Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00222
Original file (FD2003-00222.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE-REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD -

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE

AFSN/SSAN

 

AIC

 

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS SITTING

X RECORD REVIEW

 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ml

        
 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER

  
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

ee)

ING THE BOARD

 

 

A92,21, A94.53 A67.00
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 (| LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
‘25 JULY 2003 FD2003-00222

 

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

 

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

  
     
   
  
    
    

 

 

 

 

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

SAF/MIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2)

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°? FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p2003-00222

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

Issues. Applicant was discharged for misconduct, discreditable involvement with military or civil
authorities. He had an Article 15, eleven Letters or Records of Individual Counseling, and three Letters of
Reprimand. His misconduct included at least three instances of failure to go or being late for work or
appointments, a dress and appearance violation, financial irresponsibility and failure to pay just debts, and
dereliction of duty. Member also had at least four unsatisfactory progress periods on the weight
management program. At the time of the discharge, member consulted counsel and submitted a conditional
waiver of his right to an administrative discharge board hearing conditioned on receipt of no less than a
general (under honorable conditions) discharge, which was granted. The Board noted member had had at
least five separate opportunities to improve his behavior over a 12-month period during the enlistment from
which he was discharged, and he was age 24 and 25 when his offenses occurred, the same age as other
airmen who adhere to standards. He was counseled repeatedly in an effort to help him correct his
deficiencies. In spite of those rehabilitative efforts, he was unwilling or unable to improve his behavior.
The Board concluded applicant knew right from wrong and was responsible for his actions, and therefore
was held accountable for them. No inequity or impropriety was found in this discharge in the course of the
records review.

Applicant cited his post-service conduct and good citizenship since discharge. However, this evidence is
not relevant to the period of service under review and therefore, does not provide a basis for an upgrade.
Although applicant has matured and his conduct may have improved, this alone is insufficient to overcome
the factors that were the basis for discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further ‘¢oncludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. j

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2003-00222
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former A1lC) (HGH SGT)

 

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 2 Jul 91 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5~47a (Pattern of Misconduct - Discreditable Involvement with Military or
Civil Authorities). Appeals for Honorable Discharge.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 12 Dec 65. Enlmt Age: 18 9/12. Disch Age: 25 6/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-41, E-36, G-41, M-40. PAFSC: 62350 - Services Specialist.
DAS: 7 Nov &5..

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 28 Sep 84 - 13 Jun 85 (8 months 17 days) (Inactive).

(2) Enlisted as AB 14 Jun 85 for 4 yrs. Svd: 3 yrs 9 months
9 days, all AMS. AMN - Dec 85. A1C - Jun 86. SRA - 14 Jun 88. 9,9,9,9.

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a, Reenlisted as SRA 24 Mar 89 for 6 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 3 Mo 8 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: A1C - 21 Dec 90 (Article 15, 21 Dec 90)
SGT - Jun 89. ,

c. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 21 Dec 90, Lackland AFB, TX - Article 134. You, being
indebted to Century 21, American National, in the sum of
four hundred and fifty dollars for rent, which amount
became due and payable on or about 1 Oct 90, did, at or
near San Antonio, TX, from on or about 19 Nov 90 to on
or about. 10 Dec 90, dishonorably fail to pay said debt.
Reduction to A1C, forfeiture of $400.00 pay per month
for one month, and 30 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No
mitigation)

e. Additional: LOR, 14 FEB 91 - Failure to meet weight standards and
missing scheduled appointmens.
LOR, 02 JAN 91 - Failure to go.
LOR, 11 AUG 90 - Failure to go.
LTR, 26 JUN 90 - Financial irresponsibility.
LTR, 09 MAR 90 - Failure to comply with financial

responsibilities.
RIC, 05 JAN 90 - Dereliction of duty.
RIC, UNDATED ~ Failure to meet appointments and

unsatisfactory duty performance.
RIC, 06 DEC 89 - Lost weight control] card.
FD2003 -00222

LOC, 01 FEB 89 ~ Exceeding maximum allowable weight

Standards.
3700 SVS/CCF LTR, 01 APR 88 - Financial irresponsibility.

