Additionally, the applicant was advised of his right to counsel and consulted counsel prior to accepting nonjudicial punishment proceedings. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00364
At that time an appointment will be scheduled for you to consult capt- the Area Defense Counsel. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 5 1-201. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006023
The applicant states, in effect, that when he had a positive urinalysis, he was told he had to go to a drug rehabilitation program that he had to pay for himself. It is evident that the applicant had a positive urinalysis for a controlled substance and, based on the characterization of his service, that he was separated due to misconduct - drug abuse. Based on the fact that the preponderance of evidence shows that the applicant was not provided the rights required when being processed for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013625C070206
Counsel states that this is the applicant's third request for correction of his discharge records. The applicant was discharged without a hearing. The applicant was discharged on 23 May 1975.