RIC, 24 OCT 86 - Violation of AFR 35-10.

£. CM: None.

g. Record of SV: 16 Dec 88 - 08 Nov 89 Lackland AFB 4 (CRO)
09 Nov 89 - 08 Nov 90 Lackland AFB 3 (Annual)

(Discharged from Lackland AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA W/3 BOLCS, AFGCM, NDSM, AFLSAR, NCOPMER, AFTR.

1. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (6) Yrs (9) Mos (5) Das
TAMS: (6) Yrs (0) Mos (19) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 1 May 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

Issue 1: Due to the mistakes I made while I was an active duty member of «+
the United States Air Force, for which I am very sorry for please consider the
action I have requested. Due to the growing and maturing stages of life I have
become a productive and positive member of the community I currently live in.
Upon separating from the armed forces. I landed a job working at Techneglas
Inc. of Columbus, Ohio. Entering 2003 IT have 12 years of service to this
company. I currently attend Columbus State Community College working towards a
degree in Micro-computing technology. Thank you for your time in this matter.

ATCH
None.

12JUN03/ia
& 9 MAY 1991

REPLY TO

ATIN OF: 3700 SVS/CC

SUBJECT:

Notification Letter - Board Hearing

 

1. [ am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a
pattern of misconduct consisting of discreditable involvement with military
or civil authorities according to AFR 39-10, under the provisions of
paragraph 5-47a. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation
authority to support this recommendation are attached.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. You did, at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, on or about 30 November
1990, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed
place of duty, for which you were reprimanded on 2 January 1991;

b. You, being indebted to Century 21, American National, in the sum of
four hundred and fifty dollars for rent, which amount became due and payable
on or about 1 October 1990, did, at or near San Antonio, Texas, from on or
about 19 November 1990 to on or about 10 December 1990, dishonorably fail to
pay said debt, for which you were nonjudicially punished on 21 December 1990;

c. You did, at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, between on or. about 30
July 1990 and on or about 31 July 1990, without authority, fail to go at the
time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, for which you were
reprimanded on 11 August 1990;

d. You, being indebted to the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, in
the sum of twenty-five dollars for uniform items, which amount became due and
payable on or about 15 June 1990, did, at or near San Antonio, Texas, from on
or about 15 June 1990 to on or about 26 June 1990, fail to pay said debt, as
evidenced by a notice of overdue payment, dated 26 June 1990; and

e. You, having knowledge of your duties, at Lackland Air Force Base,
Texas, on or about 23 December 1989, were derelict in the performance of
those duties in that you failed to maintain a professional relationship with
basic trainees detailed. under your supervision, as it was your duty to do,
for which you were counseled on 5 January 1990.

3. This action could result in your separation with an under. other than
honorable conditions discharge. I am recommending that you receive a general
discharge. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction er a higher authority
will: make the final decision in this matter. — If .vou.are discharged, you will
be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Ferce.:

AIR FORCE—A GREAT WAY OF LiFE

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE ows,
HEADQUARTERS 3700TH AIR BASE GROUP (ATC)
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE TX 78236-5000 £
i:
x
ean oo
4, You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.

d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of,
the board hearing. .

e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before
making a decision to waive any of your rights.

5. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to

Bidg 6612 , at 1300 __ on 5 Jun 91 1991.

6. Military legal counsel, Wiese. , building 6241,

extension 3-2924, has been obtained to assist you. An appointment has been
scheduled for you to consult counsel at _ 9900 on 30 May 91 1991,
Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you
request is in the active military service and is reasonably available as
determined according to AFR 111-1. In addition to military counsel, you have
the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay expenses
incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if
employed, must be readily available.

7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays,
specifying the rights you choose to exercise. The statement must be signed
in the presence of your counsel who will also sign it. If you waive your
right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, you may submit
written statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the
discharge authority with the case file to be considered with this
recommendation. If you fail to respond, your failure will constitute a
waiver of the right to the board hearing.

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the
Privacy Act Statement as explained in AFR 39-10, attachment 6. A copy of AFR
39-10 is available for your use at _Orderly Room :

3 Atch

la. LOR, 2 Jan 91

b. AF 3070, 21 Dec 90
c. LOR, 11 Aug 90
3.

o3 3 —NTOU.= TO hI Aa oe Oe

fp2003- 90222

. UCDPP ltr, 26 Jun 90

. AF Fm 174, 5 Jan 90

. 3700 SVS/CC ltr, 1 Oct 90

. AF Fm 174, undated

. AF Fm 174, 6 Oct 89

» ATC Fm 582, 17 Oct 90

» LOR, 1 Oct 90

. 3700 SVS/CCF Itr, 29 Mar 90
. 3700 SVS/CCF itr, 29 Jun 89
. UCDPP ltr, 11 Mar 89

. Ace Finance Co ltr, 22 Apr 88
. 3700 SVS/CCF-1tr, 1. Apr 88
. ATC Fm 18, 24 Oct 86

. 3700 SVS/CC ltr, 20 Feb 86
. WHMC/SGD Itr, 27 Jan 86

. LOR, 14 Feb 91

LOC, 1 Feb 89

Airman's acknowledgment

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00056

    Original file (FD2003-00056.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN ma | TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL uj.) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0056 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. And, ten Records of Individual Counseling for driving an uninsured vehicle, violation of AFR 35-10 (four times), failure to meet physical fitness standards, failure to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00167

    Original file (FD2003-00167.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN Alc PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ~ COUNSEL :- : YES | NO xX [ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0167 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In addition, he received three Letters of Reprimand and two Records of Individual...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00186

    Original file (FD2003-00186.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | 5593.01 86 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. a, ee ROE » Lt Col, USAF 14 Atch Commander, 379 SPS - 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00235

    Original file (FD2005-00235.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN | AB ay TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING qa x x x x x ISSUES 493,99 INDEXNUMBER — 6 5) SUBMITIED 10 THE BOARD (9° I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0531

    Original file (FD2002-0531.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 58 MED GP/CC recommends the respondent be separated from the United States Air Force with a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation pursuant to AFR 39-10, Section H, paragraph 5~-47(b) for a pattern of misconduct. The respondent has met with military counsel and has elected to submit statements regarding this discharge action. Forward the case to |2AF/CC recommending the respondent receive an honorable discharge; or c- Separate the respondent with a general discharge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00044

    Original file (FD2005-00044.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. g. Record of SV: 03...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0382

    Original file (FD2001-0382.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0382 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. However, after a thorough review of the record and considering testimony and evidence submitted by the applicant the Board finds that the applicant’s character of discharge and reason for discharge are inequitable. (Discharged from F.E.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00308

    Original file (FD2006-00308.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NllMRFR FD-2006-00308 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. SGQF LTR, 25 OCT 91 - Returned check notification.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0270

    Original file (FD2002-0270.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | yp9992-0270 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. For the Respondent: Respondent has submitted a personal statement on his own behalf with 3 attachments (see tab 3) for you to consider when making your decision in his case, Respondent requests he be granted probation and rehabilitation, or if discharged, that his service be characterized as honorable, 3. Amn's Written Presenta- tion to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00170

    Original file (FD2003-00170.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | gp9903-00170 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2003-00170 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD — (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. (LOC, 15 Feb 89, atch 4), (LOR, 15 Feb 89, atch 5), (UIF entry,15 Feb 89, atch 6) e. On 30 Apr 89 you operated a vehicle while drunk for which you received Article 15 punishment on 5 May 89.